Aiso vs Trakkr in 2026: Conversation discovery vs free-tier monitoring with citation source tracking
Two AI visibility platforms at different price points with different starting strategies. Aiso leads with paid conversation analysis at $79/month. Trakkr leads with a usable free tier and citation source tracking from $100/month Growth.
Aiso
Trakkr- Aiso starts at $79/month for three-engine tracking with a Conversation Explorer. Trakkr offers a functional free tier covering 4 engines with no credit card required, plus paid Growth at $100/month with API access.
- Aiso tracks three AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) with three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring. Trakkr tracks 4 engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity) including citation source logging on every plan.
- Trakkr includes citation source identification that logs which URLs AI models cite in answers, on every plan including the free tier. Aiso focuses on prompt discovery and three-state scoring rather than citation source identification.
- Aiso reserves API access for Enterprise tier only. Trakkr includes API access on the Growth plan at $100/month and above, so neither tool exposes API access on the entry tier.
- Trakkr does not track Google AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, or Google AI Mode. Aiso also does not include those surfaces, so neither tool covers Google AI at this comparison.
- For Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) teams in the discovery phase needing conversation-led prompt research, Aiso is the more purposeful fit at $79/month. For teams wanting a usable free tier plus citation source tracking, Trakkr is the most accessible choice at $0 to $100/month.
If you are weighing AI visibility tools at the entry tier, Aiso and Trakkr both fit in-house budgets but solve different parts of the GEO workflow. Aiso uses a Conversation Explorer to surface real ChatGPT and Gemini prompts, tracks three engines with three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring at $79/month. Trakkr offers a functional free tier that covers ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with no credit card required, plus citation source tracking that logs which URLs AI models cite, with paid Growth at $100/month including API access. How does Aiso compare to Trakkr for teams weighing conversation-led discovery against free-tier monitoring with citation intelligence? Both serve Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) programmes, but Aiso focuses on discovery while Trakkr focuses on low-friction entry plus citation source visibility. The right pick depends on whether discovery depth or entry accessibility with citation tracking is your bigger gap.
The tools at a glance
Aiso
AI search optimization using real ChatGPT and Gemini conversation analysis
Aiso is an AI search optimization platform that focuses on prompt discovery. Its Conversation Explorer analyzes real conversations happening in ChatGPT and Gemini to surface the prompts actual users are asking in your category. For teams entering Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for the first time, this removes a significant amount of upfront prompt engineering work and grounds the monitoring programme in real usage data.
The platform tracks three AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity) and uses a three-state scoring model: Mentioned, Recommended, or Absent. This scoring is more informative than a binary cited or not cited metric, since being mentioned in a long list of alternatives and being actively recommended as a solution represent meaningfully different brand outcomes. Aiso also tracks fan-out patterns: the secondary prompts users ask after an initial query.
The trade-off versus Trakkr is entry accessibility. Aiso has no free tier and starts at $79/month, while Trakkr offers a usable free tier covering four engines with no credit card required. For teams that need conversation-led prompt discovery and have budget allocated, Aiso is the right starting point at $79/month.
| Feature | Starter $79/month | Growth $239/month | Enterprise Custom pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Conversation Explorer | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Fan-out tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Trakkr
Free-tier AI search monitoring across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with citation source tracking
Trakkr is an AI search monitoring platform that tracks where your brand and its competitors appear in answers from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. The free entry tier lets you start monitoring without a credit card, which makes it one of the lowest-friction ways to get initial AI visibility data on any brand.
Beyond mention tracking, Trakkr identifies the source URLs cited in AI-generated answers. This citation source view tells you which specific pages are being pulled into AI responses, both yours and competitors. This data is actionable: if a competitor's blog post is cited repeatedly while your equivalent page is not, that is a direct optimization target. Most tools at this price point report brand mentions but not the source pages driving those mentions.
The trade-off versus Aiso is the discovery layer. Trakkr assumes you already know your prompt set; it does not analyze real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations to surface prompts the way Aiso's Conversation Explorer does. For teams wanting a usable free tier plus citation source tracking, Trakkr is the most accessible choice. For pure discovery depth, Aiso at $79/month is the more purposeful fit.
| Feature | Free Free | Growth $100/month | Scale $500/month | Enterprise Custom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Monitoring frequency | Limited | Regular | Daily | Custom |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor tracking | 1 competitor | Up to 5 | Up to 20 | Custom |
| API access | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | On request |
| Email alerts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Aiso | Trakkr |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity | 4 (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity) |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes (Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring) | Yes (citation source tracking) |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Partial (via fan-out tracking) | Partial |
| Category intelligence | Yes (GPT Trends) | No |
| AEO content generation | No | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Enterprise plan only | Growth ($100/mo) and above |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No native connector | No native connector |
| White-label delivery | No | No (on request Enterprise) |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No (seat-based plans) | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | No | No |
| Starting price | $79/mo | Free |
Need a self-serve white-label option beyond Aiso and Trakkr?
Neither Aiso nor Trakkr offers white-label delivery on standard plans, and both lock API access behind higher tiers. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool for agencies with white-label reports, guest access links, and read and write API on every plan from $50/month Starter. For SEO and marketing agencies that need multi-brand support with self-serve signup and a Looker Studio connector on every plan, AI Peekaboo covers what both tools leave to enterprise contracts or omit entirely.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
AisoTrakkrAisoTrakkrAisoTrakkrAisoBoth tools are credible AI visibility platforms for in-house teams, but they sit at very different price points and entry strategies. Aiso at $79/month is a paid prompt discovery platform with conversation analysis and three-state scoring. Trakkr offers a usable free tier with citation source tracking plus paid Growth at $100/month with API access. The choice is essentially paid discovery depth versus free-tier accessibility with citation intelligence as your bigger gap.
Bottom line
If your priority is Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) prompt discovery grounded in real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations with three-state scoring, Aiso at $79/month is the more purposeful fit. If your priority is a usable free tier plus citation source tracking with API access at $100/month Growth, Trakkr is the more accessible choice. Pick the entry strategy that matches your budget and discovery needs.
Frequently asked questions
How does Aiso compare to Trakkr for AI visibility monitoring?
Aiso at $79/month is a prompt discovery platform with three-engine coverage, three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring, and a Conversation Explorer that surfaces real ChatGPT and Gemini prompts. Trakkr offers a usable free tier covering 4 engines with citation source tracking on every plan including free, plus paid Growth at $100/month with API access. Aiso fits the discovery phase; Trakkr fits teams wanting low-friction entry plus citation intelligence.
Is Trakkr's free tier actually usable for AI visibility monitoring?
Yes. Trakkr's free tier covers brand mention tracking across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity with limited query volume and monitoring frequency. It is sufficient to verify whether your brand appears in AI answers and see one or two competitors, but not for ongoing high-volume tracking. No credit card is required to start. For teams that want to evaluate before committing, Trakkr is the lowest-friction entry in the category.
How much does Aiso cost compared to Trakkr?
Aiso starts at $79/month on Starter, $239/month on Growth, and Custom on Enterprise. Trakkr is free on its entry tier, then $100/month on Growth, $500/month on Scale, and Custom on Enterprise. Trakkr has a clear price advantage at the entry tier with a usable free tier, while Aiso is comparable in paid tier pricing. The right pick depends on whether you need conversation discovery (Aiso) or free-tier accessibility (Trakkr).
Which tool has better prompt discovery for AI visibility?
Aiso is the answer here. Its Conversation Explorer analyzes real ChatGPT and Gemini conversations to surface prompts actual users are asking in your category, removing guesswork from prompt set definition at $79/month. Trakkr assumes you already know your prompt set; it does not have an equivalent prompt discovery layer. For teams entering Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for the first time, Aiso is the more purposeful fit.
How many AI engines does each tool track?
Aiso tracks three engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) on every plan with three-state Mentioned, Recommended, Absent scoring. Trakkr tracks 4 engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity) on every plan including the free tier. For brands whose audiences use Claude, Trakkr is the only choice between these two. For teams focused on conversation discovery in the three most common engines, Aiso is sufficient.
Does Trakkr have citation source tracking?
Yes. Trakkr logs which URLs AI models cite in answers on every plan including the free tier, showing which specific pages are being cited, not just which brands appear. Aiso does not expose citation source tracking as a primary feature, focusing instead on prompt discovery and three-state scoring. For content teams that need to know which pages drive AI citations, Trakkr is the better fit.