Athena HQ vs Goodie vs Scrunch AI in 2026: Free GEO Audit vs Enterprise Closed-Loop vs Category Intelligence
Three tools that answer different questions about AI visibility. One starts free, one is a closed enterprise loop, one reframes the question entirely.
Athena HQ is the only one of the three with a free tier that runs an actual GEO audit with real citation data. You can see how your brand performs across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity before committing to a paid plan, which is rare in this category.
Goodie is the most complete AI visibility platform on the market: 12 AI models tracked, prompt research, optimization actions, agentic commerce visibility, an Agent Experience Suite for crawler behavior, and revenue attribution through Google Analytics. The starting price of $399/month filters out most teams without enterprise budgets.
Scrunch AI reframes the question. Instead of brand-level mention tracking, it maps what is driving citations across your category first, then shows where your brand sits. This is the most useful framing for content strategy work, but $250/month starting price and enterprise-only API limit the buyer pool.
None of the three offers white-label delivery on standard plans. If you need to deliver reports to clients under your own brand, AI Peekaboo is the alternative path from $50/month with white-label included on every tier.
Athena HQ's jump from free to $295/month is steep with no mid-tier. Goodie starts at $399/month. Scrunch AI starts at $250/month. If budget is the constraint, Athena HQ's free tier is the only way to access real AI citation data at zero cost.
Goodie is the only platform with revenue attribution tied to AI visibility through Google Analytics. For teams who need to prove ROI to finance, that integration is the differentiator. The other two stop at the visibility score.
How does Athena HQ compare to Goodie and Scrunch AI for teams building a generative engine optimization (GEO) programme in 2026? All three operate in the AI visibility category, but the pricing model, depth of features, and what you actually get for your money are different. Athena HQ is the only one with a genuine free tier that lets you run a real GEO audit before spending anything, paired with a sharp jump to $295/month on the paid plan. Goodie is a closed-loop enterprise platform that runs research, monitoring, optimization actions, content generation, and revenue attribution across 12 AI models starting at $399/month. Scrunch AI takes a different angle, asking what is driving citations across your entire category before narrowing to your brand. The right pick depends on whether you need a free entry point, full closed-loop execution, or category-level intelligence to drive your content strategy.
The tools at a glance
Athena HQ
Free-to-start GEO audit platform with citation gap analysis and API access on paid plans
Athena HQ is a generative engine optimization platform that tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Its core differentiator is the GEO audit: a structured analysis that identifies not just whether your brand is cited, but which content gaps are preventing better citation rates. The free Essential plan lets you run an actual audit and see real citation data, which is more substantial than the teaser previews most tools offer at the free tier.
The paid Starter plan at $295/month unlocks citation source tracking, API access, unlimited competitor benchmarking, and deeper content gap analysis. That is the level where the platform becomes useful as a content strategy input rather than just a one-off audit. The pricing jump from free to $295 is significant, with no mid-tier option, which is the main friction point in the product.
The platform does not track Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, or Meta AI. For teams whose audience relies heavily on Google AI surfaces, that gap is a real consideration. Athena HQ is best understood as a content strategy tool that connects AI citation data to editorial decisions, not as a comprehensive multi-engine monitor.
| Feature | Essential Free | Starter $295/mo | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| GEO audit | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Content gap analysis | Basic | Full | Full |
| Citation source tracking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | 2 | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| API access | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Goodie
End-to-end AEO platform covering 12 AI models with agentic commerce and revenue attribution
Goodie is an enterprise answer engine optimization (AEO) platform that runs the full loop: discovering which prompts your customers use in AI search, monitoring how your brand appears across those answers, prioritizing optimization actions, generating AI-optimized content, and connecting visibility to revenue through Google Analytics attribution. The platform tracks 12 AI models including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, DeepSeek, Amazon Rufus, and Sparky.
The breadth of the action layer is what separates Goodie from simpler monitoring tools. Beyond a dashboard, Goodie delivers a prioritized list of optimization actions, an AEO content writer that generates brand-aligned content for LLM consumption, and an Agent Experience Suite that analyzes how AI crawlers traverse your site and where technical gaps prevent visibility. Most visibility platforms stop at the dashboard. Goodie continues through to execution and proof of revenue.
The access friction is real. Explorer starts at $399/month for 3 engines and 100 prompts. Pro and Enterprise both require a demo conversation before pricing is disclosed. For brands already treating AI search as a serious channel and able to absorb the cost curve, Goodie covers more ground than any competitor. For everyone else, the price cuts you off early.
| Feature | Explorer $399/mo | Pro Contact sales | Enterprise Contact sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | 3 (ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity) | 6 (+Gemini, Copilot, Rufus) | Up to 11 (all major engines) |
| Prompts per month | 100 | 250 | 500+ |
| AI responses analyzed/mo | 3,000 | 7,500 | 15,000+ |
| Optimization actions/mo | 10 | 30 | 60+ |
| MCP server access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agentic commerce visibility | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Revenue attribution | Google Analytics | Full attribution | Custom modeling |
| API and data export | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-brand tracking | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
Scrunch AI
Category-level AI citation intelligence for content strategy
Scrunch AI is a citation intelligence platform that maps citation patterns at the category level before focusing on individual brand performance. Instead of asking where your brand appears in AI answers, it starts by mapping what prompts are driving citations across your entire category and which competitors are getting cited. This shift in framing gives content teams a different kind of insight: a picture of which topics, formats, and sources AI models reliably cite in their niche.
