Birch (formerly Revealbot) vs SpyFu in 2026: Account automation vs competitor research
Birch changes work inside connected ad accounts across Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat. SpyFu investigates a competitor’s SEO and PPC history. Choose Birch to run a paid-media operation, and SpyFu to understand the market before you change one.
Birch (formerly Revealbot)
SpyFu- Birch works on connected advertising accounts and automates campaign-management decisions across Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat; SpyFu researches competitors’ PPC and SEO activity instead of operating accounts.
- Birch Pro starts at $99 per month at up to $10,000 in connected monthly ad spend, while SpyFu Basic is $39 per month and Pro + AI is $119 per month.
- SpyFu’s historical PPC research, keyword-gap analysis, backlink analysis, and 15-minute rank updates are not Birch features.
- Birch Rules supports nested conditions, custom metrics, attribution inputs, more than 20 actions, and checks as often as every 15 minutes; SpyFu does not change campaign settings.
- Both can support agency reporting: Birch publishes white-label reports, while SpyFu offers custom branded reports from Pro + AI.
- Birch has a 14-day trial with no card required for Essential and Pro at the published entry-spend setting; SpyFu’s reviewed profile does not establish a trial offer.
Birch and SpyFu sit on opposite sides of paid-media work, so the useful question is not which one has more features. Birch is an operating layer for accounts you already control: its Rules product can act on performance data across Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat, while Stage turns Google Drive media and Google Sheets plans into launch batches for Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat. SpyFu looks outward instead. It assembles a competitor’s historical PPC ads, keywords, estimated spend, organic rankings, backlinks, and rank-tracking data, then offers branded reports from Pro + AI. A media buyer deciding whether to pause an underperforming campaign needs Birch. A strategist preparing a paid-search brief or finding the keywords a rival has kept buying needs SpyFu. They can work in sequence, but neither is a substitute for the other.
The tools at a glance
Birch (formerly Revealbot)
Paid-media automation, creative launch, analysis, and reporting for active ad accounts
Birch is built for work after the media plan is approved. Rules can combine platform data, calculated metrics, Google Sheets, Google Analytics, and connected attribution sources, then take one of more than 20 actions across Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat. Nested conditions, ranking logic, and custom timeframes make it more useful than a native-platform rule for teams with a defined operating process. Rules can check every 15 minutes, but the platform still expects someone to decide what deserves an automatic action.
Its other products reinforce that operating role. Explorer compares performance and groups creative; reports can combine platforms and run on a schedule; automation logs show what was evaluated or changed. Stage turns view-only Drive folders and Google Sheets rows into Meta, TikTok, or Snapchat ads, with a preview before launch and up to 1,000 rows in a run. That is a practical creative-operations workflow, not competitor intelligence.
The boundary matters when evaluating Birch against SpyFu. Birch can help a team act after it has formed a hypothesis, such as protecting a budget or launching a fresh creative batch. It does not claim to be a searchable archive of another domain’s keyword strategy, ad history, or backlinks. Essential is deliberately narrow, excluding Rules, Explorer, Launcher, custom metrics, and expanded integrations. For most active teams, Pro is the meaningful Birch evaluation tier.
| Feature | Essential $99/mo monthly or $49/mo annual at up to $10K connected monthly ad spend | Pro $99/mo at up to $10K connected monthly ad spend | Enterprise Custom plan | Hub gateway Free for 10,000 events/mo, then $10 to $499/mo by event volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing basis | Connected monthly ad spend | Connected monthly ad spend | Custom | Tracked events per gateway |
| Rules and strategies | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Explorer, Launcher, and custom metrics | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Stage bulk creative launch | Free version | Free version | Custom limit | No |
| Trial | 14 days, no card required | 14 days, no card required | Contact sales | No |
SpyFu
Competitive intelligence for SEO and PPC with historical ad data and fast rank updates
SpyFu begins before campaign execution. Its core job is to show what a competing domain has done in paid search and organic search: ads it has run, keywords it targeted, estimated spend, ranking history, and the gaps between its keyword footprint and yours. The historical PPC database is especially useful when a team is entering a market and wants to inspect patterns that lasted longer than a single current campaign.
It also handles adjacent research work that Birch does not cover. Keyword-gap analysis identifies organic opportunities, the backlink module exposes incoming-link patterns, and rank tracking can update as often as every 15 minutes on Pro + AI and Team/Agency. Custom branded reports are available from Pro + AI, which makes the product workable for consultants turning initial research into a client deliverable.
SpyFu is not an account-management system. It does not publish rules for changing bids, budgets, or ads in a connected platform, and it has no Stage-style workflow for creating paid-social ads from a sheet. Its Basic tier is a low-cost research entry point, but API access, branded reports, fast rank updates, and AI-powered recommendations begin on Pro + AI. Choose it for competitive investigation, not for daily campaign control.
| Feature | Basic $39/month | Pro + AI $119/month | Team/Agency $249/month |
|---|---|---|---|
| API access | No | Yes | Yes |
| White-label reports | No | Yes | Yes |
| Rank tracking updates | Weekly | 15 min | 15 min |
| Users | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| AI-powered recommendations | No | Yes | Yes |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Birch (formerly Revealbot) | SpyFu |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Operate active paid-media accounts | Research competitors’ SEO and PPC activity |
| Connected-account actions | Yes, Rules across Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snapchat | No |
| Competitor PPC ad history | Not published as a competitor archive | Yes, historical PPC research |
| SEO keyword-gap research | No | Yes |
| Rank tracking | No | Yes, 15 min on Pro + AI and Team/Agency |
| Creative launch from Drive and Sheets | Yes, Stage for Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat | No |
| White-label reporting | Yes | Yes, from Pro + AI |
| API access | Birch MCP for compatible AI clients | Yes, from Pro + AI |
| Starting price | $99/mo at published up-to-$10K connected-spend setting | $39/mo |
Which should you choose?
Birch (formerly Revealbot)SpyFuBirch (formerly Revealbot)SpyFuSpyFuBirch (formerly Revealbot)Do not buy Birch expecting a competitor-ad database, and do not buy SpyFu expecting an automation console. Birch earns its place once a team has live accounts, repeatable thresholds, and an owner for reviewing rules. SpyFu earns its place when the next decision depends on market evidence: which search terms competitors bought, which ads persisted, or where their organic footprint leaves an opening. The products can form a sensible research-to-execution workflow, but they are not competing for the same daily task.
Bottom line
Pick Birch when the bottleneck is repetitive campaign operation across Meta, Google, TikTok, or Snapchat. Pro is the relevant plan for Rules, Explorer, custom metrics, and broader integrations, and its connected-spend pricing should be modeled across the account portfolio before rollout. Pick SpyFu when the bottleneck is competitive search research. At $39 per month it is the cheaper starting point, while $119 per month adds API access, branded reports, and 15-minute rank updates. Research with SpyFu, then use Birch only if there is a controlled workflow worth automating.
Frequently asked questions
Should a paid-search agency choose Birch or SpyFu for competitor research before launching Google Ads?
SpyFu is the better choice for competitor research before a Google Ads launch because it provides historical PPC ads, targeted keywords, estimated spend, keyword gaps, and rank history. Birch helps operate connected accounts after the campaign plan exists, but it does not present itself as a searchable archive of a competitor’s search activity.
Can Birch replace SpyFu for finding competitor PPC keywords and backlinks?
Birch cannot replace SpyFu for competitor PPC keywords and backlinks because Birch is an account automation and creative-launch product, while SpyFu publishes dedicated PPC research, keyword-gap analysis, and backlink analysis. Birch can automate actions from your own account data; it does not expose the competitive-search research workflow SpyFu provides.
Which tool is better for automating Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat campaign rules in 2026?
Birch is the relevant tool for automating Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat campaign rules because its Rules product supports those networks alongside Google, with nested conditions, custom metrics, attribution inputs, and more than 20 actions. SpyFu does not claim to edit campaign settings or provide cross-network automation rules.
Does SpyFu or Birch offer white-label reports for agency clients?
Both Birch and SpyFu publish white-label reporting options, but for different deliverables. Birch supports reports around account operations and performance workflows, while SpyFu offers custom branded reports from Pro + AI for keyword, ranking, and competitor research. The better fit depends on whether the client needs execution reporting or market intelligence.
How should an agency combine SpyFu and Birch without duplicating tools?
An agency can use SpyFu first to research competitor keywords, historical PPC patterns, and organic gaps, then use Birch to implement governed rules and creative-launch workflows in accounts it manages. That division avoids asking Birch to be a research archive or asking SpyFu to control live campaign budgets and ads.
Reviewed by Filipe Lins DuarteCo-Founder & CEOVast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.
Checked by John RiceCo-Founder & CTO15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.
Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.