InLinks vs Quattr in 2026: Standalone entity linking vs a unified SEO, AEO, and GEO platform
InLinks is a self-serve linking and knowledge graph tool from $49 a month. Quattr bundles internal linking inside a demo-only platform that also tracks six AI engines and drafts content with an AI agent.
InLinks
Quattr- InLinks builds internal linking around a knowledge graph of entities across a site. Quattr's internal linking AI generates vector embeddings of every page and rebuilds the link structure automatically as new content is published, but it's one feature inside a much larger platform.
- Quattr tracks brand visibility across Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini. InLinks does not track AI chatbot citations at all and says so directly in its own FAQ.
- InLinks has transparent self-serve pricing from a free tier through $196/month. Quattr has no public pricing and requires a sales demo before you learn what it costs.
- Quattr is rated 4.9/5 on G2 across 65 reviews, reflecting satisfaction at the enterprise accounts it's sold to. InLinks does not publish a comparable third-party rating in its own materials.
- InLinks includes content gap analysis and schema markup generation as named, standalone features. Quattr covers similar ground through its GIGA AI agent and predictive content scoring, but bundled into a unified SEO/AEO/GEO workflow rather than sold as discrete linking-adjacent features.
- InLinks has a genuine free tier and self-serve signup with no sales call required. Quattr has no self-serve trial; a free trial is only available after booking a demo.
- InLinks offers API access from its $49/month Freelancer plan. Quattr's published feature list doesn't break out API access as a separate line item, since everything is bundled into the enterprise contract.
InLinks and Quattr both build an internal linking layer on top of a model of a site's content, but that's close to where the similarity ends. InLinks is a focused, self-serve tool: crawl a site, map the entities, get linking suggestions and a content gap report, starting at $49 a month with a free tier to test it first. Quattr is an enterprise platform where internal linking is one module inside a much larger system that also tracks brand visibility across six AI engines, drafts content through an AI agent called GIGA, and scores pages for both traditional ranking and AI citation probability, sold entirely through a demo with no public pricing. Comparing them head to head on internal linking alone undersells Quattr and oversells InLinks, since a team buying Quattr is very rarely buying it for the linking feature specifically. The real question is whether you need a standalone linking tool or a unified SEO, AEO, and GEO system that happens to include one.
The tools at a glance
InLinks
Entity-based internal linking and knowledge graph optimization
InLinks crawls a site, identifies the entities each page covers, and builds a knowledge graph that decides which pages should link to each other. The logic is entity-based rather than keyword-based, so a page about "email deliverability" can link to one about "SPF records" without sharing an exact phrase. Links can be added manually from the recommendations or automatically through a JavaScript snippet.
Content gap analysis and schema markup generation sit on top of the linking engine. Content gap analysis compares entity coverage against competitors and reference sources to flag missing topics; schema generation writes structured data from the entities InLinks has already identified, without manual per-page setup.
Pricing is self-serve throughout: a free plan to test the core linking automation, $49/month for one site, $196/month for multiple sites, and custom Enterprise pricing for larger needs. There's no sales call required to start, and API access is included from the Freelancer tier.
| Feature | Free Free | Freelancer $49/month | Agency $196/month | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal linking automation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Knowledge graph | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Content gap analysis | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Schema markup generation | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API access | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Number of sites | 1 | 1 | Multiple | Custom |
Quattr
Unified SEO, AEO, and GEO platform powered by AI agent GIGA for ranking in Google, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Mode
Quattr is built around GIGA, an AI agent that coordinates content research, drafting, optimization, and publishing across both traditional search and AI answer engines. The GEO module tracks how a brand appears in responses from ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode, and Google AI Overviews, using real consumer-facing AI responses rather than API lookups, alongside citation share, sentiment, and competitor presence.
Internal linking is one module inside that system. Quattr crawls a site, generates vector embeddings of every page, and builds an internal link structure automatically, updating it as new content is published. It's comparable in outcome to what InLinks does, but it's not sold or priced as a standalone linking tool; it's a feature inside a platform that also handles keyword research, content drafting, and AI citation tracking.
