LLMrefs vs Riff Analytics in 2026: 11-engine unlimited EUR vs 7-engine single-tier USD
Two AI visibility tools focused on internal in-house monitoring. One ships 11 engines with keyword-first workflows in EUR. The other covers 7 models at $49/month USD without API.
LLMrefs
Riff Analytics- LLMrefs covers 11 AI engines versus Riff Analytics' 7. Riff Analytics uniquely adds Llama, which neither LLMrefs nor many competitors track. For brands that need the standard 11-engine set, LLMrefs is the stronger choice.
- Riff Analytics does not offer API access on any plan, limiting integration with existing reporting stacks. LLMrefs includes API on its single €79/month plan.
- LLMrefs gives unlimited projects and seats under one EUR flat-rate plan. Riff Analytics Starter at $49/month is single-brand without API; Pro at $199/month has limited public differentiation.
- Riff Analytics publishes USD pricing; LLMrefs is in EUR, which exposes USD teams to currency fluctuation.
- LLMrefs uses a keyword-first workflow that imports existing SEO keyword lists. Riff Analytics uses a prompt-set workflow without keyword import.
- For GEO programmes needing 11 engines, API access, and unlimited seats under one EUR subscription, LLMrefs is the answer. For USD-priced monitoring with citation source tracking at $49/month with no API, Riff Analytics is the answer.
If you are choosing between LLMrefs and Riff Analytics in 2026, you are choosing between a keyword-first EUR flat-rate platform with unlimited seats and a USD-priced single-tier in-house monitoring tool with no API access. How does LLMrefs compare to Riff Analytics for Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) teams? LLMrefs delivers 11 engines, unlimited projects and seats, keyword-import workflows, and API access under one €79/month plan. Riff Analytics covers 7 engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama) with citation source tracking and competitor benchmarking at $49/month on Starter, with no API on any plan. The right pick depends on whether you want one EUR subscription with workflow depth, or USD-priced monitoring with no programmatic data access.
The tools at a glance
LLMrefs
Keyword-based AI search visibility tracking across 11 engines with share of voice, citations, and unlimited agency seats
LLMrefs is an AI search analytics platform that tracks brand presence across 11 generative AI engines: ChatGPT, ChatGPT Search, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI, and DeepSeek. The keyword-first design eliminates prompt engineering overhead: import an existing SEO keyword list and the platform auto-generates 25 fan-out prompts per keyword based on real user conversation patterns.
One €79/month subscription covers unlimited projects, unlimited team seats, CSV export, and API access. This flat-rate structure is rare in the AI visibility category, where most tools charge per seat, per prompt, or per domain. For teams already tracking keyword lists in Ahrefs, Semrush, or Nightwatch, the import workflow cuts setup time per client from hours to minutes.
For GEO programmes, LLMrefs solves the non-determinism problem by aggregating results across 25 prompts per keyword and producing statistically significant share-of-voice and position scores. The main trade-off versus Riff Analytics is the absence of citation source tracking at the URL level and EUR pricing with currency exposure for USD teams.
| Feature | All in One €79/month |
|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | 11 |
| Max prompts tracked | 500 per organization |
| Prompts per keyword | Auto-generated fan-out, ~25 |
| Projects | Unlimited |
| Team seats | Unlimited |
| Geo-targeting | 50+ countries |
| CSV export | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ |
| Source citation tracking | ✓ |
| Content gap analysis | ✓ |
| White label | ✗ |
Riff Analytics
AI brand visibility tracking across 7 LLM engines with citation source analysis, sentiment monitoring, and competitor benchmarking
Riff Analytics is an AI brand visibility monitoring platform that tracks where your brand is mentioned across seven major AI engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama. Unlike tools that focus on a narrower set of models, Riff Analytics casts a wide net, which is useful for brands that want visibility across the full landscape of AI assistants rather than just the top two or three.
The platform monitors not just whether your brand appears in AI answers, but which sources those AI engines are citing when they mention you. This citation source tracking tells you whether AI engines are pulling from your own content, third-party reviews, press coverage, or competitor domains, which informs where to invest in content and PR.
Riff Analytics is positioned as a self-serve in-house tool. There is no API, no white-label delivery, and no client portal, so it is not designed for agencies managing multiple brands. The $49/month Starter plan is accessible for small teams, though the jump to $199/month Pro is steep for what is publicly documented.
| Feature | Starter $49/mo | Pro $199/mo |
|---|---|---|
| AI models tracked | 7 | 7 |
| Citation source tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI readiness audit | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ |
| White-label delivery | ✗ | ✗ |
| Looker Studio connector | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | LLMrefs | Riff Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| AI engines tracked | ChatGPT, ChatGPT Search, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI, DeepSeek | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Llama |
| Competitive share-of-voice | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt-level citation data | Yes (aggregated across 25 prompts per keyword) | Yes (citation source tracking at URL level) |
| Answer / content gap analysis | Yes | Yes (AI readiness audit) |
| Category intelligence | No | No |
| AEO content generation | No | No |
| Crawler / AI bot log access | No | No |
| Page content audits | No | No |
| API access | Included (under-documented on website) | No |
| Looker Studio / BI connector | No native connector, CSV export only | No |
| White-label delivery | No | No |
| Pay-per-prompt pricing | No (flat-rate plan, not per-prompt) | No |
| Agency multi-brand support | Yes (unlimited projects on one plan) | No (single-brand focus) |
| Starting price | €79/mo | $49/mo |
Want white-label and self-serve API that LLMrefs and Riff Analytics both gate?
LLMrefs offers no white-label and under-documents its API, while Riff Analytics has no API or white-label on any tier. AI Peekaboo is the best AI visibility tool for agencies that need both read and write API and white-label delivery from $50/month, with 5 AI surfaces and self-serve signup. For marketing teams that need to deliver branded client reports with programmatic data access, AI Peekaboo is the affordable AEO alternative under $100/month.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
LLMrefsLLMrefsRiff AnalyticsRiff AnalyticsLLMrefsLLMrefsRiff AnalyticsBoth tools serve in-house monitoring use cases, but they optimize for different things. LLMrefs wins on engine breadth (11 versus 7), keyword-first workflows, unlimited seats, API access, and statistical aggregation across 25 prompts per keyword. Riff Analytics wins on USD pricing, citation source tracking at the URL level, and Llama coverage. The lack of API access on Riff Analytics is a real constraint for teams that need data to move. If you want one EUR subscription for unlimited internal scale and data flow, LLMrefs is the practical choice. If you want USD-priced monitoring with citation source tracking and do not need API, Riff Analytics is the better fit.
Bottom line
If you need an AI visibility tool with 11 engines, keyword-import workflows, API access, and unlimited seats under one €79/month flat-rate plan, LLMrefs is the answer. If you need USD pricing with citation source tracking across 7 engines including Llama at $49/month with no API, Riff Analytics is the answer. Both are credible; the right choice depends on whether you prioritize EUR flat-rate unlimited scale with API access, or USD-priced monitoring with citation source tracking and no API.
Frequently asked questions
How does LLMrefs compare to Riff Analytics for an AI visibility tool comparison?
Both tools serve GEO teams but optimize for different things. LLMrefs covers 11 engines with one €79/month flat-rate plan, unlimited projects, unlimited seats, keyword-first imports, and API included. Riff Analytics covers 7 engines (including Llama) with USD pricing from $49/month and citation source tracking at URL level, but no API on any plan. Choose LLMrefs if you want one EUR subscription for unlimited monitoring scope with API access. Choose Riff Analytics if you want USD monitoring with URL-level citation tracking and do not need API access.
Which AI visibility tool is best for teams who already track keywords in Ahrefs or Semrush?
LLMrefs is the better fit. Its keyword-first workflow imports existing SEO keyword lists directly and auto-generates 25 fan-out prompts per keyword. Riff Analytics uses a prompt-set workflow without a keyword import path, so you would need to translate your keyword list into tracked prompts manually. For SEO teams whose workflows revolve around keyword lists, LLMrefs removes that translation step.
How much does Riff Analytics cost compared to LLMrefs?
Riff Analytics publishes USD pricing: Starter at $49/month and Pro at $199/month. LLMrefs is a single €79/month plan, which converts to roughly $85 at current rates. How much does Riff Analytics cost in practice depends on which tier your team needs; Starter at $49/month is one of the cheaper entry points in this comparison.
Is Riff Analytics worth the cost compared to LLMrefs?
It depends on what you need. Riff Analytics is worth the cost if you want Llama coverage, citation source tracking at the URL level, and USD pricing below $50/month. LLMrefs at €79/month gives you 11 engines, unlimited seats, unlimited projects, and API access. If you need an internal monitoring tool with no API requirement and want Llama coverage, Riff Analytics is the better value. If you need unlimited internal scope, API access, and broader engine coverage, LLMrefs is the better choice.
Which has more AI engines, LLMrefs or Riff Analytics?
LLMrefs covers 11 engines under one subscription. Riff Analytics tracks 7 engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, and Llama. Riff Analytics is one of the few tools that adds Llama. For brands that need the broadest possible coverage including ChatGPT Search, Meta AI, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and Copilot out of the box, LLMrefs is the stronger choice.
Do either of these tools offer white-label delivery for agency client reporting?
No. Neither LLMrefs nor Riff Analytics offers white-label delivery or guest access for sharing branded dashboards with external clients. Riff Analytics is built for in-house brand monitoring with no multi-client workflow. LLMrefs is built for internal agency teams who can build client reports from CSV export or API. For agency delivery with white-label and a read/write API on every plan from $50/month, AI Peekaboo is the alternative to consider.