INX Social vs Typefully in 2026: AI visual production versus writing-first publishing
INX Social combines AI video, image, carousel, and campaign creation with scheduling for nine networks. Typefully is the better editorial desk for writers publishing across X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, Mastodon, and Substack Notes, with a public API and MCP workflow.
INX Social
Typefully- INX Social supports Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, Threads, Bluesky, and X, while Typefully natively publishes to X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, Mastodon, and Substack Notes.
- INX Social Creator costs £18.99 per month for five accounts and 300 shared AI credits. Typefully Creator costs $99 per year for one social set and 1,000 posts per month.
- INX Social AI Campaign creates 10, 15, 20, or 30 text, image, or mixed posts that can move into Bulk Scheduler.
- Typefully provides a public API, Zapier, an OAuth-based MCP server, and Agent Skills for creating and managing drafts, media, schedules, and publication.
- Typefully Business is priced per social set, so agencies should model every client account. INX Social increases connected-account capacity from five on Creator to 50 on Agency.
- Neither profile documents a unified social inbox or published client-approval workflow for INX Social; Typefully Business does document shared teams, roles, and permissions.
Choose INX Social when the bottleneck is making a steady supply of visual social assets, not refining a text-led editorial process. Its £18.99-per-month Creator plan joins AI Campaign, image and video tools, Bulk Scheduler, and analytics for up to five connected accounts. Typefully takes the opposite route. Its $99-per-year Creator plan is an economical writing, preview, scheduling, and analytics workspace for one social set, then Business adds shared teams, permissions, and workflow integrations. Neither is a broad social-care platform. The meaningful decision is whether the team needs to produce more visual material for Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, and related networks, or write and reuse better posts across professional and text-led channels.
The tools at a glance
INX Social
AI video, image, campaign, scheduling, and analytics workspace for visual social publishing
INX Social is a production-led scheduler. It connects nine networks, then places an AI Content Studio beside the calendar and analytics rather than expecting a team to create every asset elsewhere. The useful feature for a small brand is AI Campaign: it can prepare a 10, 15, 20, or 30-post text, image, or mixed sequence, optionally using website grounding, and pass the saved sequence to Bulk Scheduler. The calendar shows drafts, scheduled posts, published posts, and failures, giving a campaign owner a practical queue to inspect.
Its AI tools cover captions, rewrites, hashtags, calls to action, alt text, images, carousels, UGC-style ads, stock video, and a Video Studio with text-to-video, image-to-video, and supported reference workflows. This does not mean every output has the same cost. The published plans use a shared AI-credit balance, and higher-cost video models consume more credits. A team should therefore test its usual video workflow during the seven-day trial instead of treating the credit allowance as a promised number of finished clips.
Creator provides five connected accounts, unlimited scheduling, Full Analytics, and 300 monthly credits for £18.99. Pro raises that to 12 accounts and 900 credits for £34.99, while Agency lists 50 accounts and 4,000 credits for £99.99. INX Social is less suited to a workflow requiring a documented public API, third-party integrations, a shared engagement inbox, or formal approvals, because those capabilities are not described on its public product pages.
| Feature | Trial £0 for 7 days | Creator £18.99/month | Pro £34.99/month | Business £59.99/month | Agency £99.99/month |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connected accounts | Up to 2 | Up to 5 | Up to 12 | Up to 25 | Up to 50 |
| Shared AI credits | 20 | 300/month | 900/month | 2,000/month | 4,000/month |
| Scheduling and Full Analytics | 50 destination publications | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bulk Scheduler and AI suite | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Typefully
Writing-first scheduler with detailed X analytics, collaboration, API, Zapier, MCP, and agent workflows
Typefully starts with the draft rather than the asset factory. Its editor supports comments, @mentions, shared draft links, tags, media, AI alt text, LinkedIn PDF carousels, and platform-specific previews. One draft can be adapted for X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, Mastodon, and Substack Notes. The calendar distinguishes planned work from a scheduled draft that will auto-publish, and supports drag-and-drop, queue slots, and natural-language dates. That is a better fit for a ghostwriter or founder building a repeatable written voice.
The product is also unusually open to workflow tooling. Its bearer-token API manages social sets, drafts, media, tags, comments, queues, scheduling, and publication. Zapier supplies triggers and publishing actions, while MCP and Agent Skills can work with drafts, review comments, media, and queues through compatible clients. Business adds unlimited team members, roles and permissions, Slack publish notifications, and up to 50 social sets. Those are operational advantages when editorial work moves through several people before a post goes live.
Free permits 10 posts monthly without analytics or AI writing. Creator is annual-only at $99 per year for one social set, 1,000 posts per month, AI usage, analytics, and API access. Business costs $20 monthly per social set or $216 annually per set for 1,500 posts monthly. That per-set charge is sensible for a few brands but needs explicit agency budgeting, and the native network list remains intentionally weaker for Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, YouTube, and Facebook-heavy calendars.
| Feature | Free $0/month | Creator $99/year, annual billing only | Business $20/month per social set or $216/year per social set |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social sets | 1 | 1 | Up to 50 |
| Publishing allowance | 10 posts/month | 1,000 posts/month | 1,500 posts/month |
| Analytics and AI writing | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API, Zapier, MCP, and Agent Skills | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Teams, roles, and permissions | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | INX Social | Typefully |
|---|---|---|
| Native publishing networks | Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, Threads, Bluesky, X | X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads, Mastodon, Substack Notes |
| Visual AI production | AI Campaign, image, carousel, UGC ad, stock video, and multi-model video tools | AI writing and image descriptions, not an AI video suite |
| Writing and previews | Captions, rewrites, hashtags, CTA, and alt text | Comments, mentions, previews, carousels, threads, and platform adaptations |
| Bulk or campaign scheduling | Bulk Scheduler and 10 to 30-post AI Campaigns | Calendar, queues, planned and scheduled drafts |
| Detailed analytics focus | Full Analytics on all plans; history and export limits not published | Detailed metrics documented primarily for X |
| API and automation | No customer-facing API or integration list published | Public API, Zapier, MCP, and Agent Skills |
| Team roles | Not verified on public pages | Business: roles and permissions |
| Published starting price | £18.99/month | $99/year |
| Documented inbox and approvals | Not verified on public pages | Shared drafts and comments; no unified social inbox published |
Which should you choose?
INX SocialINX SocialTypefullyINX Social is the more coherent choice when content production is what holds the calendar back. It gives a visual team one place to make, batch, schedule, and review social material across a broader consumer-network list. Typefully wins when the product of the work is a well-written post and the team needs a serious editorial workflow around it. Its integrations and permissions are not incidental extras: they make it the safer purchase for a publishing process connected to other software or agents.
Bottom line
Buy INX Social Creator when five accounts, 300 shared credits, and a visual-content pipeline solve the immediate problem. Move to Pro only when the 12-account allowance or 900 credits are actually needed. Choose Typefully Creator for one writer publishing frequently to its supported text-led platforms. Choose Typefully Business when shared teams, roles, Slack notifications, or several social sets justify the per-set cost. Do not choose either product as a substitute for a documented multi-channel customer-service inbox.
Frequently asked questions
Should a creator choose INX Social or Typefully for Instagram and LinkedIn content in 2026?
A creator should choose INX Social when Instagram is central and they need AI images, video, campaign batches, and scheduling across visual networks. Typefully is the better LinkedIn choice when writing, draft review, platform-specific previews, and cross-posting to text-led networks matter more than media generation.
Does Typefully have automation that INX Social does not publish?
Typefully publishes a bearer-token API, Zapier integration, OAuth-based MCP server, and Agent Skills that can manage drafts, media, queues, scheduling, and publication. INX Social does not document an equivalent customer-facing API or third-party integration list on its public product pages.
How should an agency compare INX Social and Typefully pricing for multiple clients?
An agency should compare INX Social by connected-account allowance and Typefully Business by social-set count, because the products package capacity differently. INX Social Agency lists 50 accounts for £99.99 monthly, while Typefully Business is priced per social set and permits up to 50 sets.
Can INX Social create a month of social posts from one campaign?
INX Social can generate a 10, 15, 20, or 30-post text, image, or mixed AI Campaign and send the saved sequence into Bulk Scheduler. The team still needs to review the output and credit use, particularly when the campaign includes more expensive video-generation work.
Which tool is better for an X-first ghostwriter using AI agents?
Typefully is better for an X-first ghostwriter using AI agents because it combines a writing-focused editor, X-oriented analytics, shared drafts, a public API, MCP, and Agent Skills. INX Social supports X but is organised around broader visual production and does not publish comparable integration access.
Reviewed by Filipe Lins DuarteCo-Founder & CEOVast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.
Checked by John RiceCo-Founder & CTO15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.
Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.