Comparison

Maeve Social vs Reeling in 2026: approval-led social operations vs video-first multi-destination publishing

Maeve Social gives agencies a nine-platform calendar, rules-based client approvals, and public plans from $25 a month. Reeling starts at $2.99 a month, centres video publishing across 15 listed destinations, and opens REST API and MCP access on Creator.

Updated October 21, 2026
Maeve Social
Reeling
Key takeaways
  • Maeve Social Standard includes client review links, internal approvals, shareable calendars, and aggregate analytics for $99 per month or $950 per year.
  • Reeling Creator costs $5.99 per month and includes three projects, up to 10 connected channels, unlimited scheduling, 500 AI credits, and REST API plus MCP access.
  • Maeve routes approvals by attributes including channel, platform, post type, author, label, pillar, format, and campaign.
  • Reeling lists 15 destinations, including YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Bluesky, Reddit, Medium, Quora, Telegram, Discord, and Mastodon.
  • Reeling Agency adds unlimited projects and brands, approvals, webhooks, and priority support for $19.99 per month.
  • Reeling documents that TikTok may need a final in-app action and that some destinations have account, approval, or Companion browser requirements.
  • Maeve lists REST API, CLI, and MCP access on all paid plans, but its reviewed profile does not establish Reeling’s 15-destination video delivery matrix.

Maeve Social and Reeling overlap on calendars and scheduled publishing, but they solve different operational failures. Maeve is the better answer when a team loses time to ambiguous feedback and late client changes. Standard costs $99 per month or $950 per year and supports routing rules, internal approvals, client browser links, shareable calendars, and aggregate analytics. Reeling is the more attractive engine for a video-heavy distribution plan: Creator costs $5.99 per month for three projects, up to 10 channels, unlimited scheduled posts, 500 AI credits, a social inbox, and API plus MCP access. Its listed network breadth is compelling, but the delivery path varies by destination. Choose Maeve when sign-off is the bottleneck. Choose Reeling when video adaptation, lower-cost channel reach, and programmable publishing matter more than a formal client review chain.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
Maeve Social$25/mo or $240/yearAgencies and brand teams that need every campaign to move through structured internal and client approval before publishing.
Reeling$2.99/month or $29/yearVideo-led creators and technical marketing teams that need broad destination coverage, a project boundary, and a documented API or MCP publishing path.

Maeve Social

Nine-platform social project management with client approval links, audit-friendly review stages, and calendar planning

Full review →
Maeve Social screenshot

Maeve Social treats a social calendar as a managed delivery process. It combines publishing to nine platforms with a calendar, grid planner, inbox, analytics reports, and branded reporting, but its distinguishing capability is approval routing. A rule can match channel, platform, post type, author, label, pillar, format, or campaign. Stages can require any reviewer, every reviewer, or an ordered set of reviewers. That gives a social lead a named decision point instead of a scattered collection of informal comments.

The practical plan for an agency is Standard at $99 per month or $950 per year. It includes internal collaboration approvals, client review links, shareable calendar links, and all-channel aggregate analytics. Clients can approve, comment, or request changes through a browser without an account, and the product documents version differences, stage reminders, closing times, manager override, and failed-post recovery. Basic is $25 per month or $240 per year, but does not include the client and internal approval surfaces. Premium is $199 per month or $1,900 per year and raises the monthly AI-credit allocation to 3,000.

Maeve is also not closed to technical teams. All plans list REST API, CLI, and MCP access, and its built-in assistant has declared monthly allowances rather than an unlimited claim. It is a strong choice when consistent governance across campaigns matters more than squeezing distribution into the lowest subscription. Its profile does not establish Reeling’s video-specific composer controls, 15 listed destinations, or per-network delivery status. A team with a heavily video-led calendar should compare the actual network paths before assuming Maeve covers the same ground.

Pricing
Feature
Basic
$25/mo or $240/year
Standard
$99/mo or $950/year
Premium
$199/mo or $1,900/year
Publish to nine platforms✓✓✓
Calendar and grid planner✓✓✓
Internal and client approvals✗✓✓
Shareable calendar links✗✓✓
Aggregate analytics✗✓✓
AI credits/month8001,5003,000
REST API, CLI, and MCP✓✓✓
Trial3 days3 days3 days
Best for: Agencies and brand teams that need every campaign to move through structured internal and client approval before publishing.

Reeling

Video-first publishing across 15 listed destinations with project controls, REST API, and official MCP access

Full review →
Reeling screenshot

Reeling is designed around video publication and projects. A project separates a brand’s connected channels, calendar, media, and controls, while the Composer adapts a post for each destination. Its published list includes YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, Threads, Pinterest, Bluesky, X, Telegram, Discord, Mastodon, Reddit, Medium, and Quora. Destination-specific settings cover items such as YouTube visibility and audience flags, TikTok Duet, Stitch, and AIGC settings, Instagram feed sharing, Bluesky reply controls, and Pinterest boards.

Creator is the value tier at $5.99 per month or $64 per year. It provides three projects, up to 10 connected channels, unlimited scheduled posts, 500 AI credits, a social inbox and direct replies, real-time metrics, and REST API with an official MCP server. Agency is $19.99 per month or $215 per year, with unlimited projects, channels, and scheduled posts, 2,000 AI credits, collaboration and client approvals, webhooks, and priority support. The API can accept a public video URL or upload, publish or schedule it, and return a post ID so a workflow can check status later.

