AdProtektor vs Free Ad Diagnosis Tool in 2026

AdProtektor is for a paid-media team with a defined invalid-traffic concern rather than a vague performance question. It gives a browser on a device a persistent visitor identity and combines device, behavioural, and network signals to classify visits as Real, Crawler, Bot, Competitor, or Click Farm. Those categories are product assessments, not proof of a person’s identity or intent. The practical workflow is more important than the labels: a user can configure protection by website, set eligible click-frequency rules, review session evidence, whitelist known traffic, manually block or unblock visitors, and export block lists. That makes it possible to challenge a classification instead of treating a dashboard estimate as recovered spend.

Its platform paths are specific. Eligible blocked Google Ads IPs can be submitted to a connected account or selected campaigns and recorded in an exclusion log, without changing the advertiser’s manual exclusions. Eligible Meta visitors can be added to a Custom Audience that is maintained hourly and then applied as a campaign exclusion. A local block does not mean Google accepted an IP, Meta matched an audience member, or either platform applied the exclusion. That limitation is not cosmetic. An advertiser should inspect delivery logs, platform configuration, and campaign outcomes before claiming an effect.

Standard costs $84 per month for one domain and 5,000 clicks, with seven-day clean-session replay and 30-day fraud evidence. Pro ranges from $120 to $267 per month, adding AI Person Analysis, up to 10 domains, three seats, longer retention, and 10,000 to 40,000 clicks. ConversionOS is separately priced at checkout on protection plans, or sold as True Tracking from $39 per month, and can deliver eligible deduplicated events to Meta Pixel and Conversions API, Google Ads, and GA4. The reviewed profile does not establish Microsoft Ads protection or a general campaign diagnosis feature.

Free Ad Diagnosis Tool is a problem-framing utility, not a connected advertising platform. It starts with a choice such as poor-quality leads, high cost per lead, high CPC, performance decline, weak sales, or uncertainty, then changes the follow-up questions according to the selected platform and answers. On the Google Ads path it can ask about campaign type, search intent, spend, clicks, leads, Quality Score, location targeting, conversion tracking, and the next step after the landing page. The Meta path instead covers creative format, objective, audience approach, impressions, reach, link clicks, frequency, and where a lead is captured.

The calculations only use inputs the advertiser provides. For Google Ads, it can derive CPC, CPL, and conversion rate where the relevant figures are entered. For Meta Ads it can additionally derive CTR, CPM, and frequency. A short-video or Reel path can use three-second views and ThruPlays for directional hook and hold signals. The result displays a health score, a confidence percentage, a likely first focus area, funnel stages, and up to four suggested next checks. It can compare a later result with the last local result for that platform and offers a Download / Print Report button.

The limitation should guide the buying decision. It never connects to Google Ads or Meta, cannot inspect tracking, and cannot tell whether an entered number is correct. Its rule-based score is an agenda for a manual audit, not an account finding. The published tool has no paid tiers, API, shared workspace, scheduled monitoring, or automated action. It is worth using before a small business changes targeting or budget blindly, particularly when the team has figures but no hypothesis. It is not a replacement for AdProtektor when the working hypothesis is repeat clicks, bots, competitors, or click farms.