JetOctopus vs Screpy in 2026: enterprise log intelligence vs a $10-a-month audit dashboard
JetOctopus ingests server logs to prove how Googlebot and GPTBot actually crawl a large site, starting at 293 EUR a month. Screpy bundles auditing, rank tracking, and uptime monitoring into one $10 plan for teams that were never going to buy JetOctopus in the first place.
JetOctopus
Screpy- JetOctopus tracks more than 40 bots, including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot, through direct server log ingestion. Screpy has no log analysis or bot tracking of any kind.
- Screpy starts at $10/month with no user or project caps. JetOctopus starts at 293 EUR/month, also with no user or project limits, but at a scale built for large sites rather than small client rosters.
- Screpy includes keyword rank tracking and uptime monitoring on every plan. JetOctopus's published feature set includes neither.
- Neither tool offers a straightforward API on a low-cost plan: Screpy has no API on any plan, while JetOctopus bundles API-style access across its modules but only at enterprise volume pricing.
- Screpy includes white-label PDF reports from its $30 Pro tier. JetOctopus's feature set does not mention white-label reporting at all.
- JetOctopus crawls at up to 250 pages per second with a dedicated JavaScript renderer for zero-content page detection. Screpy's audit depth is intentionally lighter, built for a monthly health check rather than large-scale technical crawling.
JetOctopus and Screpy technically share a category, technical SEO, but they are not really competing for the same buyer. JetOctopus is a heavyweight platform for large or complex sites: server log analysis across 40+ bots including GPTBot and ClaudeBot, a JavaScript crawler running at up to 250 pages per second, 16+ months of Google Search Console history, and no user or project limits, priced from 293 EUR a month billed annually. Screpy is built for the opposite end of the market: website auditing, rank tracking, page speed, and uptime monitoring bundled into a single $10-a-month plan with unlimited projects and team members, aimed at freelancers and small businesses who want one cheap subscription instead of four. Comparing them mostly clarifies which one your site has actually outgrown, if it ever fit Screpy's scope at all.
The tools at a glance
JetOctopus
SEO crawler and log analyzer for large sites that combines crawl data, server logs, GSC, and GA4 into one platform with no seat or project limits
JetOctopus solves a problem Screpy never attempts: proving what bots actually do on a large site, at the URL level, over time. The log analyzer ingests server files directly and shows which pages Googlebot, GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and dozens of other bots are hitting, at what frequency, and where crawl budget is wasted on pages that will never rank or get cited.
That sits alongside a JavaScript crawler flagging zero-content pages after rendering, a GSC integration holding more than 16 months of history, GA4 connectivity, and an AI internal linker reporting up to 30% crawl efficiency gains. Pricing is volume-based, 293 EUR a month for the base 500K plan, with unlimited users and projects on every tier, a structure built for enterprise teams and agencies managing large or numerous sites.
What JetOctopus does not do is anything resembling a lightweight, affordable audit dashboard. There is no rank tracker, no uptime monitoring, and no free trial listed, and the modular EUR-based pricing takes real calculation to understand. A freelancer with a handful of small client sites gets nothing from JetOctopus that justifies the cost or the learning curve.
| Feature | 500K Plan 293 EUR/month (billed annually) | Add-on: Crawl from 138 EUR/month | Add-on: Logs from 86 EUR/month | Add-on: GSC from 43 EUR/month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crawl pages included | 500K (or 250K JS) | Up to 10M+ | N/A | N/A |
| Log lines included | 2M | N/A | Up to 50M | N/A |
| GSC properties | 3 | N/A | N/A | Up to 1,000 |
| User limits | None | None | None | None |
| Project limits | None | None | None | None |
| AI bot tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Screpy
AI-powered SEO platform combining site audits, rank tracking, page speed monitoring, and uptime checks from $10 a month
Screpy takes the opposite approach: instead of proving crawl behavior with server logs, it bundles a lighter website audit, keyword rank tracking, page speed and Core Web Vitals, and uptime monitoring into a single $10-a-month plan with unlimited projects and unlimited team members. For a freelancer or small business owner, that is real operational coverage without a JetOctopus-sized budget or learning curve.
The AI-assisted audit explains issues in plain language rather than raw crawl errors, which helps non-technical users act on results without interpreting log files or bot behavior data the way JetOctopus's platform assumes you can. White-label PDF reports are available from the $30 Pro tier, unusually accessible for that price, letting small agencies hand clients a branded deliverable.
