Profound vs Radarkit in 2026: Nine engines and crawler logs versus four platforms at $29/mo
Enterprise depth and structured onboarding, or the cheapest entry point with API access: which trade-off fits your workflow?
Profound
Radarkit- Profound tracks 9 AI engines including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, DeepSeek, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. Radarkit tracks 4: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. If breadth of engine coverage is the deciding factor, Profound wins by a wide margin.
- Radarkit Lite at $29/month is the cheapest paid entry point in the AI visibility category and includes API access on every paid plan. Profound Starter at $99/month tracks ChatGPT only. For teams with budget constraints, Radarkit is the lower-cost path.
- Profound is the only tool in this comparison that exposes AI crawler log access. You can see when GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers last visited specific pages on your site, which lets teams correlate crawl timing with citation behaviour. Radarkit does not expose this layer.
- API access is locked to Profound Enterprise custom contracts. Radarkit includes API access on every paid tier from $29/month. For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows that depend on programmatic data delivery on a standard plan, Radarkit is the practical answer.
- Profound requires a demo call before purchase and includes structured onboarding with a Customer Success Manager. Radarkit is fully self-serve, sign up and start tracking within a day. For teams that need to evaluate today and commit quickly, Radarkit is the lower-friction choice.
- Radarkit does not offer white-label delivery or branded client views on any tier. Profound also lacks white-label delivery. Both tools fall short for agencies managing multiple client brands under one account; if white-label is a hard requirement, look elsewhere.
- Neither tool covers Google AI Mode specifically. Profound covers Google AI Overviews; Radarkit covers neither Google AI surface. Teams whose audiences ask questions in Google search need to plan around this gap.
If you are weighing Profound against Radarkit, you are really choosing between two very different AI visibility tool comparison endpoints. Profound is the deepest platform available: 9 engines tracked, crawler log access showing when GPTBot and ClaudeBot visited your pages, and a built-in AEO content generation layer, but the entry price is $99/month for ChatGPT only, the API is locked to Enterprise contracts, and buying requires a demo call. Radarkit tracks 4 engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity) with API access on every paid tier starting at $29/month, but stops short of crawler logs, white-label delivery, and Google AI surface coverage. The right pick depends on whether your priority is the widest possible model coverage and crawler-level insight, or an affordable self-serve entry point with API access from day one.
The tools at a glance
Profound
Enterprise AI visibility with crawler log analysis and AEO content generation
Profound is the most feature-rich AI visibility platform available, tracking 9 engines across the tier stack: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, DeepSeek, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. The Starter plan covers ChatGPT only at $99/month, Growth expands to 3 engines at $399/month, and Enterprise covers up to 10 engines with custom pricing. No other tool in this comparison matches this breadth at the top of the market.
Two capabilities are unique to Profound. First, the crawler log layer shows when GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and other AI crawlers last visited specific pages on your site, letting teams correlate crawl timing with citation changes. Second, the Marketing Agents feature generates AEO-optimised content designed to close accuracy gaps surfaced by the analysis. For in-house content teams that want insight and execution in the same platform, those two layers together are the deciding capability.
The buying process is the trade-off. Profound requires a demo call before purchase, with structured onboarding and a Customer Success Manager once you are in. The API is locked to Enterprise custom contracts, there is no white-label delivery, and the platform is not designed for agencies managing multiple client brands under one account. Teams that need a self-serve tool running this week without a sales call will find the friction real, even if the feature depth justifies it.
| Feature | Starter $99/mo | Growth $399/mo | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Answer engines tracked | ChatGPT only | 3 engines | Up to 10 |
| Unique prompts tracked | 50 | 100 | Custom |
| Monthly responses analyzed | 1,500 | 9,000 | Custom |
| Team seats | 1 | 3 | Custom |
| CSV / JSON exports | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Agent credits/mo | 100 | 400 | Custom |
| SSO / SAML | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated Slack support | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Radarkit
AI brand monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with API access
Radarkit monitors brand mentions and citations across 4 AI engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. The platform tracks how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers, which sources the AI models cite, and how your visibility compares to competitors over time. The 4-platform scope is the defining feature: teams that prioritise Claude and Gemini coverage alongside the two biggest first-party AI search engines often shortlist Radarkit.
