Comparison

AdProtektor vs Ads Lighthouse in 2026: Click-fraud protection vs brand-search ad evidence

AdProtektor assesses suspicious paid traffic and can send eligible exclusions to Google Ads or Meta audiences. Ads Lighthouse records who appeared on the brand searches a team deliberately monitors over time.

Updated October 21, 2026
AdProtektor
Ads Lighthouse
Key takeaways
  • AdProtektor protects Google Ads and Meta paid traffic using persistent visitor identity plus device, behavioural, and network signals; Ads Lighthouse monitors configured Google and Bing paid searches.
  • Ads Lighthouse records a configured search context, advertiser, ad copy, and destination, while AdProtektor records evidence around visits that reached a protected site.
  • AdProtektor Standard costs $84 per month for one domain and 5,000 monthly clicks; Ads Lighthouse Starter costs $49 per month for one project, 20 keywords, two locations, and 7,500 scheduled checks.
  • Ads Lighthouse Google Shopping monitoring starts on Growth at $99 per month; its REST API and white-label reports start on Scale at $299 per month.
  • AdProtektor Pro adds AI Person Analysis, 30-day session replays, up to 10 domains, and up to 40,000 monthly clicks; its public price range is $120 to $267 per month.
  • An AdProtektor block or exclusion submission does not prove Google or Meta accepted or applied it, and an Ads Lighthouse observation does not prove a keyword purchase, spend, or infringement.
  • The products can work together for brand protection, but one detects suspicious visits and the other preserves evidence from selected searches.

These tools protect different parts of a paid-media operation. AdProtektor begins after an ad click reaches a site: it evaluates browser, device, behaviour, and network signals, lets a team review or tune block decisions, and can send eligible IP exclusions to Google Ads or maintain a Meta Custom Audience. Ads Lighthouse begins before a click: it runs configured Google and Bing searches, saves the observed ad, copy, advertiser, and destination, then supports alerts, affiliate review, policy cases, and evidence packs. Choose AdProtektor when invalid traffic is degrading campaign quality or conversion signals. Choose Ads Lighthouse when the risk is a third party, affiliate, or competitor appearing on a brand search and the team needs a time-stamped record. Their entry plans are both self-serve, $84 per month for AdProtektor Standard and $49 for Ads Lighthouse Starter, but neither replaces the other’s job.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
AdProtektor$84/monthGoogle Ads and Meta advertisers with a documented invalid-traffic problem who will investigate flagged visits, tune safeguards, and verify what was sent to each advertising platform.
Ads Lighthouse$49/monthBrand-protection, affiliate-compliance, and PPC teams that need attributable evidence from chosen paid-search observations, rather than broad creative discovery or post-click fraud scoring.

AdProtektor

Click-fraud protection and fraud-aware conversion tracking for Google Ads and Meta advertisers

Full review →
AdProtektor screenshot

AdProtektor is a traffic-protection product for advertisers receiving paid visits from Google Ads or Meta. It assigns a persistent identity to a browser on a device and combines device, behavioural, and network signals when assessing a visit. Its labels include Real, Crawler, Bot, Competitor, and Click Farm, but the documentation correctly frames those labels as assessments, not proof of a visitor’s identity or intent. The useful operational work is reviewing evidence, tuning rules, and controlling false positives rather than treating a dashboard label as a final verdict.

The enforcement route depends on the platform. Eligible blocked Google Ads IP addresses can be written to an account or selected campaigns, with an exclusion log. For Meta, eligible blocked visitors can be maintained in a Custom Audience that the advertiser applies as a campaign exclusion. Those delivery paths are valuable, but they remain distinct from the platform’s own matching and processing. ConversionOS can also deliver eligible, deduplicated conversion events to Meta Pixel and Conversions API, Google Ads, and GA4, though it is separately priced as an add-on to fraud protection.

Standard is $84 per month for one domain, 5,000 monthly clicks, one seat, seven-day replays, and 30-day fraud evidence. Pro is the working upgrade when AI Person Analysis, more domains, longer retention, or higher volume is needed. It is not a brand-search monitoring system: it cannot tell you which domain appeared beside a brand term in a chosen city and device. Buy it only where a team will actually investigate traffic quality and act on the resulting records.

Pricing
Feature
Standard
$84/month
Pro
$120-$267/month
Enterprise
$316-$463/month
True Tracking Core
$39/month
True Tracking Scale
$139/month
True Tracking Max
$219/month
ProductGoogle Ads and Meta fraud protectionGoogle Ads and Meta fraud protectionGoogle Ads and Meta fraud protectionConversionOS onlyConversionOS onlyConversionOS only
Included monthly volume5,000 clicks10,000-40,000 clicks50,000-150,000 clicks10,000 tracked sessions50,000 tracked sessions100,000 tracked sessions
Domains1Up to 10, 5 on smallest tier201310
Replay / fraud-evidence retention7 days / 30 days30 days / 60 days60 days / 90 daysNot applicableNot applicableNot applicable
AI Person AnalysisNoYesYesNoNoNo
Team seats1310Not publishedNot publishedNot published
Best for: Google Ads and Meta advertisers with a documented invalid-traffic problem who will investigate flagged visits, tune safeguards, and verify what was sent to each advertising platform.

Ads Lighthouse

Brand-search ad monitoring for Google, Bing, and Google Shopping with policy and evidence workflows

Full review →
Ads Lighthouse screenshot

Ads Lighthouse monitors paid results for the exact keywords, locations, devices, and schedule a project defines. It checks Google and Bing search ads on every plan, with sponsored Google Shopping observations available from Growth. A saved observation retains the search context, advertiser domain, ad copy, and destination, creating a useful record when a brand team needs to investigate an affiliate, coupon site, competitor, or unfamiliar advertiser appearing on an important term.

