Conductor vs DivvyHQ in 2026: An active enterprise AEO platform vs a sunset editorial calendar
Conductor is actively developed and tracks brand visibility across six AI platforms under an enterprise contract. DivvyHQ was acquired by Lytho in 2022 and no longer exists as a standalone product with its own roadmap.
Conductor
DivvyHQ- Conductor is an actively developed enterprise platform tracking six AI platforms. DivvyHQ was acquired by Lytho in 2022, and the original editorial-calendar product no longer has an independent roadmap.
- Neither tool publishes pricing. Conductor requires a sales conversation for its single Enterprise tier, and DivvyHQ's three tiers, Starter, Business, and Enterprise, were all listed as "Contact sales" even before the acquisition.
- DivvyHQ had no built-in AI assistance for content planning or brief generation. Conductor's AI content module drafts briefs and flags pages underperforming in AI answers relative to their keyword rankings.
- DivvyHQ's content intake forms and campaign grouping solved a stakeholder-coordination problem Conductor was never built to solve; Conductor has no editorial calendar or intake feature at all.
- Conductor ships an MCP Server and developer APIs for custom AI agent workflows. DivvyHQ's original product had no documented public API.
- WordPress publishing was DivvyHQ's strongest integration. Conductor's integrations are built around feeding SEO and AI visibility data into internal BI tools and dashboards, not publishing content.
- Conductor's 24/7 AI crawler bot monitoring has no equivalent anywhere in DivvyHQ's feature set, original or post-acquisition.
Conductor and DivvyHQ get compared because both once competed for a content team's budget, but one of them is not really a live purchase decision anymore. Conductor is an actively developed enterprise platform: six AI platforms tracked, 24/7 AI crawler bot monitoring, an MCP Server, developer APIs, and traditional SEO in one sales-led contract. DivvyHQ was a competent editorial calendar with content intake forms, campaign grouping, and configurable workflow approvals, but it was acquired by Lytho in 2022, the divvyhq.com domain now redirects to Lytho, and the original standalone product has no independent roadmap left. Anyone evaluating DivvyHQ today is really evaluating Lytho's compliance-focused creative operations platform, a different product with a different focus than what DivvyHQ originally built.
The tools at a glance
Conductor
Enterprise AEO and SEO platform with AI visibility tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and Claude
Conductor is an enterprise platform that tracks brand visibility across six AI platforms, ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, and layers that on top of traditional SEO: keyword rankings, technical audits, and content optimization. The 24/7 AI crawler bot monitoring watches for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and similar crawler activity on your site and fires real-time alerts, connecting indexing behavior to AI citation outcomes.
Its content module drafts briefs and flags pages that rank well in Google but are absent from AI answers, a recommendation layer rather than a calendar or publishing tool. Conductor has no editorial calendar, no content intake forms, and no campaign grouping features, none of which is its job; it is built to measure and diagnose, not to organize a team's production workflow.
The MCP Server and developer APIs matter for teams with engineering resources who want custom agents pulling live Conductor data. Access requires a sales conversation regardless, with no published pricing and no way to trial the platform without booking a demo. What Conductor guarantees, unlike DivvyHQ, is an actively maintained product with an ongoing roadmap.
| Feature | Enterprise Contact for pricing |
|---|---|
| AI platforms tracked | 6 (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, AI Overviews) |
| 24/7 bot monitoring | Yes |
| Content generation and briefs | Yes |
| MCP Server | Yes |
| Developer APIs | Yes |
| Traditional SEO tools | Yes |
DivvyHQ
Content calendar and editorial planning platform for structured publishing teams
DivvyHQ was a content planning and editorial calendar platform built for teams that needed a structured, shared view of what content was planned, in progress, or published across channels. The visual calendar let content items be color-coded and dragged to reschedule without losing metadata, and content intake forms captured stakeholder requests directly into the calendar instead of arriving as ad-hoc Slack messages or emails.
Campaign grouping tied individual blog posts, social updates, and emails to a broader initiative, and workflow stages were configurable per content type with assigned owners and approval gates. The WordPress integration was the strongest in the stack, letting writers publish directly from the platform with the calendar item updating automatically. None of this included AI assistance for planning or brief generation at any point in the product's independent life.
In 2022, DivvyHQ was acquired by Lytho, a creative operations platform focused on brand compliance workflows. The divvyhq.com domain now redirects to Lytho, and the standalone product has been folded into Lytho's broader, differently-focused platform. Teams evaluating DivvyHQ today are effectively evaluating Lytho, a product built around a different problem than the editorial calendar DivvyHQ originally set out to solve.
| Feature | Starter Contact sales | Business Contact sales | Enterprise Contact sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content calendars | 1 | Multiple | Unlimited |
| Users included | Up to 3 | Custom | Custom |
| Content intake forms | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Campaign planning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Workflow approvals | No | Yes | Yes |
| WordPress integration | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| SSO and admin controls | No | No | Yes |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Conductor | DivvyHQ |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Google AI Overviews | None (no AI visibility tracking) |
| 24/7 AI crawler bot monitoring | Yes | No |
| Traditional SEO (rankings and audits) | Yes | No |
| AI content briefs / optimization suggestions | Yes (briefs and edit suggestions) | No (no built-in AI assistance for planning or brief generation) |
| Visual content / editorial calendar | No | Yes (multi-channel drag-and-drop calendar) |
| Content intake / request forms | No | Yes (stakeholder intake forms) |
| Campaign grouping | No | Yes |
| Configurable workflow approvals | No | Yes (configurable per content type) |
| WordPress / CMS publishing integration | No | Yes (strongest integration in its stack) |
| MCP Server / developer APIs | Yes (enterprise contract) | No |
| Public API access | Yes (enterprise contract only) | Not documented |
| Active, independently maintained roadmap | Yes (actively developed enterprise platform) | No (acquired by Lytho in 2022, original roadmap discontinued) |
| Public pricing | No | No |
| Starting price | Custom (sales-led) | Contact sales |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Conductor and DivvyHQ?
Conductor gates its six-platform AI visibility tracking, MCP Server, and developer APIs behind an enterprise sales process, and DivvyHQ never had any AI visibility features at all, its own roadmap is now folded into Lytho's compliance-focused product. If the gap is a self-serve way to measure whether your content is actually getting cited in ChatGPT, Gemini, or AI Overviews, AI Peekaboo ships a read and write API on every plan from $50 a month, no sales call required. It will not replace an editorial calendar the way DivvyHQ (now Lytho) does or watch crawler bot activity the way Conductor does, but it is a live, self-serve way to close the AI visibility measurement gap neither of these products currently fills for a smaller team.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
ConductorDivvyHQConductorDivvyHQConductorConductorThe most important fact in this comparison is not a feature gap, it is that DivvyHQ as an independent product effectively no longer exists. It was acquired by Lytho in 2022, the domain redirects, and the platform has been folded into a compliance-driven creative operations tool with a different focus. Conductor, by contrast, is under active development with an enterprise sales motion still adding AI platforms and features. If you are comparing these two for a 2026 purchase, you are really comparing a live, growing measurement platform against a legacy brand name now attached to a different product. That asymmetry should weigh more heavily than any single feature row in the matrix above.
Bottom line
Book the Conductor demo if you need active, ongoing AI visibility measurement across six platforms bundled with traditional SEO, and your procurement process can handle enterprise sales-led onboarding. Do not evaluate DivvyHQ as a standalone purchase; confirm you are actually looking at Lytho's current compliance-focused platform, and if what you actually want is the editorial calendar and intake-form workflow DivvyHQ used to offer, look at CoSchedule or Contently instead. Neither Conductor nor DivvyHQ (via Lytho) gives a lean content team self-serve AI visibility tracking; that gap is better filled by a dedicated platform like AI Peekaboo.
Frequently asked questions
Is DivvyHQ still a good option to evaluate in 2026?
Not as a standalone product, since DivvyHQ was acquired by Lytho in 2022 and the divvyhq.com domain now redirects to Lytho's site. Anyone researching DivvyHQ today is actually evaluating Lytho's creative operations platform, which has pivoted toward compliance-focused workflows rather than the pure editorial calendar DivvyHQ originally built.
Does Conductor include an editorial calendar like DivvyHQ had?
No, Conductor has no visual content calendar, content intake forms, or campaign grouping features; it is a measurement and SEO platform, not a planning tool. DivvyHQ's original strength was exactly that calendar and workflow layer, which is not something Conductor was ever built to replace.
Did DivvyHQ ever have AI visibility or AEO tracking features?
No, the original DivvyHQ platform had no AI visibility tracking and no built-in AI assistance for content planning or brief generation of any kind. Conductor is the tool in this comparison built specifically to track brand visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews.
What should I look at instead if I wanted what DivvyHQ used to be?
DivvyHQ's own comparison data points to CoSchedule, Percolate, and Contently as the closer equivalents for teams that specifically want a standalone editorial calendar with workflow and intake features today, since the current Lytho product is not the same tool. None of those alternatives include Conductor's AI visibility tracking, so a team needing both would still evaluate that separately.
Why does Conductor not publish pricing, and did DivvyHQ publish pricing before the acquisition?
Conductor is sold as an enterprise product through a sales-led process, with pricing varying by team size and scope. DivvyHQ also never published pricing publicly, even at the Starter tier, requiring a sales contact for every plan. Neither tool lets a buyer compare costs without a conversation, which was a documented complaint about DivvyHQ from teams comparing it to more transparent competitors like CoSchedule.
Can I still get WordPress publishing support if I move away from DivvyHQ?
WordPress publishing was DivvyHQ's strongest integration, letting writers draft and publish directly from the platform. Conductor does not offer content publishing integrations at all, since its focus is measurement and SEO, not editorial production, so a team leaving DivvyHQ for Conductor would need a separate publishing or calendar tool alongside it.