The trade-offs are depth and stability, not price. There is no API on any plan, the crawl and audit depth is noticeably thinner than a dedicated crawler, and the platform is currently mid-rebuild, with the vendor signaling a significant update in progress. None of that changes the fact that Screpy is solving a completely different problem than JetOctopus, at a completely different scale.
| Feature | Lite $10/month | Pro $30/month | Advanced $59/month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly credits | 2,500 | 8,000 | 30,000 |
| Unlimited projects | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Unlimited team members | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rank tracker | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor tracking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White-label PDF reports | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | JetOctopus | Screpy |
|---|---|---|
| Core function | Crawl, server log analysis, and GSC/GA4 unification for large sites | Budget all-in-one audit, rank tracking, speed, and uptime dashboard |
| Server log analysis | Yes, core feature | No |
| AI bot tracking (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) | Yes, 40+ bots including GPTBot and ClaudeBot | No |
| Full site-wide SEO crawling | Yes | Yes, lighter crawl depth |
| Keyword rank tracking | No | Yes |
| Uptime monitoring | No | Yes |
| GSC integration | Yes, 16+ months of data | Not documented |
| White-label reporting | Not documented | Yes (Pro plan and above) |
| API access | Included across modules | No, on any plan |
| User / project limits | None on any plan | Unlimited projects and team members |
| Free trial | Not listed | Yes |
| Starting price | 293 EUR/mo | $10/mo |
Which should you choose?
JetOctopusScrepyJetOctopusScrepyJetOctopusScrepyJetOctopusThe honest read here is that these tools were never really competing for the same buyer. JetOctopus is an intelligence layer for teams that already know they have crawl budget or indexation problems on a large site and need log-verified proof of what bots are doing, at a price that reflects that scale. Screpy is a budget consolidation play for freelancers and small businesses who would otherwise be paying for four separate tools, auditing, rank tracking, speed, uptime, and would never need or afford JetOctopus's log analysis in the first place. Someone comparing them directly has usually mis-scoped the search; the real question is closer to "has my site outgrown a $10 dashboard yet."
Bottom line
Use Screpy if you are a freelancer or small business managing a handful of sites and want auditing, rank tracking, and uptime monitoring in one affordable plan, it costs less per month than a single JetOctopus add-on. Move to JetOctopus only once the problem has become genuinely about crawl budget, log-verified bot behavior, or indexation at scale on a large or complex site, at which point 293 EUR a month buys a depth of data Screpy was never built to provide.
Frequently asked questions
Is JetOctopus overkill for a small business with one website?
Yes, almost certainly. JetOctopus is priced and built for large or complex sites, starting at 293 EUR a month with volume-based add-ons for crawl, logs, and GSC data. A small business with one website is better served by Screpy's $10-a-month Lite plan, which covers auditing, rank tracking, and uptime monitoring without the log analysis a small site does not need.
Does Screpy track AI bots like GPTBot the way JetOctopus does?
Screpy has no server log analysis or bot-tracking capability of any kind. JetOctopus tracks more than 40 bots, including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot, through direct server log ingestion, which is a core feature of the platform rather than an add-on.
Which tool has an API, JetOctopus or Screpy?
JetOctopus includes API-style integrations across its modules, though only accessible at its enterprise-scale pricing. Screpy has no API on any plan, Lite, Pro, or Advanced, so teams that need to pipe audit or rank data into a custom dashboard cannot do it through Screpy at all.
Can Screpy handle the crawl volume of a large ecommerce or enterprise site?
Not really. Screpy's audit depth and crawl limits are noticeably thinner than a dedicated crawler, designed for a monthly health check rather than continuous large-scale technical SEO work. JetOctopus is purpose-built for that scale, crawling at up to 250 pages per second with log-verified data on top, which is the gap Screpy was never designed to close.
Why is JetOctopus so much more expensive than Screpy?
The two tools solve problems at completely different scales. Screpy is a lightweight dashboard bundling four functions at a budget price for freelancers and small businesses. JetOctopus ingests full server log files, crawls at high volume, and unifies crawl data, logs, GSC history, and GA4 for sites with millions of URLs, which is why its base plan starts at 293 EUR a month with unlimited users and projects included.
Does either tool offer white-label reporting for client work?
Screpy does, from its $30 Pro tier, which is unusually accessible pricing for white-label PDF reports. JetOctopus's published feature list does not mention white-label delivery, so agencies using it for client work are typically reporting through their own dashboards or manual exports instead.