Radarkit vs Ranksmith in 2026: API access from $29/mo versus published beta pricing with citation attribution
Cheapest entry point with API on every plan, or a $69/month beta platform with Grok, Claude, and citation extraction?
Radarkit
Ranksmith- Radarkit includes API access on every paid tier from $29/month. Ranksmith does not currently advertise API access on any tier. For programmatic data delivery on a standard plan, Radarkit is the practical answer.
- Ranksmith tracks 5 AI search engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, and Claude, with Grok and Claude on Enterprise tier. Radarkit tracks 4: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Ranksmith includes Grok and Claude at the top tier.
- Ranksmith is in public beta with a free trial on every tier and no credit card required. Radarkit does not currently offer a free tier or trial. For teams that prefer to evaluate before subscribing, Ranksmith is the lower-friction option.
- Ranksmith includes a citation extraction and source attribution layer for PR and review-acquisition workflows. Radarkit includes citation source identification on Growth and above but does not surface outreach contacts.
- Neither tool offers crawler log access, AEO content generation, or white-label delivery. Both are monitoring and reporting tools without agency delivery features.
- Radarkit is fully self-serve with no sales call. Ranksmith is self-serve with published pricing and a free trial. Both are accessible without procurement friction.
- For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows that need API access on the cheapest plan, Radarkit wins. For GEO workflows that need citation attribution and PR acquisition hooks, Ranksmith is the right choice.
If you are weighing Radarkit against Ranksmith, you are really choosing between two different AI visibility tool comparison endpoints. Radarkit is the cheapest paid entry point at $29/month with API access on every paid tier and 4 engines covered (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity), but lacks Google AI surface coverage and citation attribution. Ranksmith is a live, paying GEO platform in public beta that tracks up to 5 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Claude), starts at $69/month, and includes a citation-extraction layer for PR workflows. The right pick depends on whether you need API access and the lowest entry price, or a more structured citation attribution workflow with Grok and Claude on Enterprise tier.
The tools at a glance
Radarkit
AI brand monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with API access
Radarkit monitors brand mentions and citations across 4 AI engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. The platform tracks how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers, which sources the AI models cite, and how your visibility compares to competitors over time. The 4-platform scope is the defining feature: teams that prioritise Claude and Gemini coverage alongside the two biggest first-party AI search engines often shortlist Radarkit.
Where Radarkit stands out is on price and API access. The Lite plan at $29/month is the lowest paid entry point in the AI visibility category for a tool that includes API access across all four paid tiers. The Growth tier at $79/month unlocks competitor benchmarking and citation source analysis, and the Pro tier at $139/month adds unlimited historical data. For developers and analysts building custom reporting stacks, this combination is the deciding factor in this AI visibility tool comparison.
The gaps to plan around are scope and delivery. Radarkit does not currently track Google AI Overviews or Google AI Mode, which matters for SEO teams whose audiences are asking questions in Google search. There is no white-label delivery or branded client view on any tier, so agencies delivering AI visibility reports to clients would need a separate reporting layer. For internal Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) tracking on a tight budget, Radarkit is a credible option.
| Feature | Lite $29/mo | Growth $79/mo | Pro $139/mo | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citation source analysis | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Historical trend data | 30 days | 90 days | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Ranksmith
GEO platform tracking 5 AI search engines across prompts, competitors, and citations from $69/mo
Ranksmith is a Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) platform currently in public beta. It tracks brand presence across 5 AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, and Claude), with pricing starting at $69/month on Starter and scaling to $549/month on Enterprise. A free trial is offered on every paid tier with no credit card required, and there is a standalone Free AI Checker utility for one-off visibility queries without signup.
The product is built around three named modules: Prompt Prioritization, which scores every tracked prompt against current position, mention rate, and link rate; Competitor benchmarking, which surfaces share of voice and sentiment against named competitors in real time; and Source attribution, which extracts the citations AI models rely on so PR and content teams know where to focus review-acquisition and outreach. The citation-extraction layer is the most differentiated feature for teams that want to operationalise PR and link-building against AI visibility data.
