Comparison

Adbeat vs Birch in 2026: Display intelligence vs paid-media automation

Adbeat helps a media buyer study competitors across 1000+ display and native networks. Birch, formerly Revealbot, connects to active accounts so a team can automate rules, launch creative, analyse performance, and report across paid channels.

Updated October 21, 2026
Adbeat
Birch (formerly Revealbot)
Key takeaways
  • Adbeat researches competitor display and native activity across 1000+ ad networks and 140+ countries. Birch operates connected paid-media accounts across Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat.
  • Birch Rules supports nested conditions, custom timeframes, ranking conditions, and more than 20 actions. Adbeat does not change campaigns or automate budgets.
  • Adbeat starts with a limited free tier and has a $99/month Intro plan. Birch Essential is $99/month billed monthly or $49/month billed annually at up to $10K in connected monthly ad spend.
  • Adbeat provides publisher intelligence and historical creative research. Birch Explorer analyses performance from accounts that the team connects.
  • Birch Stage can build Meta, TikTok, or Snapchat ads from Google Drive media and Google Sheets rows, with up to 1,000 rows in a run. Adbeat has no campaign-launch workflow.
  • Adbeat offers white-label reports on Professional and Enterprise. Birch publishes white-label reports alongside scheduled reporting and alerts.
  • Neither product replaces the other for a serious agency: one supplies market evidence, the other supplies campaign controls and account reporting.

Adbeat and Birch sit on opposite sides of the paid-media desk. Adbeat is for learning from the market before you spend: it indexes competitor display and native creative, landing pages, publishers, and modeled spend across more than 1000 networks in over 140 countries. Birch is for changing the campaigns you already run. Its Rules, Explorer, Stage, reports, and Meta server-side tracking work with connected accounts across Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat. That distinction matters more than either headline price. An agency doing a competitive audit can get useful direction from Adbeat without account access. A performance team trying to pause weak ads, scale budgets, or launch a large creative test needs Birch, but should treat automation as an operating process with review controls. Choose the research system for a competitive question, and the operating system for an execution problem.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
Adbeat$0/monthMedia buyers and agencies that need evidence about competitor display and native strategy before choosing publishers, offers, or creative tests.
Birch (formerly Revealbot)$99/mo monthly or $49/mo annually at up to $10K connected spendIn-house performance teams and paid-media agencies with active multi-channel accounts, clear approval controls, and a recurring need to automate campaign operations.

Adbeat

Display and native competitor intelligence for creative, landing pages, publishers, and modeled spend

Full review →
Adbeat screenshot

Adbeat is a specialist research product for display and native advertising. It monitors competitor activity across more than 1000 ad networks in over 140 countries, then makes creative, landing pages, publisher placements, and estimated spend available for investigation. A buyer entering a new vertical can use it to map the publishers and offers competitors keep returning to instead of relying on a handful of ads encountered in a browser.

Its creative library is especially useful when the question is not simply what an advertiser ran today, but what they kept testing over time. The paid plans extend history from 90 days on Intro to 365 days on Professional and full history on Enterprise. Publisher intelligence adds another layer by showing where a competitor is placing ads and how modeled spend is distributed. Those are directional signals for prioritising tests, not a substitute for the advertiser’s actual conversion data.

The boundary is clear. Adbeat does not manage campaigns, cover search or social ads, or connect to your ad account to calculate live performance. Professional at $399 per month is the practical tier for full country coverage, white-label reports, and API access, so it earns its place only where display intelligence is an ongoing buying decision rather than a one-off curiosity.

Pricing
Feature
Free
$0/month
Intro
$99/month
Professional
$399/month
Enterprise
Custom quote
Ad networks coveredVery limited1000+1000+1000+
Countries covered1-210+140+140+
Creative library history30 days90 days365 daysFull history
Publisher intelligenceNoYesYesYes
White-label reportsNoNoYesYes
API accessNoNoYesYes
Best for: Media buyers and agencies that need evidence about competitor display and native strategy before choosing publishers, offers, or creative tests.

Birch (formerly Revealbot)

Paid-media automation, creative launch, analysis, reporting, and Meta server-side tracking for active accounts

Full review →
Birch (formerly Revealbot) screenshot

Birch, formerly Revealbot, is an operating layer for teams already running paid accounts. Rules works across Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat, letting a team combine nested conditions, metric comparisons, custom timeframes, ranking conditions, and more than 20 actions. Checks can run as often as every 15 minutes. That is useful for guarded budget changes, performance alerts, and repeatable operating rules, but it requires an owner who can define and review the logic.

The product expands beyond automation. Explorer is a visual workspace for trends, comparisons, creative groupings, fatigued ads, and best performers. Stage uses view-only Google Drive folders and Google Sheets to assemble Meta, TikTok, or Snapchat ads, with each row supplying fields such as copy, CTA, URL, UTM parameters, and ad name. A user previews the output before choosing active, paused, or scheduled launch status, which keeps a changed sheet from becoming an automatic live campaign.

Pricing is based on connected monthly ad spend, not a flat seat-only model. Essential includes core workspace and reporting access, while Pro is where Rules, Explorer, Launcher, custom metrics, and broader integrations appear. Birch also has a separate Meta-focused server-side tracking product, Hub, which is free for 10,000 events per month before event-volume pricing applies. It is a better answer to an execution bottleneck than to a competitive-research question.

Pricing
Feature
Essential
$99/mo monthly or $49/mo annually at up to $10K connected spend
Pro
$99/mo monthly at up to $10K connected spend
Enterprise
Custom plan
Hub gateway
Free for 10,000 events/mo, then $10 to $499/mo
Rules and strategiesNoYesYesNo
Explorer and custom metricsNoYesYesNo
StageFree versionFree versionCustom limitNo
Scheduled reports and activity pageYesYesYesNo
Free trial14 days, no card14 days, no cardContact salesNo
Best for: In-house performance teams and paid-media agencies with active multi-channel accounts, clear approval controls, and a recurring need to automate campaign operations.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
Adbeat
Birch (formerly Revealbot)
Primary jobCompetitive display and native researchPaid-media operations on connected accounts
Channels covered1000+ display and native networksMeta, Google, TikTok, Snapchat
Competitor creative researchYesNo
Publisher intelligenceYesNo
Campaign automationNoYes, Pro and Enterprise
Bulk creative launchNoYes, via Stage
Account performance analysisNoYes, via Explorer
White-label reportingYes, Professional and EnterpriseYes
API or programmatic accessYes, Professional and EnterpriseBirch MCP and integrations
Starting price$0/mo, Intro $99/mo$49/mo annual Essential at up to $10K spend

Which should you choose?

Media buyers researching competitor display and native strategyAdbeat
Teams automating budget, performance, and creative actions in live accountsBirch (formerly Revealbot)
Agencies preparing a competitor-ad audit without account accessAdbeat
Teams launching high-volume Meta, TikTok, or Snapchat creative testsBirch (formerly Revealbot)
Buyers needing publisher-level competitor placement intelligenceAdbeat
Operators needing rule logs, alerts, and account-level performance analysisBirch (formerly Revealbot)

Adbeat and Birch are complementary because they address different moments in a paid-media workflow. Adbeat supplies external evidence: which publishers, creatives, landing pages, and display patterns competitors are using. Birch supplies controlled account action: rules, analysis, creative assembly, reports, and related tracking once a team has decided what to test. Do not buy Birch expecting a competitor archive, and do not buy Adbeat expecting it to keep campaigns inside guardrails. The better choice follows the job currently slowing the team down.

Bottom line

Choose Adbeat when the next decision is where to place display or native budget, which competitor offer deserves a test, or how to turn a market audit into a client deliverable. Choose Birch when the bottleneck is operating connected Meta, Google, TikTok, or Snapchat accounts with repeatable rules, analysis, and creative launches. A mature agency can justify both, but a small team should buy the one that fixes its immediate workflow rather than treating two very different products as interchangeable.

Frequently asked questions

Is Adbeat or Birch better for finding competitors’ display advertising publishers in 2026?

Adbeat is the better choice for competitor display publisher research because it records publisher placements, creative, landing pages, and modeled spend across its display and native network coverage. Birch works inside connected ad accounts and analyses their performance, so it does not offer an external archive of where an unrelated competitor is buying inventory.

Can Birch automate Meta campaign budgets while Adbeat monitors competitors?

Birch can automate actions in connected paid-media accounts through Rules, including logic based on nested conditions, metric comparisons, ranking conditions, and custom timeframes. Adbeat can inform the research behind a test but cannot connect to an account, change a campaign budget, pause an ad, or automate an operational response.

Which is better for an agency’s client-ready paid media report, Adbeat or Birch?

Adbeat is stronger for a client report focused on competitor display and native activity because its Professional and Enterprise plans include white-label reporting and its data is external market evidence. Birch is stronger for reporting on the client’s own connected accounts, scheduled performance review, and automation activity rather than competitor publisher intelligence.

Does Birch replace an ad spy tool for Meta and TikTok creative research?

Birch does not replace an ad spy tool because its Stage and Explorer features work with the media and performance data in accounts a team connects. Birch can help create and analyse a team’s own Meta, TikTok, or Snapchat ads, but it does not claim to maintain a public competitor-creative archive comparable to Adbeat’s display and native library.

What should a small paid-media team buy first, Adbeat or Birch?

A small paid-media team should choose Adbeat first when it lacks evidence about competitor display and native activity, and choose Birch first when daily campaign operations are already consuming too much manual work. Birch pricing follows connected ad spend and its useful automation is on Pro, so test the 14-day trial against a tightly defined operational problem before committing.

Photo of Filipe Lins DuarteReviewed by Filipe Lins DuarteCo-Founder & CEO

Vast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.

Photo of John RiceChecked by John RiceCo-Founder & CTO

15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.

Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.

Found this useful? Share it: