Aiso vs Omnia in 2026: Conversation-led discovery vs weekly action plan with MCP integration
Two AI visibility platforms with similar pricing but very different operating philosophies. Aiso leads with conversation analysis and three-state scoring at $79/month. Omnia leads with weekly prioritized action plans and MCP integration at €79/month.
Aiso
Omnia- Aiso starts at $79/month for three-engine tracking with a Conversation Explorer. Omnia starts at €79/month (~$85) for seven engines with weekly action plans and MCP integration on Growth.
- Omnia tracks seven AI engines including Claude, Copilot, and Google AI Mode. Aiso covers three engines: ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity.
- Omnia includes an MCP server that connects the platform directly to Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor, so you can pull share-of-voice data and execute tasks from inside your AI assistant. Aiso does not expose an MCP server at any tier.
- Aiso reserves API access for Enterprise tier only. Omnia includes API access on the Growth plan at €79/month, which is rare at this price point.
- Omnia produces a weekly prioritized action plan that tells you which three things to focus on and how to execute them. Aiso focuses on prompt discovery and three-state scoring rather than weekly execution guidance.
- For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) teams in the discovery phase needing conversation-led prompt research, Aiso is the lower-friction fit at $79/month. For teams that want a weekly action plan plus MCP integration across seven engines, Omnia is the more execution-oriented choice.
If you are weighing AI visibility tools that both target small in-house teams at similar price points, Aiso and Omnia offer genuinely different value propositions. Aiso uses a Conversation Explorer to surface real ChatGPT and Gemini prompts, tracks three engines with three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring at $79/month. Omnia tracks seven engines including Claude, Copilot, and Google AI Mode, runs daily monitoring, and produces a weekly prioritized action plan that tells you what to fix, with MCP integration connecting the platform directly to Claude or ChatGPT at €79/month on Growth. How does Aiso compare to Omnia for teams weighing prompt discovery against action-plan execution? Both serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) programmes, but Aiso helps you discover prompts while Omnia helps you act on visibility data. The right pick depends on whether discovery or weekly execution is your bigger gap.
The tools at a glance
Aiso
AI search optimization using real ChatGPT and Gemini conversation analysis
Aiso is an AI search optimization platform that focuses on prompt discovery. Its Conversation Explorer analyzes real conversations happening in ChatGPT and Gemini to surface the prompts actual users are asking in your category. For teams entering Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for the first time, this removes a significant amount of upfront prompt engineering work and grounds the monitoring programme in real usage data.
The platform tracks three AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity) and uses a three-state scoring model: Mentioned, Recommended, or Absent. This scoring is more informative than a binary cited or not cited metric, since being mentioned in a long list of alternatives and being actively recommended as a solution represent meaningfully different brand outcomes. Aiso also tracks fan-out patterns: the secondary prompts users ask after an initial query.
The trade-off versus Omnia is engine count and execution layer. Aiso covers three engines versus Omnia seven, has no API access on Starter or Growth, and offers no weekly action plan or MCP integration. For teams that need conversation-led prompt discovery first, Aiso is the right starting point at $79/month.
| Feature | Starter $79/month | Growth $239/month | Enterprise Custom pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Conversation Explorer | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fan-out tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Omnia
AI visibility monitoring with a weekly action plan that does the work for you
Omnia is an AI visibility platform built for small marketing teams that want to act on their data, not just look at it. It tracks where your brand appears in AI answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, and Gemini, then produces a weekly prioritized action plan based on what it finds.
The positioning is direct: you review and approve the plan, Omnia handles the other 95%. That workflow is backed by an MCP integration that connects Omnia to Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor, so you can pull share-of-voice data, analyze citations, and generate recommendations from inside the AI assistant you already use daily.
The trade-off versus Aiso is the prompt discovery layer. Omnia assumes you already know which prompts to monitor; it does not analyze real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations to surface prompts the way Aiso's Conversation Explorer does. For teams that want a weekly execution layer plus MCP integration across seven engines, Omnia is the more action-oriented choice. For pure discovery, Aiso at $79/month is the lower-friction fit.
| Feature | Growth €79/mo | Pro €279/mo | Enterprise From €499/mo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prompts monitored | Up to 25 | Up to 100 | 200+ |
| AI engines tracked | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Countries and languages | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| MCP access | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sentiment analysis | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data export | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | 14 days | 14 days | Demo |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Aiso | Omnia |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity | 7 (ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Claude, Copilot, Gemini) |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes (Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring) | Yes |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Partial (via fan-out tracking) | Yes |
| Category intelligence | Yes (GPT Trends) | Yes (topic discovery) |
| AEO content generation | No | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Enterprise plan only | Yes (Growth+) |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No native connector | No native connector |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No (seat-based plans) | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | No | No |
| Starting price | $79/mo | €79/mo |
Need a self-serve alternative to Aiso and Omnia with white-label delivery?
Neither Aiso nor Omnia offers white-label on any tier, and both limit API access to higher plans. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool for agencies that need read and write API plus white-label from $50/month, with 5 AI surfaces and Looker Studio connector included. For SEO and marketing agencies handling multiple client brands, AI Peekaboo is the self-serve AEO alternative without sales call.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
AisoOmniaAisoOmniaAisoOmniaOmniaBoth platforms are credible AI visibility tools aimed at small in-house teams at similar price points, but they solve different parts of the GEO workflow. Aiso at $79/month helps you discover prompts through conversation analysis with three-state scoring. Omnia at €79/month helps you act on visibility data through weekly action plans plus MCP integration across seven engines. The choice is essentially discovery-versus-execution as your bigger gap.
Bottom line
If your priority is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) prompt discovery grounded in real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations, Aiso at $79/month is the more purposeful fit. If your priority is a weekly action plan plus MCP integration that lets you act on visibility data from inside Claude or ChatGPT, Omnia at €79/month is the more execution-oriented choice. Pick the platform that matches where your team is on the maturity curve.
Frequently asked questions
How does Aiso compare to Omnia for AI visibility monitoring?
Aiso at $79/month is a prompt discovery platform with three-engine coverage, three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring, and a Conversation Explorer that surfaces real ChatGPT and Gemini prompts. Omnia at €79/month tracks seven engines with daily monitoring, weekly prioritized action plans, and MCP integration that connects to Claude or ChatGPT. Aiso fits the discovery phase; Omnia fits teams wanting weekly execution guidance and agentic workflow integration.
Is Omnia worth the cost for weekly action plans and MCP integration?
For small marketing teams that want a weekly action plan alongside monitoring data, Omnia is genuinely useful. The MCP integration alone, which lets you pull share-of-voice data and generate recommendations from inside Claude or ChatGPT, is a meaningful differentiator. For teams that just need prompt discovery without weekly execution guidance, Aiso at $79/month covers the use case.
How much does Aiso cost compared to Omnia?
Aiso starts at $79/month on Starter, $239/month on Growth, and Custom on Enterprise. Omnia starts at €79/month on Growth, €279/month on Pro, and €499+/month on Enterprise, all with a 14-day free trial and no credit card required. Omnia includes API access on Growth while Aiso reserves API access for Enterprise. The right comparison depends on whether conversation discovery or weekly action plans matter more.
Which tool has better prompt discovery for AI visibility?
Aiso is the answer here. Its Conversation Explorer analyzes real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations to surface prompts actual users are asking in your category, removing guesswork from prompt set definition at $79/month. Omnia assumes you already know your prompt set; it does not have an equivalent prompt discovery layer. For teams entering Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for the first time, Aiso is the more purposeful fit.
Does Aiso or Omnia have MCP integration?
Omnia includes an MCP server on every paid plan including Growth at €79/month, connecting the platform directly to Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor. Aiso does not expose an MCP server at any tier. For teams building agentic workflows around AI visibility data, Omnia is the better fit. For pure prompt discovery inside a web dashboard, Aiso is sufficient.
How many AI engines does each tool track?
Aiso tracks three engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) on every plan. Omnia tracks seven engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Claude, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini) on every plan. For brands whose audiences use Claude, Copilot, or Google AI Mode, Omnia is the broader-coverage choice. For teams focused on conversation discovery in the three most common engines, Aiso is sufficient.