Goodie vs Riff Analytics in 2026: Closed-Loop AEO vs $49/mo 7-Engine Monitor
Twelve-model closed-loop AEO from $399/month, or seven-engine brand mention tracking with citation source analysis from $49/month.
Goodie
Riff Analytics- Goodie tracks up to twelve AI models on Enterprise. Riff Analytics tracks 7 AI engines on every plan: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama.
- Goodie Explorer starts at $399/month for three engines, with Pro and Enterprise requiring a demo call. Riff Analytics Starter is $49/month and Pro is $199/month.
- Riff Analytics includes an AI readiness audit that checks whether site structure, content, and entity signals are set up for AI discovery. Goodie approaches the same problem through its Agent Experience Suite on higher tiers.
- Goodie ships AEO Content Studio, Optimization Actions, Agent Experience Suite, agentic commerce tracking, and revenue attribution. Riff Analytics is monitoring-focused with citation source tracking and competitor benchmarking.
- Riff Analytics does not offer API access on any plan. Goodie ships an MCP server on every plan but locks REST API access to Enterprise.
- How does Goodie compare to Riff Analytics on revenue attribution? Goodie ties AI citations to Google Analytics conversions; Riff Analytics is monitoring-focused without revenue proof.
Choosing between Goodie and Riff Analytics is really a question about execution scope and budget. Goodie is a closed-loop AEO platform with twelve-model monitoring, optimization actions, agentic commerce visibility, crawler log analysis, AEO content generation, and revenue attribution tied to Google Analytics. Riff Analytics is a self-serve AI brand monitoring tool at $49/month covering seven AI models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama) with citation source tracking and an AI readiness audit. Both platforms serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows, but the depth versus accessibility tradeoff is significant. The right pick depends on whether your programme needs enterprise sales-led procurement with full execution layers and revenue attribution, or affordable monitoring with citation source analysis across a broad range of AI models.
The tools at a glance
Goodie
End-to-end AEO platform covering 12 AI models with agentic commerce and revenue attribution
Goodie is the most complete AEO platform available, covering the full workflow: prompt research, monitoring across twelve AI models, a prioritized optimization actions playbook, agentic commerce visibility, crawler behavior analysis, AEO content generation, and revenue attribution connected to Google Analytics. The Explorer tier starts at $399/month for three engines and 100 prompts, with Pro and Enterprise requiring a demo call. Full twelve-model coverage is available only on Enterprise.
The closed-loop system is the platform's core differentiator. Beyond visibility data, Goodie delivers a prioritized list of optimization actions across owned and earned assets, an Agent Experience Suite that shows how AI crawlers actually traverse your site, an Agentic Commerce Suite for AI shopping surfaces, and a Content Studio that generates AEO-optimized content. For enterprise brands treating AI search as a serious channel with budget to prove ROI, this is the deepest tool in the category.
The accessibility trade-off is real. The Explorer tier is $399/month for just three engines, the Pro and Enterprise tiers require a sales conversation, the API is locked to Enterprise, and multi-brand tracking is Enterprise-only. Goodie also ships an MCP server on all plans including Explorer, which is useful for developer-led teams who want to pull visibility data into AI coding environments. For smaller budgets or solo consultants, the price curve cuts you off early.
| Feature | Explorer $399/mo | Pro Contact sales | Enterprise Contact sales |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | 3 | 6 | Up to 12 |
| Prompts per month | 100 | 250 | 500+ |
| Optimization actions/mo | 10 | 30 | 60+ |
| MCP server access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agentic commerce visibility | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agent Experience Suite (crawler logs) | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AEO Content Studio | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Revenue attribution | GA integration | Full | Custom |
| API and data export | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-brand tracking | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Riff Analytics
AI brand visibility tracking across 7 LLM engines with citation source analysis, sentiment monitoring, and competitor benchmarking
Riff Analytics tracks brand mentions across a wider set of AI engines than most competitors, including Grok and DeepSeek on top of the main five. The monitoring and citation analysis features are solid. The absence of an API and white-label delivery makes it a poor fit for agencies, but in-house teams who simply need to know where their brand shows up in AI answers will find it functional at $49/month.
The platform monitors not just whether your brand appears in AI answers, but which sources those AI engines are citing when they mention you. This citation source tracking tells you whether AI engines are pulling from your own content, third-party reviews, press coverage, or competitor domains, which informs where to invest in content and PR to improve AI visibility over time.
Riff Analytics is positioned as a self-serve in-house tool. There is no API, no white-label delivery, and no client portal, so it is not designed for agencies managing multiple brands. The $49/month Starter plan is accessible for small teams, though the jump to $199/month Pro is steep for what is publicly documented as the next tier.
| Feature | Starter $49/mo | Pro $199/mo |
|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 7 | 7 |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI readiness audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Looker Studio connector | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Goodie | Riff Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | Up to 12: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, Copilot, Meta AI, Grok, AI Overviews, AI Mode, DeepSeek, Amazon Rufus, Sparky | 7: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Yes (Optimization Actions) | No |
| Category intelligence | Yes (Prompt Research) | No |
| AEO content generation | Yes (Content Studio) | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | Yes (Agent Experience Suite) | No |
| Page content audits | Yes | Yes (AI readiness audit) |
| API access | Enterprise only | No |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No (MCP server all plans) | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | Enterprise only | No |
| Starting price | $399/mo | $49/mo |
Need white-label AI visibility reports alongside Goodie and Riff Analytics?
Neither Goodie nor Riff Analytics includes white-label delivery on standard tiers. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool for agencies that need white-label client reports, with guest access links included on every plan from $50/month. For SEO and marketing agencies delivering branded reports to clients, AI Peekaboo covers the gap without enterprise contracts.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
GoodieRiff AnalyticsGoodieRiff AnalyticsGoodieGoodieRiff AnalyticsThe cleanest way to think about these two tools is by their commercial models and execution depth. Goodie optimizes for depth on a sales-led enterprise tier with full revenue attribution, agentic commerce, and twelve-model coverage. Riff Analytics optimizes for accessibility at $49/month with seven-model coverage, citation source tracking, and an AI readiness audit. Both serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows, but the audience and execution scope are very different. Choosing between them is mostly a question of whether you want enterprise AEO execution under one roof or affordable monitoring with citation analysis.
Bottom line
If you are an enterprise brand with a meaningful AEO budget who needs the widest model coverage, agentic commerce visibility, AEO content generation, crawler logs, and revenue attribution proof, Goodie is the most defensible choice in the category. If you are an in-house team that wants affordable monitoring across seven AI engines with citation source analysis and an AI readiness audit from $49/month, Riff Analytics delivers strong value. The defining question is whether you need enterprise AEO execution or affordable monitoring with citation analysis.
Frequently asked questions
How does Goodie compare to Riff Analytics on AI visibility tool comparison depth?
Goodie has the deeper feature set: twelve-model coverage, AEO content generation, Optimization Actions, Agent Experience Suite, agentic commerce tracking, and Google Analytics revenue attribution. Riff Analytics focuses on monitoring across seven AI engines with citation source tracking, an AI readiness audit, and competitor benchmarking. For full-stack Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) execution, Goodie is the more complete answer. For affordable monitoring with citation analysis on a budget, Riff Analytics is the more practical option.
How much does Goodie cost compared to Riff Analytics?
Goodie Explorer starts at $399/month for three engines and 100 prompts. Pro and Enterprise pricing requires a demo call. Riff Analytics Starter is $49/month for seven engines, and Pro is $199/month with the same model coverage. At the entry tier, Goodie costs roughly eight times more than Riff Analytics per month for less coverage.
Which tool has better citation source analysis?
Riff Analytics ships dedicated citation source tracking on every plan, identifying which URLs and domains AI engines cite when they mention your brand. Goodie surfaces citations through its core monitoring but does not break out citation source analysis as a dedicated module. For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) teams that want to understand which content types and domains drive AI citations, Riff Analytics is the more focused option.
Does Riff Analytics offer API access?
No. Riff Analytics does not offer API access on any plan. Data cannot be exported to external tools programmatically. Goodie ships an MCP server on every plan but locks REST API access to Enterprise. For teams that prioritize programmatic data access, AI Peekaboo ($50/month) and LLMrefs (€79/month) are the more accessible options.
Is Riff Analytics suitable for agencies?
No. Riff Analytics does not offer white-label delivery, guest access links, or a client portal. It is designed for in-house use only. Goodie restricts multi-brand tracking to Enterprise. For agencies that need client-facing branded dashboards on a budget, AI Peekaboo includes white-label delivery from $50/month.
Which tool is better for tracking Grok and DeepSeek?
Riff Analytics tracks both Grok and DeepSeek alongside the main five AI models on every plan starting at $49/month. Goodie tracks Grok and DeepSeek on Enterprise tier behind a sales call. For in-house teams that want to track Grok and DeepSeek on a self-serve budget, Riff Analytics is the more accessible option.