The honest trade-off is delivery variation. A request can be accepted while the underlying post remains scheduled or incomplete. TikTok can require a final in-app step, Instagram requires the right Business or Creator account and tester access, LinkedIn company pages need API approval, and X, Reddit, Medium, and Quora can use the logged-in Companion browser session. Comment inbox and direct replies are currently documented for YouTube, Instagram, and Bluesky. Reeling is the right choice when a team can validate those network requirements and wants video reach; it is not as clearly a governed client-approval system as Maeve Standard.

Pricing
Feature
Starter
$2.99/month or $29/year
Creator
$5.99/month or $64/year
Agency
$19.99/month or $215/year
Projects13Unlimited
Connected channels3Up to 10Unlimited
Scheduled posts30/monthUnlimitedUnlimited
AI creditsCaption and Hook Generator500/month2,000/month
REST API and MCP✗✓✓
Collaboration and approvals✗✗✓
Webhooks✗✗Inbound repurposing and outbound signed events
Best for: Video-led creators and technical marketing teams that need broad destination coverage, a project boundary, and a documented API or MCP publishing path.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
Maeve Social
Reeling
Primary workflowApproval-led social operationsVideo-first multi-destination publishing
Published entry price$25/month Basic$2.99/month Starter
Publishing scopeNine supported platforms15 listed destinations
Planning surfaceCalendar and grid plannerProject calendar and per-network composer
Formal client approvalStandard and Premium, with no-account browser linksAgency only
API and MCP accessAll paid plansCreator and Agency
Video controlsNot established as a video-first matrixDestination-specific settings and AI adaptation
Inbox and repliesComments and DMs listedYouTube, Instagram, Bluesky
Delivery conditionsNot published as Reeling-style per-network rulesYes, vary by network and account setup
Best fitAgency campaign review and deliveryVideo distribution and technical automation

Which should you choose?

Agency that needs no-login client approvalMaeve Social Standard
Video creator distributing across many destinationsReeling Creator
Campaign needing rule-based sign-off before publishingMaeve Social
Technical team needing REST API and MCP from a low-cost planReeling Creator
Agency needing approvals plus webhooks for video workReeling Agency
Team needing a grid planner and aggregate analyticsMaeve Social Standard
Buyer who cannot test network-specific publishing requirementsMaeve Social is the safer operational choice

Maeve Social is better when coordination is the expensive part of publishing. Its Standard tier makes review responsibilities, client access, and calendar sharing concrete. Reeling is better when the same video must reach an unusually wide range of destinations and a developer or agent needs a documented path to publish it. The low Reeling price does not erase its network-level conditions. An agency should select Maeve for a client-facing approval system, or run a real account-level delivery test before choosing Reeling as the video distribution layer.

Bottom line

Choose Maeve Social Standard when a content operation needs reusable approval rules, version-aware review, client browser links, a shareable calendar, and aggregate analytics. Choose Reeling Creator for inexpensive video-led publishing across up to 10 channels, with three projects, unlimited scheduling, and API/MCP access. Reeling Agency makes more sense when the video workflow also needs approvals and webhooks. Neither price should be compared in isolation: Maeve buys governance, while Reeling buys channel reach that must be validated destination by destination.

Frequently asked questions

Which platform is better for an agency that needs clients to approve social videos before they publish?

Maeve Social Standard is better for client approval because it includes browser-based client review links, internal collaboration approvals, and rules that route content by campaign or other attributes. Reeling includes collaboration and client approvals only on its Agency plan, and its public emphasis is video distribution rather than a detailed review-stage model.

Can Reeling publish one video to TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn, Reddit, Medium, and Quora?

Reeling lists all of those destinations, but the delivery method and requirements differ by network. TikTok may require a final in-app action, Instagram needs the right account and tester access, LinkedIn company pages need API approval, and Reddit, Medium, and Quora can use an authenticated Companion browser session.

Is Reeling Creator cheaper than Maeve Social for a video-first creator?

Reeling Creator is cheaper for a video-first creator at $5.99 per month, with three projects, up to 10 connected channels, unlimited scheduled posts, 500 AI credits, and API/MCP access. Maeve Basic is $25 per month and is aimed at a broader calendar and planning workflow, while its approval capabilities begin on Standard.

Does Maeve Social have API or MCP access for agency automation?

Maeve Social lists REST API, CLI, and MCP access on Basic, Standard, and Premium. This makes it a published option for an agency automation workflow, while Standard and Premium retain the structured client and internal approval process that automation should not bypass.

Does a successful Reeling API request prove the video is publicly live everywhere?

No, a successful Reeling API request does not prove that a video is publicly live everywhere. Reeling distinguishes an accepted request from final delivery and documents network-specific conditions, including a finish-in-TikTok state, Instagram access requirements, and Companion browser publishing for some destinations.

Photo of Filipe Lins DuarteReviewed by Filipe Lins DuarteCo-Founder & CEO

Vast experience talking to customers and users to understand what good software looks like. Background spans commercial and product roles.

Photo of John RiceChecked by John RiceCo-Founder & CTO

15+ years building tech products and web applications. Conducted hundreds of user interviews to know what a good product looks like.

Every Marketraa page follows our editorial standards.

Found this useful? Share it: