Omnia vs Radarkit in 2026: Action plan with MCP vs 4-engine USD sub-$30 entry
Two AI visibility tools with contrasting entry points. One ships 7 engines, a weekly action plan, and an MCP server. The other covers 4 major engines at $29/month with API on every plan.
Omnia
Radarkit- Omnia covers 7 AI engines versus Radarkit's 4. Radarkit does not track Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, or Copilot. For full coverage across the major surfaces, Omnia is the stronger choice.
- Omnia ships a weekly auto-generated action plan and MCP integration with Claude or ChatGPT. Radarkit focuses on monitoring with API access and citation source identification, no action plan.
- Radarkit publishes USD pricing from $29/month with API on every paid plan. Omnia publishes EUR pricing from €79/month (about $85). For predictable USD monthly billing, Radarkit is simpler.
- Both tools offer API access. Omnia includes API on every plan from Growth (€79/month); Radarkit includes API on every paid plan including Lite ($29/month).
- Omnia caps Growth at 25 prompts; Radarkit Lite does not advertise a tight prompt cap. For wider monitoring scope, Radarkit gives more flexibility at low cost.
- Neither tool offers white-label delivery for agency client reporting. Both target single-brand in-house use cases.
If you are choosing between Omnia and Radarkit in 2026, you are choosing between an action-oriented EUR-priced platform with 7 engines and MCP integration and a USD-priced 4-engine monitoring tool with API access from $29/month. How does Omnia compare to Radarkit for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) buyers? Omnia covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Copilot, and Gemini with daily monitoring, a weekly action plan, and MCP on every plan from €79/month. Radarkit covers only ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with API access on every paid plan from $29/month in USD. The right pick depends on whether you want action automation and engine breadth in EUR, or USD-priced monitoring with API at the lowest tier.
The tools at a glance
Omnia
AI visibility monitoring with a weekly action plan that does the work for you
Omnia is an AI visibility platform built for small marketing teams that want to act on their data, not just look at it. It tracks where your brand appears in AI answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and Gemini, then produces a weekly prioritized action plan based on what it finds.
The positioning is direct: you review and approve the plan, Omnia handles the other 95%. That workflow is backed by an MCP integration that connects Omnia to Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor, so you can pull share-of-voice data, analyze citations, and generate recommendations from inside the AI assistant you already use daily.
Omnia also monitors sentiment alongside share of voice. The main trade-offs versus Radarkit are EUR pricing with currency exposure and a tighter prompt cap on Growth.
| Feature | Growth €79/mo | Pro €279/mo | Enterprise From €499/mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompts monitored | Up to 25 | Up to 100 | 200+ |
| Monitoring frequency | Daily | Daily | Daily |
| AI engines tracked | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Countries and languages | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citation monitoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Insight credits | 150 | 600 | 1,500 |
| Sentiment analysis | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data export | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Radarkit
AI brand monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with API access
Radarkit monitors brand mentions and citations across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. The platform tracks how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers, which sources the AI models cite, and how your visibility compares to competitors over time.
Where Radarkit stands out is its pricing accessibility. At $29/month for the Lite plan, it is one of the cheapest ways to get structured AI visibility data with API access included. Most tools at this price point are either read-only dashboards or restrict API use to higher tiers.
The platform is self-serve and does not require a sales call. You can sign up, connect your brand, and start seeing citation data within a day. The citation source identification feature is particularly useful: it tells you which websites and content pieces AI models are using when they mention your brand, giving you a starting point for content strategy decisions.
| Feature | Lite $29/mo | Growth $79/mo | Pro $139/mo | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citation source analysis | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Historical trend data | 30 days | 90 days | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Omnia | Radarkit |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Copilot, Gemini | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes (Growth and above) |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Yes (content gap discovery) | No |
| Category intelligence | No | No |
| AEO content generation | No (weekly action plan only) | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Yes (all plans) | Yes (all paid plans) |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No (tier-based plans) | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | No (single-brand focus) | No (single-brand focus) |
| Starting price | €79/mo | $29/mo |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Omnia and Radarkit?
Neither Omnia nor Radarkit includes white-label delivery on any plan, which limits both for agencies delivering branded client reports. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool with white-label client reports and guest access links included on every plan from $50/month Starter, alongside read and write API and Looker Studio connector. For SEO and marketing agencies that need branded reports plus programmatic data access, AI Peekaboo is the self-serve alternative without a sales call.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
OmniaOmniaRadarkitRadarkitOmniaBoth tools serve single-brand in-house use cases, but they optimize for different things. Omnia wins on engine breadth (7 versus 4), action automation (weekly action plan plus MCP integration), and sentiment analysis on Pro. Radarkit wins on USD pricing, the $29/month entry point with API on every plan, and citation source identification at the URL level. If your team wants weekly action plans and broader engine coverage in EUR, Omnia is the better fit. If your team wants USD-priced monitoring with API on the cheapest tier, Radarkit is the better fit.
Bottom line
If you need an AI visibility platform with 7 engines, a weekly action plan, and MCP integration with Claude or ChatGPT, Omnia is the answer. If you need USD pricing with API access from $29/month across 4 major engines, Radarkit is the answer. Both are strong; the right choice depends on whether you prioritize action automation with broader engine coverage in EUR, or USD-priced monitoring with API on the cheapest tier.
Frequently asked questions
How does Omnia compare to Radarkit for an AI visibility tool comparison?
Both tools serve single-brand in-house use cases but optimize for different things. Omnia covers 7 AI engines with a weekly action plan and MCP integration from €79/month in EUR. Radarkit covers 4 engines with USD pricing from $29/month, with API access on every paid plan. Choose Omnia if you want action automation and broader engine coverage. Choose Radarkit if you want USD monitoring with API on the cheapest tier.
Which AI visibility tool is best for GEO workflows with Claude or ChatGPT?
Omnia is the better fit. It ships an MCP server that connects to Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor in about a minute, so you can pull share-of-voice data, analyze citations, or generate recommendations from inside your AI assistant. Radarkit does not advertise MCP integration or weekly action automation. For teams already living inside Claude or ChatGPT, Omnia is the more direct path.
How much does Radarkit cost compared to Omnia?
Radarkit publishes USD pricing: Lite at $29/month, Growth at $79/month, Pro at $139/month, and Enterprise on contact. API is included on every paid plan. Omnia publishes EUR pricing: Growth €79/month, Pro €279/month, and Enterprise from €499/month. How much does Radarkit cost in practice depends on which tier unlocks competitor tracking; Lite is the cheapest path into API-enabled monitoring.
Is Radarkit worth the cost compared to Omnia?
It depends on what you need. Radarkit is worth the cost if you want API-enabled monitoring in USD with a low entry price across 4 engines. Omnia is worth the cost if you want 7 engines with a weekly action plan and MCP integration. If you only need monitoring for a small brand and API access matters more than engine breadth, Radarkit is the better value. If you want action automation with broader coverage, Omnia is the better choice.
Which has more AI engines, Omnia or Radarkit?
Omnia covers 7 engines on every paid plan: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Copilot, and Gemini. Radarkit tracks 4 engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. For brands that need visibility into Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, or Copilot, Omnia is the stronger choice.
Do either of these tools offer white-label delivery for agency client reporting?
No. Neither Omnia nor Radarkit offers white-label delivery or guest access for sharing branded dashboards with external clients. Both are built for single-brand in-house use. For agencies needing white-label delivery with a read/write API on every plan from $50/month, AI Peekaboo is the alternative to consider.