Determ vs Mentionlytics in 2026: European news intelligence vs multilingual social and web monitoring
Determ leads with 100 million-plus news and broadcast sources and Central European depth. Mentionlytics leads with a $49/month entry price, 13-plus language coverage, and competitor tracking on every plan.
Mentionlytics starts at $49/month with competitor tracking included on every plan, including Basic. Determ's share-of-voice competitor tracking does not activate until the Expand plan at €299/month.
Determ indexes 100 million-plus sources with particular depth in Central and Eastern European news outlets. Mentionlytics covers 13+ languages from a single dashboard but is not positioned around any specific region.
Mentionlytics monitors Bluesky and Threads alongside X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Reddit. Determ's own materials describe its social platform coverage as narrower than dedicated social listening tools.
Mentionlytics offers white-label reporting on its Business plan at $624/month. Determ has no white-label delivery option on any tier.
Mentionlytics gates API access to its Advanced plan at $249/month. Determ gates API access to its Command plan at €499/month, a higher price point for the same capability.
Mentionlytics offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. Determ typically offers a trial period, though terms vary and should be confirmed on its site.
Determ and Mentionlytics both publish their pricing and both target teams that want brand monitoring without an enterprise sales process, but they built different products around that goal. Determ is a media intelligence platform rooted in PR and comms work, with 100 million-plus news, print, and broadcast sources and genuine strength in Central and Eastern European coverage. Mentionlytics is a web-and-social monitoring platform that starts cheaper, at $49/month against Determ's €99, and leads with 13-plus language coverage plus competitor tracking included from the entry tier, along with newer platforms like Bluesky and Threads. Determ's API sits behind its top Command plan; Mentionlytics unlocks API at $249/month and white-label reporting at $624/month. Neither tool is trying to be the other, but the overlap in mid-market self-serve monitoring makes them a natural side-by-side.
The tools at a glance
Determ
AI media intelligence for PR and comms teams with 100M+ source coverage
Determ indexes more than 100 million sources across online news, print, broadcast transcripts, forums, and social media, applying AI to cluster related coverage into topic threads and score sentiment at the sentence level. Its standout strength is regional: Croatian, Slovenian, Hungarian, Romanian, and other Central and Eastern European outlets get a depth of coverage that global monitoring tools tend to skip.
The feature set is monitoring-first: crisis alerts on volume or sentiment thresholds, scheduled PDF or CSV reports, and share-of-voice charts once you reach the Expand plan at €299/month. Pricing scales from Focus at €99/month to Command at €499/month, with a custom tier above that, and everything is published without a sales call.
Where Determ trails Mentionlytics is entry-tier value and social breadth. Share of voice and API access both sit behind higher tiers than Mentionlytics's equivalents, and Determ does not cover newer platforms like Bluesky or Threads. Its case for a mid-market team rests almost entirely on news and broadcast depth, particularly for brands with European exposure.
| Feature | Focus €99/mo | Expand €299/mo | Command €499/mo | Custom Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources monitored | 100M+ | 100M+ | 100M+ | 100M+ |
| Real-time alerts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor tracking | 1 competitor | 3 competitors | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Share of voice | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom dashboards | Limited | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Mentionlytics
Web and social media monitoring with multilingual coverage, AI-generated summaries, and competitor tracking from a single dashboard
Mentionlytics tracks mentions across social networks, news sites, blogs, forums, and review platforms in more than 13 languages from a single dashboard, with social coverage that includes X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube, Reddit, Bluesky, and Threads. The Basic plan starts at $49/month with a 14-day free trial and no credit card required, and competitor tracking is included from that entry tier rather than reserved for higher plans.
The AI Reporter feature, available from the Essential plan at $141/month, generates structured briefings from monitored mentions, surfacing key themes and sentiment shifts without requiring an analyst to read every result manually. Higher tiers add AI Emotion Analysis at Advanced ($249/mo) and AI Mention Clustering at Pro ($416/mo), both aimed at reducing manual review time as mention volume grows.
The gaps show up at the edges. API access does not unlock until Advanced at $249/month, and the API itself is described as less mature than some competitors'. There is no podcast monitoring, non-English sentiment accuracy lags English, and white-label reporting requires jumping all the way to Business at $624/month, a large step up from Advanced.
| Feature | Basic $49/mo | Essential $141/mo | Advanced $249/mo | Pro $416/mo | Business $624/mo | Enterprise From $1,083/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keywords tracked | 3 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40+ | 100+ |
| Languages | 13+ | 13+ | 13+ | 13+ | 13+ | 13+ |
| Competitor tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI Reporter | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White-label reports | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Source coverage | 100M+ sources | Social, news, blogs, forums, and reviews |
| News, print, and broadcast coverage | Yes | No dedicated broadcast/print monitoring |
| Language coverage | Strongest in Central and Eastern European languages | 13+ languages |
| Newer social platforms (Bluesky, Threads) | No | Yes |
| Competitor tracking included at entry tier | No, requires Expand plan (€299/mo) | Yes, on all plans including Basic |
| AI-generated summaries / briefings | No | Yes, AI Reporter from Essential plan |
| API access (lowest tier that includes it) | Command plan (€499/mo) | Advanced plan ($249/mo) |
| White-label delivery | No | Business plan ($624/mo) and above |
| Free trial | Typically available, confirm on site | Yes, 14 days, no credit card |
| Starting price | €99/mo | $49/mo |
Which should you choose?
The split between these two comes down to what kind of coverage matters most. Determ's 100 million-plus sources lean toward news, print, and broadcast, with a regional strength in Central and Eastern Europe that Mentionlytics does not attempt to match. Mentionlytics leans toward social and web coverage in 13-plus languages, with competitor tracking, AI briefings, and eventually white-label reporting available at a lower price point than Determ's equivalent tiers. A PR team producing press coverage reports for stakeholders will find Determ's depth worth the higher entry price. A small business or agency starting from zero, especially one that needs white-label delivery eventually, will get more for less from Mentionlytics.
Bottom line
Choose Determ if press and broadcast coverage, sentence-level sentiment, and European market depth are the priority, and you can accept share of voice and API access sitting behind higher-priced tiers. Choose Mentionlytics if you want the cheapest credible self-serve entry point into brand monitoring, competitor tracking included from day one, and a realistic path to white-label reporting as you scale into the Business plan. Agencies serving both PR-focused and social-focused clients may end up needing both, since the source coverage between them barely overlaps.
Frequently asked questions
Is Determ or Mentionlytics cheaper to start with?
Mentionlytics is cheaper at entry, starting at $49/month against Determ's €99/month, and it includes a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. Determ typically offers a trial too, though terms vary, and its entry tier does not include share-of-voice competitor tracking, which Mentionlytics includes on its cheapest plan.
Does Mentionlytics cover news and press the way Determ does?
Not to the same depth. Mentionlytics covers news sites and blogs alongside social platforms, but Determ's 100 million-plus sources and dedicated print and broadcast transcript coverage give it materially deeper press monitoring. Teams whose primary need is PR-style news tracking will find Determ the stronger fit.
Which tool has better coverage for European brands specifically?
Determ has the more targeted advantage for Central and Eastern Europe, with documented depth in Croatian, Slovenian, Hungarian, and Romanian-language news outlets. Mentionlytics covers 13+ languages more broadly across social and web sources, which suits pan-European social monitoring but is not positioned around any single region the way Determ is.
Can agencies get white-label reporting from either tool?
Mentionlytics offers white-label reporting on its Business plan at $624/month and above. Determ has no white-label delivery option on any tier. Agencies that specifically need branded client reports should plan around Mentionlytics's Business tier rather than Determ.
Does either tool monitor Bluesky or Threads?
Mentionlytics does, covering both platforms alongside X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, LinkedIn, YouTube, and Reddit at every plan level. Determ does not call out Bluesky or Threads coverage and describes its social monitoring generally as narrower than dedicated social listening tools.
Is Determ or Mentionlytics better for a mid-market PR agency managing multiple clients?
Mentionlytics is the stronger base for a multi-client agency, mainly because its Business plan adds white-label reporting, something Determ offers on no tier at all. Determ still wins the individual client engagement where press and broadcast coverage, particularly with European exposure, is the deliverable clients actually care about, so agencies running both PR-heavy and social-heavy accounts often end up licensing both rather than picking one.

