Comparison

Octoboard vs Whatagraph in 2026: budget multi-domain analytics vs premium data-blending platform with an API

Octoboard covers marketing, web, PPC, and ecommerce analytics from around $30 a month. Whatagraph blends 40+ data sources with source groups and a public API, starting at €199 a month with no free tier.

Updated July 3, 2026
Octoboard
Whatagraph
Key takeaways
  • Whatagraph includes a public API on every plan, including its entry-level Go tier. Octoboard has no REST API or MCP integration listed at any tier.
  • Octoboard starts around $30/month; Whatagraph starts at €199/month on an annual Go plan, over six times Octoboard's entry price for its lowest tier.
  • Octoboard has native ecommerce analytics for Stripe, Shopify, and WooCommerce, and web analytics with live heatmaps and B2B visitor ID by IP. Whatagraph has neither module; it is built around blending 40+ marketing data sources, not first-party web or ecommerce data.
  • Whatagraph's source groups let you combine multiple ad accounts or properties into one logical source without manual rollups, useful for multi-location or franchise clients. Octoboard has no equivalent cross-account grouping feature.
  • Octoboard offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card. Whatagraph does not publicly advertise a self-serve trial; evaluation typically requires a demo conversation.
  • Octoboard includes a built-in SEO rank tracker on every plan. Whatagraph has no organic rank-tracking module; its strength is aggregating and blending existing marketing platform data, not tracking rankings itself.
  • Both support white-label delivery, but Whatagraph adds a custom domain option, while Octoboard's white-label client portal is gated behind its Agency tier rather than included from the entry plan.

Octoboard and Whatagraph both promise to pull an agency's scattered marketing data into one place, but they sit at very different price points for different reasons. Octoboard is the budget-breadth option: marketing analytics with a rank tracker, web analytics with heatmaps, PPC cross-channel data, and ecommerce reporting for Stripe, Shopify, and WooCommerce, all self-serve from around $30 a month. Whatagraph is narrower in domain but deeper in data engineering: it connects and blends 40+ sources through source groups, ships a public API on every plan, and supports white-label delivery on a custom domain, starting at €199 a month with no free tier and no public trial. If your agency needs broad channel coverage on a budget, Octoboard fits. If your agency needs to combine data across many accounts and pipe it into other systems via API, Whatagraph is built for that, at roughly six to seven times Octoboard's starting price.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
OctoboardFrom ~$30/moAgencies with 5 to 50 clients that want marketing, web, PPC, and ecommerce analytics under one self-serve subscription at a budget-friendly price, without needing an API.
Whatagraph€199/monthMid-size to large agencies managing 15 or more client accounts with complex multi-channel data and a genuine need for API access or cross-account source grouping.

Octoboard

Multi-channel marketing analytics platform covering marketing, web analytics, PPC, and ecommerce with white-label client portals and BigQuery export

Full review →
Octoboard screenshot

Octoboard covers four distinct analytics domains under one subscription: Marketing Analytics with a rank tracker and embedded audits, Web Analytics with real-time dashboards and live heatmaps, PPC Data Analytics with cross-channel reporting, and Ecommerce Analytics for Stripe, WooCommerce, and Shopify. Each module has genuine depth, which is a different kind of breadth than Whatagraph's single, deep focus on blending marketing data sources.

OpenAI-powered data insights apply automatically to connected data, surfacing trends and anomalies without manual querying. It is a comparable idea to Whatagraph's AI data querying, but the entry point is different: Octoboard's AI layer works on data already flowing through its dashboards, while Whatagraph's AI querying is built for ad-hoc, natural-language exploration.

Price is Octoboard's clearest advantage. The Business tier starts around $30/month, and Agency, roughly $75/month, adds the white-label portal, web analytics, and BigQuery export. A 14-day trial requires no credit card. What is missing is any API: agencies wanting to pipe Octoboard data into a custom system, unlike Whatagraph, have no documented path to do it.

Pricing
Feature
Business
From ~$30/mo
Agency
From ~$75/mo
Enterprise
Custom
SEO rank tracker + embedded audits
OpenAI data insights
White-label client portal
Web analytics (heatmaps, B2B lead ID)
BigQuery / Looker Studio export
14-day free trial
Best for: Agencies with 5 to 50 clients that want marketing, web, PPC, and ecommerce analytics under one self-serve subscription at a budget-friendly price, without needing an API.

Whatagraph

Multi-source marketing data in one place, built for agencies that live and die by client reports

Full review →
Whatagraph screenshot

Whatagraph is built around consolidating data from 40+ sources, Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, HubSpot, Shopify, and more, into unified reports and dashboards. The distinguishing feature is source groups, which let you combine data from multiple ad accounts or properties into a single metric without writing SQL, particularly useful for multi-location and franchise clients whose data is spread across many accounts that need both individual tracking and aggregation.

A public API ships from the Go plan and up, letting agencies programmatically pull reporting data, trigger report generation, or embed Whatagraph data into a broader stack. AI-powered natural language querying is also included, letting users ask questions in plain text and get chart answers, though it is positioned for ad-hoc exploration rather than production reporting.