There's no public pricing and no self-serve signup; access requires booking a demo. Customers include Simpplr, Men's Wearhouse, and Housing.com, and the platform is rated 4.9/5 on G2 across 65 reviews, which points to a mid-market and enterprise buyer, not a freelancer testing a linking tool on one site.
| Feature | Enterprise Contact for pricing |
|---|---|
| Demo required | Yes |
| GIGA AI agent | Yes |
| Internal linking AI | Yes |
| AI engines tracked for GEO | 6+ |
| Predictive content scoring | Yes |
| Free trial included with demo | Yes |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | InLinks | Quattr |
|---|---|---|
| Core linking logic | Entity and topic relationship matching | Vector embeddings of every page, rebuilt automatically |
| Sold as a standalone linking tool | Yes | No (bundled inside a unified SEO/AEO/GEO platform) |
| Knowledge graph / vector-based page mapping | Yes | Yes (vector-based, not entity-graph) |
| Content gap analysis | Yes | Not a named standalone feature (covered via GIGA discovery) |
| Schema markup generation | Yes | Not a named standalone feature |
| AI engines tracked for brand citations | None (does not track AI chatbot citations) | 6+ (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode) |
| AI content drafting agent | No | Yes (GIGA) |
| Predictive content scoring | No | Yes |
| API access | Yes (from Freelancer plan) | Not broken out (bundled in enterprise contract) |
| Self-serve signup | Yes | No (demo required) |
| Free tier / free trial | Free tier available | Free trial only after booking a demo |
| Starting price | $49/month | Contact for pricing |
Need AI visibility monitoring without buying an entire enterprise SEO platform?
InLinks doesn't track AI chatbot citations at all, and Quattr only offers its GEO module bundled inside a demo-only enterprise contract with no public pricing. AI Peekaboo tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode on a self-serve plan starting at $50 per month, with a read and write API included on every tier and no sales call required to start. If AI visibility is the actual goal rather than a bundled add-on to a much larger content platform, it's worth evaluating on its own.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
InLinksQuattrInLinksQuattrInLinksQuattrInLinksThis isn't really a linking-tool-versus-linking-tool comparison, even though both products build an internal link structure from a model of page content. InLinks is priced and sold as a linking and knowledge graph tool for teams with a defined, narrow need. Quattr's internal linking AI is a genuinely capable feature, but it only makes sense to buy Quattr for it if you also want the GEO tracking, GIGA content agent, and predictive scoring that come bundled with it, since there's no way to buy just the linking piece.
Bottom line
Choose InLinks if internal linking, knowledge graph visualization, and content gap analysis are the actual problem you're solving, and you want to start today without a sales conversation. Choose Quattr if you're already committed to tracking AI visibility across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity and want internal linking folded into that same enterprise platform rather than run as a separate tool. If AI visibility tracking is the primary goal and you don't want to buy an entire enterprise SEO platform to get it, a dedicated GEO tool with self-serve pricing is a better starting point than either of these.
Frequently asked questions
Is Quattr worth it just for the internal linking AI feature, compared to InLinks?
Quattr isn't sold or priced as a standalone linking tool, so buying it only for internal linking is a poor use of an enterprise, demo-only contract. InLinks costs $49 per month, is self-serve, and does the linking and knowledge graph work directly, which makes it the more sensible choice if linking is genuinely the only problem you're solving.
Does InLinks track brand visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity the way Quattr does?
InLinks does not track brand mentions in AI chatbot answers at all; it states this directly in its own FAQ and focuses entirely on entity coverage, internal linking, and schema markup. Quattr tracks brand citations across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode as a core part of its GEO module.
How does Quattr's pricing compare to InLinks for a small team?
InLinks publishes its pricing openly, from a free tier through $196 per month for multiple sites. Quattr has no public pricing at all and requires booking a demo before you get a quote, which makes it a poor fit for a small team that wants to compare costs before a sales conversation.
What is Quattr's GIGA AI agent and does InLinks have an equivalent?
GIGA is Quattr's AI agent that coordinates content research, drafting, optimization, and publishing across both Google Search and AI answer engines in one workflow. InLinks has no equivalent agent; it focuses specifically on entity mapping, internal linking, content gap analysis, and schema generation rather than content drafting.
Can I try Quattr before booking a demo, the way I can try InLinks for free?
InLinks has a genuine free tier you can sign up for directly with no sales conversation. Quattr has no self-serve trial; access requires booking a demo first, after which a free trial becomes available according to its own pricing page.
Which tool is better for an enterprise that needs both internal linking and AI citation tracking in one platform?
Quattr is the better fit for that combined need, since its internal linking AI and GEO tracking across six AI engines live in the same platform and workflow. InLinks would require pairing with a separate AI visibility tool to cover the citation-tracking half, since it doesn't track AI answers at all.