Meta Ad Library vs Use Poach in 2026: public ad discovery vs customer-owned capture
Meta Ad Library is the free first-party place to search ads currently running across Meta technologies. Use Poach starts after discovery, saving selected Facebook Ad Library findings to local files or a customer-owned Notion database for a $67 lifetime Pro license.
Meta Ad Library lets users search ads currently running across Meta technologies by keyword or advertiser without a published subscription price.
Use Poach works from public Facebook Ad Library findings and does not publish its own advertiser search, discovery database, or automatic competitor watchlist.
Use Poach Free saves the selected ad media and a metadata screenshot card to local disk; Pro costs $67 for lifetime access and adds Notion sync.
Meta says it retains social-issue, election, and political ads for seven years, EU ads for one year, and qualifying UK ads for one year.
Use Poach says its screenshot card can include visible headline, primary copy, CTA, advertiser, landing URL, dates, and researcher-applied tags.
Meta’s Ad Library Report and API serve published political, issue, EU, and UK scopes, not general commercial ad-performance reporting.
Use Poach says Pro creates a 13-column Notion database and sends each selected capture as a native Notion row with its screenshot.
These tools work best together, but they are not interchangeable. Meta Ad Library is where a researcher searches a live public record by advertiser or keyword. It also carries defined political, issue, EU, UK, and branded-content transparency routes. Use Poach does not replace that search. Its Chrome extension captures an ad a user has already found in Facebook Ad Library, saves its image or video and a metadata screenshot card locally, then adds optional native Notion storage through a $67 lifetime Pro license. Use Meta Ad Library when the immediate need is discovery and first-party verification. Add Use Poach when useful examples are getting lost in browser tabs and a local, tagged record or Notion database will genuinely be reused in creative briefing. Neither product discovers performance, proves why an ad works, or reports a competitor’s commercial spend and conversion results.
The tools at a glance
Meta Ad Library
Meta’s public search and transparency library for live advertiser creative, regulated-ad records, and paid-partnership research
Meta Ad Library is the discovery and verification layer in this comparison. Its public interface lets a user choose a location and ad category, then search ads currently running across Meta technologies by advertiser or keyword. It is the proper primary source for a strategist who wants to see what Meta makes public about live creative without needing an advertiser account. The output is observation, not an account export: it does not reveal a commercial advertiser’s conversions, revenue, bids, targeting strategy, full campaign build, or profit.
Its historical routes are defined by policy rather than by a blanket promise to save every old ad. Meta says it keeps social-issue, election, and political ads for seven years, ads delivered anywhere in the European Union for one year, and UK ads for one year when they ran after July 1, 2025. The Ad Library Report supports exploration and download of political and issue-ad data, while the API supports custom searches within its published political, issue, UK, and EU scope. Meta also offers a distinct branded-content search for disclosed paid partnerships.
Meta Ad Library has no published subscription price, but it also has no stated boards, research tags, local exports for ordinary commercial captures, automatic monitoring, or shared creative workflow. It is where a researcher should establish public evidence, then save and organise the material in an appropriate workspace. Use Poach is one lightweight way to do that for selected Facebook Ad Library examples. The library itself remains essential because Use Poach cannot find the initial result for you.
| Feature |
|---|
Use Poach
Chrome extension that turns selected Facebook Ad Library findings into local assets or customer-owned Notion records
Use Poach is a capture tool, not an alternative source of ads. Once a user has found an item in the public Facebook Ad Library, its Free workflow saves the ad image or video plus a screenshot card to local disk. The vendor says the card records visible headline, primary copy, CTA, advertiser, landing URL, dates, and tags added by the researcher, with metadata embedded in the PNG for ExifTool reading. It is a practical answer to the familiar problem of finding a strong example and then losing the browser tab or the surrounding context.
The Pro plan is a $67 lifetime Notion upgrade rather than an intelligence subscription. It creates a 13-column database in the customer’s workspace, then sends each selected capture there as a native row with its screenshot. Users can tag work by niche, awareness stage, and lead type, and Use Poach says it deduplicates Notion records. Its privacy policy says the Notion token stays in Chrome extension storage and is sent only to Notion’s API for user-triggered actions; it also says the licensing service does not receive captured ads, screenshots, Notion content, or Notion tokens.
The limitations should shape the purchase. Use Poach has no published advertiser search, saved-search alerts, automated monitoring, proprietary database, team approval flow, commercial reporting, or coverage beyond the public Facebook Ad Library. It cannot extend Meta’s historical retention rules and it cannot reveal performance. Free is enough for local collection. Pay once for Pro only if the team will make Notion into a real working reference library instead of another place where unreviewed captures disappear.
| Feature | Free $0 | Pro $67 lifetime |
|---|---|---|
| Capture Facebook Ad Library ads to disk | ✓ | ✓ |
| Save ad image or video | ✓ | ✓ |
| Metadata screenshot card | ✓ | ✓ |
| Niche, awareness-stage, and lead-type tags | ✓ | ✓ |
| Notion database sync | ✗ | ✓ |
| 13-column Notion database creation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Recurring subscription | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Discover and verify public Meta ads | Preserve manually discovered Facebook Ad Library examples |
| Starting price | No published subscription | Free, Pro $67 lifetime |
| Live Meta advertiser and keyword search | Yes | No, discovery happens in Meta Ad Library |
| First-party public Meta record | Yes | No, it captures the public result |
| Political, issue, EU, and UK transparency scope | Yes, defined retention and access rules | No separate archive or retention policy |
| Capture selected ad media | View public records, no stated local workflow | Yes, local media and screenshot card |
| Research tags and local ownership | Not published | Yes |
| Notion storage | No | Pro, customer-owned workspace |
| Automated monitoring and alerts | Not published | No |
| Commercial performance data | No | No |
Which should you choose?
Meta Ad Library and Use Poach are consecutive steps, not rival databases. The first tells you what Meta publicly shows for a live search or its defined transparency routes. The second helps you keep a selected finding in a local folder or your own Notion workspace. Meta remains the primary record, and Use Poach remains deliberately narrow. The productive choice for many researchers is not an either-or purchase: use Meta for discovery and verification, then use Use Poach only when the saved collection will make future creative analysis or briefing more useful.
Bottom line
Use Meta Ad Library first for live advertiser and keyword discovery, primary-source checks, and its stated regulated-ad or branded-content records. Add Use Poach Free to retain individual findings locally without recurring cost. Buy Pro for $67 only if native Notion rows, tags, and search become part of the team’s real creative-reference habit. Neither tool supplies private campaign results, competitor alerts, or a commercial cross-network intelligence database.
Frequently asked questions
Should I use Meta Ad Library or Use Poach to find a competitor’s current Facebook ads?
You should use Meta Ad Library to find a competitor’s current Facebook ads because it is Meta’s public advertiser and keyword search for ads currently running across Meta technologies. Use Poach begins after that discovery step. Its extension captures a selected public finding, but it does not publish its own search database or advertiser-monitoring function.
What does Use Poach save from a Facebook Ad Library ad on the free plan?
Use Poach Free saves the selected ad image or video and a metadata screenshot card to local disk. The vendor says the card can include visible headline, primary copy, CTA, advertiser, landing URL, dates, and researcher tags. That makes it useful for a personal swipe file without needing a paid hosted account.
Is Use Poach Pro worth $67 for a small paid-social team using Notion?
Use Poach Pro is worth $67 for a small team only when its Notion database becomes an active creative-reference system. Pro creates a 13-column customer-owned Notion database and saves captures as native rows with screenshots. If the team will not tag, search, and reuse those rows, the Free local-capture workflow is the better choice.
Can Use Poach save old political or EU ads that Meta Ad Library retains?
Use Poach can capture a public Facebook Ad Library result that a user can access, but it does not create its own historical archive or change Meta’s availability rules. Meta states seven-year retention for social-issue, election, and political ads, one year for EU ads, and one year for qualifying UK ads. Use Poach’s role is preservation after manual discovery.
Can Meta Ad Library or Use Poach show a competitor’s ad spend and conversion results?
Neither Meta Ad Library nor Use Poach can show a competitor’s private commercial ad spend and conversion results. Meta’s published spend and impression information belongs to defined political and issue-ad transparency contexts. Use Poach stores visible public ad context and researcher tags, not advertiser account analytics.
Vast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.
15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.
Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.