The cost of that depth is price and access. There is no free tier and no publicly advertised trial; the Go plan starts at €199/month annually or €249/month monthly, and Max at €699/month is a steep jump that adds a dedicated Customer Success Manager and advanced source groups. There is also no ecommerce or first-party web analytics module: Whatagraph blends existing marketing platform data rather than generating its own web or ecommerce tracking.

Pricing
Feature
Go (Annual)
€199/month
Go (Monthly)
€249/month
Max
€699/month
Prime
Contact for pricing
Data sources40+40+40+40+
API access
Source groupsLimitedLimitedAdvancedAdvanced
White-label, custom domain
AI data querying
Dedicated CSM
Best for: Mid-size to large agencies managing 15 or more client accounts with complex multi-channel data and a genuine need for API access or cross-account source grouping.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
Octoboard
Whatagraph
Core product scopeMarketing, web, PPC, and ecommerce analyticsMulti-source marketing data blending and reporting
Data sourcesPer-module native integrations40+
API accessNo REST API or MCP listedYes, from Go plan
Source groups / cross-account rollupsNoYes, advanced on Max and Prime
SEO rank trackingYes, on all plansNo
Web analytics (heatmaps, visitor ID)Yes, from Agency planNo
Ecommerce analyticsYes (Stripe, WooCommerce, Shopify)No
White-label, custom domainYes, from Agency plan (no custom domain stated)Yes, custom domain, all plans
AI feature typeOpenAI commentary on connected dataAI natural-language data querying
Free trialYes, 14 days, no credit cardNo public self-serve trial
Starting price~$30/mo€199/mo

Which should you choose?

Agencies on a tighter budget wanting broad analytics coverageOctoboard
Agencies needing a public API to pipe data into other systemsWhatagraph
Teams managing multi-location or franchise clients across many ad accountsWhatagraph
Agencies wanting native ecommerce or web analytics without a separate toolOctoboard
Mid-size to large agencies with 15+ complex client accountsWhatagraph
Teams that want to trial the product before payingOctoboard
Agencies needing white-label delivery on a custom domain from day oneWhatagraph

The gap between these two is mostly about what each is optimized for. Octoboard optimizes for domain breadth at a low price: marketing, web, PPC, and ecommerce, all covered, none requiring a sales call. Whatagraph optimizes for data engineering depth at a premium price: source groups, a real API, and blending across 40+ sources for agencies whose reporting complexity has outgrown a simple dashboard tool. An agency that has not hit that complexity ceiling will find Whatagraph's price hard to justify; one that has will find Octoboard's lack of an API and source-grouping a real constraint.

Bottom line

Start the Octoboard trial if your agency needs broad channel coverage, marketing, web, PPC, ecommerce, at a price that does not require budget approval, and you can live without an API. Go with Whatagraph if your agency is managing complex, multi-account client data that needs source-group rollups or programmatic access via API, and €199 to €699 a month is a reasonable trade for recovering hours of manual data assembly. Agencies that need both budget-friendly breadth and an API will not find either tool a perfect fit on its own.

Frequently asked questions

Is Octoboard or Whatagraph cheaper for a small agency just getting started?

Octoboard is significantly cheaper at the entry point, starting around $30/month compared to Whatagraph's €199/month annual Go plan. For a small agency without a large budget for reporting tools, Octoboard covers marketing, web, PPC, and ecommerce analytics at a fraction of Whatagraph's starting price.

Does Octoboard have an API like Whatagraph does?

No. Octoboard does not list a REST API or MCP integration at any published tier. Whatagraph includes a public API from its entry-level Go plan, letting agencies programmatically pull reporting data or trigger report generation, which makes it the better fit for teams building custom data pipelines or embedding data into other systems.

What are Whatagraph's source groups and does Octoboard have anything similar?

Source groups let you combine multiple ad accounts or properties, for example five Google Ads accounts across different markets, into a single logical source for reporting without manual rollups. Octoboard has no equivalent cross-account grouping feature; its integrations operate per connected account rather than blending multiple accounts into one aggregated metric.

Can I try Whatagraph for free before committing, the way I can with Octoboard?

Not publicly. Whatagraph does not advertise a self-serve free trial; you typically book a demo to evaluate the platform, and a trial period may be offered afterward at the sales team's discretion. Octoboard offers a straightforward 14-day free trial with no credit card required.

Which tool is better for an agency with ecommerce clients on Shopify or WooCommerce?

Octoboard is the better fit, since it includes native Stripe, Shopify, and WooCommerce reporting with customer segmentation and retention analysis as part of its Ecommerce Analytics module. Whatagraph has no ecommerce-specific reporting module; it is built to blend existing marketing platform data rather than generate first-party ecommerce analytics.

Is Whatagraph worth the price jump over Octoboard for a mid-size agency?

It depends on complexity, not just client count. A mid-size agency managing 15 or more accounts with fragmented, multi-location data and a genuine need to pipe that data into other systems via API will likely get real value from Whatagraph's source groups and API access. An agency of similar size that just needs standard dashboards across marketing, web, and ecommerce channels will find Octoboard covers the same ground at roughly a sixth of the starting price.

Found this useful? Share it: