AccuRanker vs STAT Search Analytics in 2026: self-serve on-demand tracking vs enterprise scale with 75+ SERP features
Two rank trackers built for different scales. One is a self-serve platform with on-demand refresh starting at $224 per month. The other is an enterprise-only tool from Moz built to track millions of keywords with 75+ SERP feature types.
AccuRanker
STAT Search Analytics- AccuRanker publishes self-serve pricing from $224 per month for 1,000 keywords. STAT requires a sales conversation and does not publish pricing at any account size.
- STAT tracks AI brand visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Mode, five platforms including Gemini and Claude, which AccuRanker does not track.
- AccuRanker offers on-demand rank refresh, triggering an immediate check on any keyword. STAT tracks every keyword daily on a fixed schedule with no on-demand option.
- STAT tracks 75+ SERP feature types at daily cadence. AccuRanker offers more than 50 filter options for segmenting keyword data but does not publish a specific SERP feature type count.
- AccuRanker tops out at 5,000 keywords on its self-serve Expert plan before requiring Enterprise. STAT is built from the ground up for accounts tracking hundreds of thousands to millions of keywords.
- Neither tool offers built-in white-label reporting. Both AccuRanker and STAT expect agencies to build branded reports via the API.
Comparing AccuRanker and STAT Search Analytics comes down to scale and access model. AccuRanker is a self-serve rank tracker with published pricing from $224 per month, on-demand rank refresh, and AI search monitoring across four platforms, built for agencies and enterprise teams tracking up to a few thousand keywords per account. STAT, now part of Moz, is a contact-only enterprise platform built for teams tracking hundreds of thousands to millions of keywords, with daily tracking across 75+ SERP feature types and AI brand visibility monitoring across five platforms including Gemini and Claude. Both cover Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) measurement as an add-on to core rank tracking, but the entry point and the account size each tool is designed for are fundamentally different. The right pick depends on whether your keyword volume and procurement process fit a self-serve budget or an enterprise sales cycle.
The tools at a glance
AccuRanker
Real-time rank tracking with on-demand refresh, AI search platform visibility, and 50+ filter options for agencies and enterprises
AccuRanker is a Danish rank-tracking platform built around data accuracy and speed, with on-demand rank refresh as its defining feature: trigger an immediate rank check on any keyword rather than waiting for the next scheduled update. Pricing is published and self-serve, starting at $224 per month for 1,000 keywords on Professional and scaling to $764 per month for 5,000 keywords on Expert, with an Enterprise tier for larger accounts.
AI search visibility is layered on top of the rank-tracking core, monitoring brand mentions in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode alongside traditional Google positions, with share-of-voice tracking across both. Coverage does not currently extend to Gemini or Claude. More than 50 filter options let teams segment keyword data by tag, device, location, and SERP feature, and unlimited API access with read and write tiers is included on all plans.
The trade-off versus STAT is scale and access. AccuRanker's self-serve tiers max out at 5,000 keywords before requiring a custom Enterprise conversation, which is a fraction of what STAT is built to handle. For agencies and mid-size enterprise teams that do not need to track hundreds of thousands of keywords, that ceiling is rarely a real constraint, and the self-serve pricing model is a meaningful advantage over STAT's sales-only access.
| Feature | Professional $224/month | Expert $764/month | Enterprise Contact for pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keywords | 1,000 | 5,000 | Custom |
| On-demand rank refresh | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI platforms tracked | 4 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode) | 4 | 4 |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Self-serve signup | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| White-label reports | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
STAT Search Analytics
Enterprise rank tracking at scale with daily SERP data, 75+ SERP feature types, and AI brand visibility monitoring from Moz
STAT Search Analytics is an enterprise rank-tracking platform, now part of Moz, built for SEO teams and agencies tracking keywords at a scale most self-serve tools cannot handle: hundreds of thousands to millions of keywords per account. Every keyword is checked daily, and the platform identifies over 75 distinct SERP feature types, including AI Overviews, Knowledge Panels, shopping results, and video carousels, at that same daily cadence.
STAT's AI visibility layer is broader than AccuRanker's: it monitors brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Mode, five platforms including Gemini and Claude, which AccuRanker does not currently track. Custom segmentation, backed by 1.25 billion keyword suggestions, lets enterprise teams build tracking sets that mirror their product lines, markets, or campaign structures at a scale AccuRanker's filter system is not designed for.
The access model is the clear trade-off against AccuRanker. STAT does not publish pricing at any account size, requires a sales conversation and demo before evaluation, and is explicitly not built for small businesses or solo practitioners. There is also no on-demand rank refresh; STAT runs entirely on its daily schedule. For teams below tens of thousands of keywords, AccuRanker's self-serve model and on-demand refresh will likely be the simpler, faster fit.
| Feature | Enterprise Contact for pricing |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Millions (custom) |
| Daily tracking | ✓ |
| On-demand rank refresh | ✗ |
| SERP feature types tracked | 75+ |
| AI platforms tracked | 5 (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, AI Mode) |
| API access | ✓ |
| White-label reports | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | AccuRanker | STAT Search Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Mode |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Limited | Limited |
| Answer / content gap analysis | No | No |
| Category intelligence | No | No |
| AEO content generation | No | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Unlimited (read + write), all plans | Yes (high-volume, enterprise) |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | Yes (multi-client accounts) | Yes (large agency accounts) |
| Starting price | $224/mo (self-serve) | Custom (sales-led) |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside AccuRanker and STAT Search Analytics?
AccuRanker and STAT both leave white-label reporting out entirely, and STAT adds a sales-led procurement process on top with no published pricing at any scale. If your team is tracking keyword volumes AccuRanker comfortably handles but still wants a self-serve, API-driven AI-visibility layer with white-label client delivery included, AI Peekaboo ships a read and write API and white-label guest access links on every plan from $50 per month, no demo required. It does not replace either tool's rank-tracking depth, but for agencies whose clients are specifically asking about AI-search visibility and want a branded report to show for it, AI Peekaboo is the lighter-weight, self-serve complement to a rank tracker at either AccuRanker's or STAT's scale.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
AccuRankerSTAT Search AnalyticsAccuRankerSTAT Search AnalyticsAccuRankerSTAT Search AnalyticsSTAT Search AnalyticsAccuRanker and STAT solve the same category of problem at very different scales. AccuRanker is the self-serve choice: published pricing, on-demand refresh, and 50+ filters for agencies and enterprise teams tracking up to a few thousand keywords who do not want a sales process. STAT is the enterprise-scale choice: daily tracking across millions of keywords, 75+ SERP feature types, and the broadest AI platform coverage in the category, accessed only through Moz's sales team. Teams should pick based on keyword volume and procurement tolerance first, and AI platform coverage or refresh model second.
Bottom line
Choose AccuRanker if you want self-serve signup, on-demand rank refresh, and a keyword volume under 5,000 without a sales call. Choose STAT Search Analytics if your account tracks hundreds of thousands to millions of keywords, you need 75+ SERP feature types at daily cadence, and Gemini or Claude coverage for AI brand visibility matters. For most agencies and mid-market SEO programs, AccuRanker is the more accessible starting point; STAT is the tool you graduate to once keyword volume outgrows self-serve rank trackers entirely.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, AccuRanker or STAT Search Analytics?
AccuRanker publishes self-serve pricing starting at $224 per month for 1,000 keywords. STAT does not publish pricing at any tier; every account goes through a sales conversation with Moz. For teams that want to know the cost before committing time to a demo, AccuRanker is the more transparent option.
Does AccuRanker or STAT track AI search visibility for ChatGPT and Gemini?
Both track AI brand visibility. AccuRanker covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode, but not Gemini or Claude. STAT covers ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Mode, five platforms total, making it the broader AI coverage option of the two.
What is the best AccuRanker alternative for agencies also tracking AI search visibility on Claude?
STAT Search Analytics tracks Claude alongside ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Google AI Mode, which AccuRanker does not currently support. The trade-off is that STAT requires an enterprise sales process with no published pricing, while AccuRanker offers self-serve signup from $224 per month without Claude coverage.
How many keywords can each tool track?
AccuRanker's self-serve tiers go up to 5,000 keywords on the Expert plan at $764 per month, with a custom Enterprise tier above that. STAT is built specifically for accounts tracking hundreds of thousands to millions of keywords, with no fixed cap; account size is scoped during the sales process.
Does either AccuRanker or STAT offer white-label reporting for agencies?
Neither tool has a built-in white-label report generator. Both AccuRanker and STAT expect agencies to export data or use the API to build branded client reports in a separate tool. AI Peekaboo is a self-serve alternative that ships white-label guest access links on every plan if branded AI-visibility reporting specifically is the gap you need to close.
Is AccuRanker or STAT better for a team new to enterprise-scale rank tracking?
AccuRanker is the more approachable starting point: self-serve signup, published pricing, and a keyword ceiling of 5,000 that fits most agency and mid-market accounts. STAT is purpose-built for teams that have already outgrown standard rank trackers and need daily tracking across hundreds of thousands of keywords with 75+ SERP feature types; it assumes a level of scale and procurement capacity that most teams new to the category have not yet reached.