The two real constraints are scope and API access. Grok and Claude coverage is Enterprise-only, so Starter and Pro miss those engines, and Google AI Overviews is not currently advertised at any tier. API access is not currently advertised on the public site. For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) teams that want citation attribution and PR workflows on a self-serve plan, Ranksmith is a credible mid-market option worth the free trial.
| Feature | Starter $69/mo | Pro $149/mo | Enterprise $549/mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompts | 25 | 60 | 150 |
| Competitors | 5 | 10 | 20 |
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Grok, Claude |
| Historical data | 6 months | 12 months | 24 months |
| Refresh rate | Daily | Daily | Daily |
| Advanced analytics | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| Free trial | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Radarkit | Ranksmith |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini (Pro), Grok + Claude (Enterprise) |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes (Growth and up) | Yes (up to 20 competitors) |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | No | No (prompt prioritization scoring only) |
| Category intelligence | No | No |
| AEO content generation | No | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Yes, all paid plans | Not advertised |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | No | No |
| Starting price | $29/mo | $69/mo |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Radarkit and Ranksmith?
Neither Radarkit nor Ranksmith includes white-label delivery on any tier, and Ranksmith has no API advertised on any plan. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool for agencies that need both read and write API and white-label delivery on every plan from $50/month Starter, with self-serve signup and no demo call. The Looker Studio connector and pay-per-prompt pricing make AI Peekaboo the right AI visibility platform for SEO and marketing agencies that need to start this week without a procurement cycle.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
RadarkitRanksmithRadarkitRanksmithRanksmithRadarkitRadarkit and Ranksmith are both self-serve AI visibility tools, but they prioritise differently. Radarkit wins on API access at the entry tier and lowest price; Ranksmith wins on citation attribution, free trial evaluation, and Grok and Claude coverage at the top tier. The trade-off is API access today versus citation attribution and broader engine coverage.
Bottom line
Radarkit answers how a developer or analyst can pull AI visibility data into a custom reporting stack at $29/month with API access on every paid tier. Ranksmith answers how a marketing team can evaluate AI visibility with a free trial, scale to citation attribution workflows, and access Grok and Claude on Enterprise tier. If API access at the cheapest price is the deciding factor, Radarkit. If citation attribution and a free trial are the deciding factors, Ranksmith.
Frequently asked questions
How does Radarkit compare to Ranksmith on API access?
Radarkit includes API access on every paid tier from $29/month. Ranksmith does not currently advertise API access on any tier. For teams that need programmatic data delivery on a budget plan, Radarkit is the practical answer in this AI visibility tool comparison.
Which tool is best for evaluation, Radarkit or Ranksmith?
Ranksmith offers a free trial on every tier with no credit card required, plus a standalone Free AI Checker utility for one-off queries. Radarkit does not currently offer a free tier or trial. For teams that prefer to test before subscribing, Ranksmith is the lower-friction option.
Which is best for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows, Radarkit or Ranksmith?
For GEO workflows that need API access on the cheapest plan, Radarkit is the right choice. For GEO workflows that need citation attribution, PR acquisition hooks, and Grok or Claude coverage on Enterprise tier, Ranksmith is the right choice. Neither tool offers API access on standard plans for Ranksmith, while Radarkit ships it on every plan.
How much does Radarkit cost compared to Ranksmith?
Radarkit Lite is $29/month with API access; Growth is $79/month adding competitor benchmarking and citation source analysis; Pro is $139/month with unlimited historical data; Enterprise is contact-based. Ranksmith Starter is $69/month with a free trial and ChatGPT and Perplexity coverage; Pro is $149/month adding Gemini; Enterprise is $549/month unlocking Grok and Claude. Radarkit is cheaper at entry; Ranksmith offers a free trial.
Which tool tracks Grok and Claude, Radarkit or Ranksmith?
Ranksmith tracks Grok and Claude on Enterprise tier ($549/month). Radarkit tracks Claude on every tier but does not track Grok. For teams that need Grok specifically, Ranksmith Enterprise is the option in this comparison.
Can I use Radarkit or Ranksmith for agency client reporting?
Neither tool is designed for agency multi-client workflows. Neither offers white-label delivery or guest client access on any tier. For agencies delivering AI visibility reports to clients, look at platforms built around agency workflows.