Where Radarkit stands out is on price. The Lite plan at $29/month is the lowest paid entry point in the AI visibility category, with API access included across all four paid tiers. The Growth tier at $79/month unlocks competitor benchmarking and citation source analysis, and the Pro tier at $139/month adds unlimited historical data. There is no free tier to evaluate before committing, which is worth noting for teams that prefer to test before subscribing.
The gaps to plan around are scope and delivery. Radarkit does not currently track Google AI Overviews or Google AI Mode, which matters for SEO teams whose audiences are asking questions in Google search. There is no white-label delivery or branded client view on any tier, so agencies delivering AI visibility reports to clients would need a separate reporting layer. For internal Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) tracking on a tight budget, Radarkit is a credible option.
| Feature | Lite $29/mo | Growth $79/mo | Pro $139/mo | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citation source analysis | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Historical trend data | 30 days | 90 days | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Profound | Radarkit |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, DeepSeek, Claude, Google AI Overviews | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes (Growth and up) |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Yes (brand accuracy gap analysis) | No |
| Category intelligence | Partial (prompt volume intelligence) | No |
| AEO content generation | Yes (Marketing Agents) | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | Yes | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Enterprise only | Yes, all paid plans |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | Limited | No |
| Starting price | $99/mo | $29/mo |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Profound and Radarkit?
Neither Profound nor Radarkit offers white-label delivery for agency client reporting on any plan, and Profound locks API access to enterprise contracts. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool for agencies with white-label reports, guest access links, and read and write API on every plan from $50/month Starter. For SEO and marketing agencies managing multiple clients, AI Peekaboo covers what neither tool delivers at standard pricing, with 5 AI surfaces including Google AI Mode.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
ProfoundRadarkitRadarkitProfoundRadarkitProfoundRadarkitProfound is the stronger answer when depth of coverage, crawler logs, and content generation are non-negotiable, but it costs more, gates the API to Enterprise, and requires a demo call. Radarkit is the stronger answer when affordability and API access on day one matter more than engine breadth. Both tools lack white-label delivery and Google AI Mode coverage, so agencies with multi-client needs should plan around that gap.
Bottom line
Profound and Radarkit sit at different ends of the AI visibility tool comparison spectrum. Profound answers how deeply you can map the relationship between AI models, crawlers, content, and citations once you have committed to a serious AI search programme. Radarkit answers how quickly you can get structured citation data into a custom reporting stack at a price point that fits an in-house or developer budget. Choose based on which side of that trade-off your programme sits on.
Frequently asked questions
How does Profound compare to Radarkit on AI engine coverage?
Profound tracks up to 9 engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, DeepSeek, Claude, and Google AI Overviews. Radarkit tracks 4: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. For teams that need Grok, DeepSeek, Copilot, or Meta AI coverage, Profound is the only choice in this AI visibility tool comparison.
Is Radarkit worth the cost for teams that need crawler log access?
No. Radarkit does not expose crawler log data showing when GPTBot and ClaudeBot visited your pages. If connecting AI crawler activity to citation behaviour is part of your programme, Radarkit is not the right tool and Profound is the answer.
How much does Radarkit cost compared to Profound?
Radarkit starts at $29/month on Lite, $79/month on Growth, and $139/month on Pro. Profound starts at $99/month for the Starter tier, which tracks ChatGPT only; Growth is $399/month for 3 engines, and Enterprise is custom. Radarkit is the cheaper entry point, but Profound covers more engines on every tier.
Which is best for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows, Profound or Radarkit?
For GEO workflows that depend on programmatic data delivery on a standard plan, Radarkit is the practical choice because the API is included from $29/month. Profound locks API access to Enterprise custom contracts, so programmatic data delivery on a standard plan is not available. For GEO workflows that need the widest engine coverage and crawler log data and can absorb Enterprise pricing, Profound wins.
Can I buy Profound or Radarkit without a sales call?
Radarkit is fully self-serve with no sales call required; you can sign up and start tracking today. Profound requires a demo call before purchase. If self-serve setup matters to your team, Radarkit is the lower-friction option.
Which tool is better for agencies managing multiple client brands?
Neither tool is designed for agency multi-client use. Both Profound and Radarkit lack white-label delivery and guest client access. For agencies delivering client-facing AI visibility reports, look at platforms built around agency workflows rather than choosing between these two.