The platform includes a 1,000-prompt industry library on the Starter plan, which removes the need to build a monitoring question set from scratch. These prompts are drawn from real AI query patterns in your category, and the citation data they generate shows what is working in AI answers before you invest in brand-level tracking. Persona-based analysis lets you filter citation patterns by user type, which is useful for brands serving multiple buyer segments.
The ceiling is on delivery. There is no white-label option, no agency tier, and the API is only available on Enterprise. If you need to send that data to external tools or build client-facing reports on a standard plan, you cannot. Scrunch AI is best understood as a category intelligence layer for content strategists, not as an agency-friendly monitoring platform.
| Feature | Starter $250/mo | Growth $417/mo | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|
| User licenses | 3 | 5 | Custom |
| Custom prompts | 350 | 700 | Custom |
| Industry prompts | 1,000 | 2,500 | Custom |
| Personas | 3 | 5 | Custom |
| Page audits | 5 | 10 | Custom |
| Enterprise Data API | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| SAML / OIDC security | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated GTM team | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity | Up to 12 (ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, AI Overviews, AI Mode, DeepSeek, Amazon Rufus, Sparky) | ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes (Starter and Enterprise) | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Yes (content gap analysis) | Yes (Optimization Actions) | No |
| Category intelligence | No | Yes (prompt research) | Yes |
| AEO content generation | No | Yes (AEO content writer) | Partial (page audits) |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | Yes (Agent Experience Suite) | No |
| Page content audits | No | No | Yes |
| API access | Paid plans only | Enterprise only | Enterprise only |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No | Yes (GA4, custom modeling) | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | No | Enterprise only | No |
| Starting price | Free | $399/mo | $250/mo |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Athena HQ, Goodie, and Scrunch AI?

Goodie starts at $399/month and locks API to enterprise contracts, Scrunch AI starts at $250/month with API on enterprise only, and Athena HQ has no white-label delivery on any tier. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool with white-label client reports plus read and write API on every plan from $50/month Starter, with no sales call. For agencies that need the same operational features without enterprise pricing or sales conversations, AI Peekaboo is the self-serve alternative.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
Athena HQ is the right starting point if budget is the constraint and you want real audit data before spending anything. Goodie is the right answer if you have enterprise budget and need the full closed-loop platform with revenue attribution. Scrunch AI is the right answer if your work is content strategy and you want to understand the citation landscape across your whole category before investing in brand-level monitoring. None of the three offers white-label delivery on standard plans, so agencies with client reporting needs should look at AI Peekaboo separately.
Bottom line
The question each tool is best at answering is different. Athena HQ answers "what does my AI citation position look like and where are the content gaps, starting free". Goodie answers "how do I run the full AEO loop from research to revenue attribution across 12 models". Scrunch AI answers "what is driving citations in my category and where do I fit". Pick the tool that matches the question you most need answered first.
Frequently asked questions
Which of these three tools offers a free tier?
Athena HQ is the only one with a free tier. The Essential plan includes a real GEO audit with citation data across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity, plus basic content gap analysis. Goodie and Scrunch AI are paid-only with no free option.
How does Goodie differ from Athena HQ and Scrunch AI on AI engine coverage?
Goodie tracks up to 12 AI models including ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, DeepSeek, Amazon Rufus, and Sparky. Athena HQ tracks 4 models (no Google AI Overviews). Scrunch AI tracks 5 (no Google AI Overviews, no AI Mode). For brands whose audience is active on Google AI surfaces, Goodie has the only meaningful coverage.
What is category intelligence and how does Scrunch AI approach it?
Category intelligence maps citation patterns across your entire niche rather than just your brand. Scrunch AI starts with a 1,000-prompt industry library, identifies which topics and sources AI models reliably cite in your category, then shows where your brand sits within that landscape. This is a more useful framing for content strategy than brand-level monitoring, because it shows what is already working in AI answers before you decide what to create.
Can any of these tools generate AEO-optimized content?
Goodie is the only one with a dedicated AEO content writer that produces brand-aligned content for LLM consumption. Scrunch AI offers page audits with content recommendations but does not generate content itself. Athena HQ focuses on content gap analysis rather than content generation.
How do these tools differ on revenue attribution?
Goodie connects AI visibility to Google Analytics on Explorer and adds full attribution and custom revenue modeling on Pro and Enterprise. Athena HQ and Scrunch AI do not offer revenue attribution. For teams that need to justify the AI visibility investment to finance with revenue data, Goodie is the only option of the three.
Which tool is best for agencies managing multiple client brands?
None of the three is purpose-built for agency use. Goodie offers multi-brand tracking only on Enterprise. Athena HQ and Scrunch AI have no agency tier or white-label delivery on any plan. If white-label delivery and per-prompt agency economics matter, AI Peekaboo is the alternative path from $50/month with white-label on every plan.


