Radarkit vs Trakkr in 2026: $29/mo with API versus a free tier with citation sources on paid plans
Cheapest API-enabled monitoring from day one, or a functional free tier with API access on $100/month Growth?
Trakkr offers a functional free tier with no credit card required, covering the 4 core AI platforms at limited query volume. Radarkit does not currently offer a free tier or trial. For teams that prefer to evaluate before paying, Trakkr is the lower-friction choice.
Radarkit includes API access on every paid tier from $29/month. Trakkr includes API access on Growth ($100/month) and above. For teams that need API access on the cheapest plan, Radarkit is the practical answer in this AI visibility tool comparison.
Both tools track 4 AI engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. Neither tracks Google AI Overviews or Google AI Mode specifically.
Trakkr includes citation source identification on every tier including the free plan. Radarkit includes citation source analysis on Growth ($79/month) and above. Trakkr wins on citation source availability at lower tiers.
Neither tool offers crawler log access, AEO content generation, or white-label delivery. Both are monitoring and citation tracking tools without agency delivery features.
Both tools are fully self-serve with no sales call. Radarkit starts at $29/month; Trakkr offers a free tier with Growth at $100/month. The pricing structure differs but both are accessible.
For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows that need API access on the cheapest plan, Radarkit wins. For GEO workflows that need a free tier for evaluation before paying, Trakkr is the right choice.
If you are weighing Radarkit against Trakkr, you are really choosing between two accessible AI visibility tool comparison options. Radarkit starts at $29/month with API access on every paid tier and covers 4 engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity). Trakkr offers a functional free tier with no credit card required and covers the same 4 engines, with API access on Growth ($100/month) and above, plus citation source identification. The right pick depends on whether API access at the cheapest entry price or a free tier for evaluation matters more to your workflow.
The tools at a glance
Radarkit
AI brand monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with API access
Radarkit monitors brand mentions and citations across 4 AI engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. The platform tracks how often your brand appears in AI-generated answers, which sources the AI models cite, and how your visibility compares to competitors over time. The 4-platform scope is the defining feature: teams that prioritise Claude and Gemini coverage alongside the two biggest first-party AI search engines often shortlist Radarkit.
Where Radarkit stands out is on price and API access. The Lite plan at $29/month is the lowest paid entry point in the AI visibility category for a tool that includes API access across all four paid tiers. The Growth tier at $79/month unlocks competitor benchmarking and citation source analysis, and the Pro tier at $139/month adds unlimited historical data. For developers and analysts building custom reporting stacks, this combination is the deciding factor in this AI visibility tool comparison.
The gaps to plan around are scope and delivery. Radarkit does not currently track Google AI Overviews or Google AI Mode, which matters for SEO teams whose audiences are asking questions in Google search. There is no white-label delivery or branded client view on any tier, so agencies delivering AI visibility reports to clients would need a separate reporting layer. For internal Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) tracking on a tight budget, Radarkit is a credible option.
| Feature | Lite $29/mo | Growth $79/mo | Pro $139/mo | Enterprise Contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Citation source analysis | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Historical trend data | 30 days | 90 days | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| White label | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Trakkr
Free-tier AI search monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with citation source tracking
Trakkr is an AI search monitoring platform that tracks where your brand and its competitors appear in answers from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. The free entry tier lets you start monitoring without a credit card, which makes it one of the lowest-friction ways to get initial AI visibility data on any brand. The 4-platform scope is the defining feature for teams that want core coverage without paying up front.
Beyond mention tracking, Trakkr identifies the source URLs cited in AI-generated answers. This citation source view tells you which specific pages are being pulled into AI responses, both yours and competitors. This data is actionable: if a competitor blog post is cited repeatedly while your equivalent page is not, that is a direct optimization target. Most tools at this price point report brand mentions but not the source pages driving those mentions.
Paid plans start at $100 per month for the Growth tier and scale to $500 per month for the Scale tier, with Enterprise on custom pricing. API access is included on Growth and above, which makes Trakkr viable for teams that need to pull visibility data into external reporting tools, though it lacks the white-label delivery layer that agency-first platforms provide. For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) teams starting with a free tier and scaling up, Trakkr delivers solid value.
| Feature | Free Free | Growth $100/month | Scale $500/month | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Monitoring frequency | Limited | Regular | Daily | Custom |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor tracking | 1 competitor | Up to 5 | Up to 20 | Custom |
| API access | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | On request |
| Email alerts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes (Growth and up) | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | No | No |
| Category intelligence | No | No |
| AEO content generation | No | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Yes, all paid plans | Growth and above |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No | No |
| White-label delivery | No | On request (Enterprise) |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | No | No |
| Starting price | $29/mo | Free |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Radarkit and Trakkr?

Neither Radarkit nor Trakkr includes white-label delivery on any tier, which limits both for agencies delivering branded client reports. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool with white-label client reports and guest access links included on every plan from $50/month Starter, alongside read and write API. For SEO and marketing agencies managing multiple client brands, AI Peekaboo is the self-serve alternative with no per-brand markup and no sales call.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
Radarkit and Trakkr cover the same 4 engines at similar price points, but they differ on access structure. Radarkit delivers API access from the cheapest paid tier; Trakkr delivers a free tier with citation source tracking at every level but gates API access to Growth. The trade-off is API access at $29/month versus free tier evaluation and citation sources on a $100/month Growth plan.
Bottom line
Radarkit answers how a developer or analyst can pull AI visibility data into a custom reporting stack at $29/month with API access on every paid tier. Trakkr answers how a marketer can evaluate AI visibility with a free tier, scale to citation source tracking, and add API access on Growth. If API access on the cheapest plan is the deciding factor, Radarkit. If a free tier with citation sources at every level is the deciding factor, Trakkr.
Frequently asked questions
How does Radarkit compare to Trakkr on free tier availability?
Trakkr offers a functional free tier with no credit card required, covering the 4 core AI platforms at limited query volume. Radarkit does not currently offer a free tier or trial. For teams that want to evaluate before paying, Trakkr is the lower-friction choice in this AI visibility tool comparison.
Which tool has the cheapest API access, Radarkit or Trakkr?
Radarkit includes API access on every paid tier from $29/month. Trakkr includes API access on Growth ($100/month) and above. Radarkit wins on cheapest API access by a wide margin.
Which is best for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) workflows, Radarkit or Trakkr?
For GEO workflows that need API access on the cheapest plan, Radarkit is the right choice. For GEO workflows that prioritise a free tier for evaluation and citation source tracking on every plan, Trakkr is the right choice. Neither tool offers crawler log access or white-label delivery.
How much does Radarkit cost compared to Trakkr?
Radarkit Lite is $29/month with API access; Growth is $79/month adding competitor benchmarking and citation source analysis; Pro is $139/month with unlimited historical data; Enterprise is contact-based. Trakkr offers a free tier, Growth at $100/month with API access and citation source tracking, Scale at $500/month, and Enterprise on request. Radarkit is cheaper at the entry paid tier; Trakkr delivers a free evaluation tier.
Which tool tracks citation sources better, Radarkit or Trakkr?
Trakkr includes citation source identification on every tier including the free plan, with the source URLs of pages cited in AI answers. Radarkit includes citation source analysis on Growth ($79/month) and above. Trakkr wins on citation source availability at lower tiers; Radarkit wins on API access on a budget.
Can I use Radarkit or Trakkr for agency client reporting?
Neither tool is designed for agency multi-client workflows on standard plans. Radarkit does not offer white-label at any tier. Trakkr only adds white-label on Enterprise request. For agencies delivering AI visibility reports to clients, look at platforms built around agency workflows.