Its policy workflow is its reason to choose it over a generic ad library. Teams can identify affiliate URL parameters, leave unfamiliar IDs visible for review, open policy cases, evaluate rules against saved ads and destinations, and trace eligible destinations server-side. Alerts can be delivered by email, Slack incoming webhook, or webhook JSON. Observed visibility is the share of saved monitored searches where a domain appeared, not Google Ads impression share, spend, proof of a purchased keyword, or proof that an infringement occurred.

Starter costs $49 per month for one project, 20 keywords, two locations, 7,500 scheduled checks, and 100 on-demand checks. Growth adds Shopping at $99, while Scale at $299 adds REST API access, API keys, and white-label reports. This is a monitoring allowance model, so a high-frequency multi-market programme must be planned before activation. Ads Lighthouse does not inspect suspicious traffic after a click and cannot submit Google IP exclusions or maintain Meta exclusion audiences.

Pricing
Feature
Starter
$49/month
Growth
$99/month
Scale
$299/month
Business
$599/month
Enterprise
Custom
Projects12510Agreed
Keywords2050150500Agreed
Scheduled checks7,50018,00060,000144,000Agreed
Google ShoppingNoYesYesYesYes
REST APINoNoYesYesYes
White-label reportsNoNoYesYesYes
Best for: Brand-protection, affiliate-compliance, and PPC teams that need attributable evidence from chosen paid-search observations, rather than broad creative discovery or post-click fraud scoring.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
AdProtektor
Ads Lighthouse
Primary jobPaid-traffic protectionBrand-search monitoring and evidence
Google and Bing search monitoringNoYes
Google Shopping monitoringNoFrom Growth
Post-click suspicious-traffic assessmentYesNo
Google Ads exclusion submissionsEligible blocked IPs can be sentNo
Meta exclusion audienceEligible blocked visitors maintained hourlyNo
Affiliate and policy casesNoYes
REST APINot published in reviewed profileScale and above
Starting price$84/month$49/month

Which should you choose?

Investigating suspicious paid visits after they reach a siteAdProtektor
Saving evidence of third-party ads on a brand keywordAds Lighthouse
Maintaining a Meta audience from eligible blocked visitorsAdProtektor
Monitoring Google Shopping on selected terms and locationsAds Lighthouse
Creating affiliate-compliance cases and destination tracesAds Lighthouse
Sending eligible Google Ads IP exclusions with an audit logAdProtektor
A programme needing both search evidence and traffic-quality controlsUse both for their separate jobs

The safest choice is to avoid treating either product as a complete brand-protection platform. AdProtektor assesses a visit after it arrives and can initiate platform-specific protection actions. Ads Lighthouse saves evidence that an ad appeared in a selected search context and supports investigation before a visitor ever clicks. Their common language of protection hides two separate evidentiary boundaries: a fraud classification is not proof of intent, and a search observation is not proof of spend, a keyword purchase, or a policy breach.

Bottom line

Choose AdProtektor when campaign quality is being harmed by suspicious traffic and a team can review evidence, set thresholds, and verify exclusion logs. Choose Ads Lighthouse when brand-term monitoring needs attributable observations, alerts, affiliate analysis, and policy cases across Google, Bing, or Shopping. They can sensibly sit side by side for an advertiser with both risks. Do not buy Ads Lighthouse expecting it to block traffic, and do not buy AdProtektor expecting a historical record of who showed ads on a brand search in a chosen market.

Frequently asked questions

Is AdProtektor or Ads Lighthouse better for stopping affiliate ads on my brand name?

Ads Lighthouse is better for investigating affiliate ads on a brand name because it saves configured search observations and supports affiliate ID matching, policy cases, destination traces, and evidence packs. AdProtektor is better for suspicious traffic that has already reached your site.

Can Ads Lighthouse block suspicious Google Ads clicks the way AdProtektor can?

Ads Lighthouse cannot block suspicious Google Ads clicks because it monitors configured search results rather than scoring paid visits on your site. AdProtektor can send eligible blocked IP addresses to a connected Google Ads account or selected campaigns and records those submissions in an exclusion log.

Does AdProtektor guarantee that Google or Meta applies every exclusion?

AdProtektor does not guarantee that Google or Meta applies every exclusion because platform matching and processing remain under each platform’s control. Its value is the evidence and delivery workflow, including Google exclusion logs and a maintained Meta Custom Audience for eligible blocked visitors.

Which Ads Lighthouse plan includes Google Shopping monitoring and API access?

Ads Lighthouse Growth includes Google Shopping monitoring at $99 per month, while REST API access and API keys begin on Scale at $299 per month. Scale also includes white-label reports, which Starter and Growth do not list. A team needing both capabilities should therefore budget for Scale.

Should an ecommerce brand use both AdProtektor and Ads Lighthouse?

An ecommerce brand should use both only when it has separate, recurring needs for post-click traffic protection and brand-search evidence. AdProtektor addresses Google Ads and Meta traffic quality, while Ads Lighthouse records selected Google, Bing, and Shopping observations for affiliate or policy review.

Photo of Filipe Lins DuarteReviewed by Filipe Lins DuarteCo-Founder & CEO

Vast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.

Photo of John RiceChecked by John RiceCo-Founder & CTO

15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.

Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.

Found this useful? Share it: