Ads Lighthouse vs Use Poach in 2026: brand-search evidence vs a personal Meta swipe file
Ads Lighthouse is the clear choice for scheduled monitoring of brand search ads on Google, Bing, and Google Shopping. Use Poach is the inexpensive choice for keeping individual Facebook Ad Library examples as local files or Notion records after you find them.
Ads Lighthouse monitors configured Google and Bing brand searches on every plan, with Google Shopping from Growth; Use Poach captures ads a researcher has already found in Facebook Ad Library.
Ads Lighthouse Starter is $49 per month and includes one project, 20 keywords, two locations per project, and 7,500 scheduled checks; Use Poach Free is $0 and Pro is $67 lifetime.
Ads Lighthouse can retain search, device, place, time, copy, and destination evidence, while Use Poach saves local media and a metadata screenshot card.
Use Poach Pro creates a 13-column database in the customer’s own Notion workspace and saves selected captures as native rows.
Ads Lighthouse adds REST API access and white-label reports on Scale and above, starting at $299 per month; Use Poach does not publish an API or team reporting workflow.
Neither product establishes ad spend, conversion results, or profitability from an observed ad.
Choose Ads Lighthouse when the question is whether a named advertiser appeared on the brand searches and locations you configured. Its saved observations retain the search term, engine, device, location, time, advertiser domain, copy, and destination, then support alerts, exports, cases, and evidence work. Choose Use Poach when the question is how to retain one useful Facebook Ad Library creative reference without putting it in another recurring dashboard. The free extension saves selected media and a metadata card to disk; the $67 lifetime Pro license adds a Notion database in the customer’s own workspace. These products do not overlap in channel or job. Ads Lighthouse cannot discover Meta ads, while Use Poach cannot monitor a competitor, search a proprietary archive, or prove who appeared in paid search. For a team that must document possible brand bidding or affiliate behaviour, Ads Lighthouse wins decisively. For a solo paid-social researcher who already works in Meta Ad Library, Use Poach is the much smaller and cheaper companion.
The tools at a glance
Ads Lighthouse
Brand-search ad monitoring for Google, Bing, and Google Shopping with saved evidence and compliance workflows
Ads Lighthouse monitors paid results on a defined brand-search plan. A project specifies the brand, domains, keywords, markets, devices, and schedule; the service then checks Google and Bing paid text ads, with sponsored Google Shopping listings available from Growth. Each saved observation ties an appearance to a specific keyword, location, device, engine, and time. That makes it useful for a brand-protection, trademark, or affiliate manager who needs more than a copied screenshot. It does not cover Meta, TikTok, display, native, Amazon, or a general ad library.
The product is strongest where the observation needs to become a working record. Paid Results groups domains found on monitored searches, advertiser and keyword drilldowns preserve appearance counts and copy history, and policy rules can assess saved copy, positions, and destinations. Teams can declare affiliate URL parameters and known IDs, open non-compliance cases, trace eligible destinations, and issue email, Slack, or webhook alerts. Observed visibility is the share of saved monitored searches where a domain appeared, not Google impression share, spend, proof of a purchased keyword, or proof of infringement.
Pricing is unusually explicit. Starter costs $49 per month, includes a seven-day trial, and allows one project, 20 keywords, two locations per project, 7,500 scheduled checks, and 100 on-demand checks. Growth adds Shopping at $99 per month. Scale costs $299 per month and is where REST API access, API keys, and client-branded PDFs begin. Saved observations and related history are retained for three UTC calendar months, so it is a current evidence workflow rather than an unlimited historical archive.
| Feature | Starter $49/month | Growth $99/month | Scale $299/month | Business $599/month | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google and Bing search ads | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Shopping product ads | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Most frequent schedule | Once a day | Every 6 hours | Every 2 hours | Every hour | Every 15 minutes |
| REST API and white-label reports | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP server | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Use Poach
Chrome extension for saving Facebook Ad Library ads to local files and, with Pro, a Notion database you control
Use Poach begins after discovery, not before it. A researcher opens an ad in the public Facebook Ad Library and uses the Chrome extension to retain that selected example. Free saves the ad image or video and a metadata screenshot card to local disk. The company describes that card as including the headline, primary copy, CTA, advertiser, landing URL, dates, and researcher-applied tags, with metadata embedded in the PNG for ExifTool reading. It is a compact way to make a personal reference collection durable without subscribing to a hosted ad-spy product.
Pro changes storage rather than research coverage. For a one-time $67 lifetime payment, Use Poach creates a 13-column database in the customer’s Notion workspace and saves each capture as a native row with its screenshot. The published workflow supports niche, awareness-stage, and lead-type tags, searchable records, and deduplication in Notion. Its privacy policy says captured ads, screenshots, Notion content, and Notion tokens are not sent to the licensing service. Researchers who already organise briefs and references in Notion have a concrete reason to pay; a team seeking a shared intelligence platform does not.
The boundaries are important. Use Poach does not publish its own advertiser search, saved-search alerts, automatic competitor watchlists, TikTok, Google Ads, display, or native coverage. It also does not publish an API, multi-user workspace, approvals, reporting, or a broader integration catalogue. It cannot tell a researcher whether the captured ad performed well, how much it spent, or how long a commercial campaign will remain visible. Use it to preserve evidence you found, not to replace the initial Meta search or an account-management system.
| Feature | Free $0 | Pro $67 lifetime |
|---|---|---|
| Capture Facebook Ad Library ads to disk | ✓ | ✓ |
| Save ad image or video | ✓ | ✓ |
| Metadata screenshot card | ✓ | ✓ |
| Notion database sync | ✗ | ✓ |
| Recurring subscription | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Brand-search monitoring | Save selected Meta ad references |
| Ad channels covered | Google, Bing, and Google Shopping from Growth | Facebook Ad Library only |
| Scheduled competitor monitoring | Yes | No |
| Evidence retained | Configured-search observations and related evidence | Local media and metadata cards |
| Discovery database | No | No |
| Notion workflow | No | Yes, Pro |
| API and white-label reports | Scale and above | Not published |
| Published price | $49/month Starter | $0 Free or $67 lifetime Pro |
| Best fit | Brand search and compliance evidence | Personal Meta creative swipe file |
Which should you choose?
The deciding factor is where the evidence originates. Ads Lighthouse creates scheduled observations on searches the team configures, then supplies a workflow for acting on those observations. Use Poach preserves a creative that a researcher manually found in Meta’s public library. The latter is much less expensive and can be exactly right for a personal reference collection, but it cannot become a monitoring programme through better tagging. Conversely, Ads Lighthouse is too specialised and costly if all a buyer needs is a handful of Meta creative examples.
Bottom line
Buy Ads Lighthouse when the cost of missing a brand-search advertiser, affiliate marker, copy change, or destination is higher than the $49 monthly entry price. Growth is the relevant starting point when Google Shopping matters, while Scale is required for API keys and white-label PDFs. Use Use Poach Free for occasional Meta capture and Pro only when native Notion rows actively improve the team’s creative process. Neither product replaces the other: one records monitored search results, the other stores selected paid-social references.
Frequently asked questions
Should an affiliate manager use Ads Lighthouse or Use Poach to document unauthorised brand bidding?
Ads Lighthouse is the appropriate tool for documenting possible unauthorised brand bidding because it saves configured search observations with the query, engine, location, device, time, advertiser domain, copy, and destination. Use Poach only captures a Facebook Ad Library ad that someone already found, so it cannot establish a pattern of paid-search appearances or run compliance cases.
Can Use Poach replace Ads Lighthouse for a Meta and Google competitor monitoring workflow?
Use Poach cannot replace Ads Lighthouse for a Meta and Google monitoring workflow because it has no monitoring, Google coverage, or proprietary discovery database. It is a capture extension for selected Facebook Ad Library ads. Ads Lighthouse covers configured Google and Bing searches, but it also does not cover Meta monitoring, so a broader workflow needs separate tools.
Is Use Poach Pro worth $67 for a freelance Meta ads researcher using Notion?
Use Poach Pro is worth $67 for a freelance Meta ads researcher only when native, searchable Notion rows will be part of the working process. The Free tier already saves media and a metadata screenshot to disk. Pro adds the 13-column Notion database and capture sync, not a larger source of ads or competitor alerts.
Which Ads Lighthouse plan includes Google Shopping, API access, and client-branded reports?
Ads Lighthouse Growth includes Google Shopping at $99 per month, while API access and client-branded reports start on Scale at $299 per month. Starter still includes Google and Bing search-ad monitoring, team roles, exports, and the hosted MCP server, but it excludes Shopping, API keys, and white-label reporting.
Do either Ads Lighthouse or Use Poach show competitor ad spend or conversion performance?
Neither Ads Lighthouse nor Use Poach shows verified competitor ad spend or conversion performance. Ads Lighthouse records observed appearances on configured searches, and Use Poach preserves a selected public Meta ad. A visible ad or repeat appearance is useful evidence to investigate, but it does not establish spend, profitability, or conversion rate.
Vast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.
15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.
Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.

