Autoklose vs Landbase in 2026: Bundled outreach database vs AI account discovery layer
One ships a lead database and a sequencer in the same subscription. The other skips sequencing entirely and instead lets you query accounts in plain English, then hands the list to whatever outreach tool you already run.
Autoklose bundles a lead database and email sequencer in one product; Landbase only does discovery and enrichment, and expects you to send from elsewhere.
Landbase resolves natural-language account queries, including tech stack and department headcount filters, in seconds. Autoklose has no query-language layer at all.
Landbase publishes a full pricing ladder from $0 to $499/month with per-credit costs listed. Autoklose publishes no pricing anywhere and requires a sales conversation at every tier.
Landbase includes 1,000 free credits (about $49 of value) with no credit card required, so a team can test real queries before paying anything.
Autoklose includes team collaboration and shared campaign reporting from its Small Business tier up; Landbase does not document native sequencer or CRM integrations.
Landbase charges 1 credit per verified email and 10 credits per verified mobile number, and does not charge for failed lookups. Autoklose bundles database access into a flat, unpublished subscription fee.
Autoklose is backed by VanillaSoft's broader sales engagement platform, including lead routing and call management, for teams that want one vendor relationship.
Autoklose and Landbase both sit upstream of a sales conversation, but they solve different halves of the outbound problem. Autoklose, part of VanillaSoft, bundles a B2B contact database with email sequence automation so a small sales team can find prospects and email them without buying data separately, though its pricing is contact-sales-only and its API story is thin. Landbase skips the sequencer altogether: it uses an AI model called GTM-2 Omni to answer natural-language account queries ("US SaaS companies on Salesforce and HubSpot with 50+ engineers") that Autoklose has no equivalent for, then charges credits only for verified contacts it actually returns. Autoklose asks you to trust a database curated for you; Landbase asks you to describe what you want and pay per result, with the sending left to a separate tool.
The tools at a glance
Autoklose
Email automation platform with a built-in B2B lead database, letting sales teams reach thousands of prospects from a single tool.
The pitch behind Autoklose is consolidation: a sales rep opens one tool, pulls prospects from the built-in B2B database by filtering on industry, company size, job title, and location, then drops them straight into an email sequence. There is no export-import step between finding a contact and emailing them, which is the friction Autoklose is built to remove for small teams that cannot justify a separate ZoomInfo or Apollo subscription on top of an outreach tool.
Once a list is loaded, sequences run on autopilot: multi-step follow-ups, automatic pausing on reply, and personalization tokens pulled from prospect and company fields. Campaign reporting rolls up open, reply, and click-through rates per sequence so a manager can see which steps in a cadence are actually landing. Team collaboration, shared prospect visibility, and lead assignment become available starting at the Small Business tier, which matters for sales managers running more than one rep.
What Autoklose does not do is tell you what any of this costs until you talk to sales, and it does not publish meaningful detail on its API or native integrations beyond the VanillaSoft ecosystem it belongs to. For a team already on VanillaSoft, that is a non-issue. For a team evaluating it cold against something like Landbase, the lack of a self-serve price or a documented query language is the first thing that will feel dated.
| Feature | Starter Contact for pricing | Small Business Contact for pricing | Enterprise Contact for pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Email sequence automation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Built-in lead database | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Campaign reporting | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team collaboration | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| CRM integrations | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| VanillaSoft integration | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated support | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Landbase
GTM data platform that uses AI agents to find, qualify, and prioritize B2B accounts from a natural language prompt.
Landbase starts from a different assumption: the hard part of outbound is not sending email, it is defining exactly which accounts deserve one. So instead of filter menus, you describe the account in a sentence, something like companies with $10M to $50M ARR running Salesforce and HubSpot with 50 or more engineers, and the GTM-2 Omni model, trained on more than 50 million GTM campaigns, returns matches in seconds. That is a query Autoklose's filter-based database cannot execute at all.
Every account that comes back is scored for ICP fit before you spend a credit, since search and qualification are free and only verified contact retrieval costs money: 1 credit per email, 10 credits per verified mobile number, nothing charged on a failed lookup. A lookalike expansion feature takes your current customer list and finds structurally similar accounts, and a CLI lets technical teams query the platform straight from Claude Code or Codex rather than through a UI.
The trade-off is that Landbase stops exactly where Autoklose starts: there is no sequencer, no email sending, and no documented native integration into a CRM or outreach tool. It is a data and qualification layer, full stop, which means a team adopting it still needs a second product, whether that is Autoklose, HubSpot Sequences, or something else, to actually run the campaign.
| Feature | Free $0 | Starter $49/mo | Most Popular $149/mo | Professional $299/mo | Enterprise $499/mo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credits included | 1,000 (one-time) | 1K/mo | 3.5K/mo | 7.5K/mo | 15K/mo |
| Cost per email | $0.049 | $0.049 | $0.043 | $0.040 | $0.033 |
| Cost per phone | $0.49 | $0.49 | $0.43 | $0.40 | $0.33 |
| Account search & AI qualification | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Lookalike expansion | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Credit card required | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Built-in contact/account database | Yes, built-in B2B lead database filterable by industry, size, title, and location | Yes, discovery-focused rather than a pre-loaded static list |
| Sequencing and outreach execution | Yes, full email sequence automation with follow-ups and reply tracking | No, Landbase finds and qualifies accounts but does not send sequences |
| AI-powered account qualification | Not offered | Yes, every account scored for ICP fit via GTM-2 Omni at zero credit cost |
| Natural language query building | No, filters are configured manually rather than via a natural-language prompt | Yes, including tech stack, department headcount, and funding-stage filters |
| Contact enrichment pricing model | Bundled flat into the subscription, not billed per verified contact | Pay-per-verified-result: 1 credit per email, 10 credits per phone, nothing for failed lookups |
| CRM integrations | Yes, from Small Business tier up | Not prominently documented as native integrations |
| Team collaboration | Yes, from Small Business tier up | Not a core feature; built around discovery, not campaign management |
| API access | Not clearly documented | Yes, plus a CLI for Claude Code and Codex environments |
| Free trial / free tier | No published free trial; ask sales about current offers | Yes, 1,000 free credits (~$49 value), no credit card required |
| Starting price | Contact for pricing | $0 to start, paid plans from $49/month |
Which should you choose?
These two are not really competing for the same budget line. Autoklose is a complete, if opaque, outbound package: database plus sequencer plus reporting, sold through a sales conversation. Landbase is a precision instrument for the first step of that process, account discovery, and it deliberately stops before the send button. A team that wants one vendor and one invoice will lean toward Autoklose. A team that has found its current prospecting to be too coarse, whether that is Apollo's filters or a spreadsheet, will get more out of Landbase's natural-language queries, even knowing it needs a second tool afterward.
Bottom line
Choose Autoklose if you want database and sequencing in one subscription and do not mind opaque pricing. Choose Landbase if your actual bottleneck is finding the right accounts in the first place, and you already have, or are willing to add, a sequencer to send to them. Running both at once is reasonable for a team that has outgrown Autoklose's database but likes its sending workflow, since Landbase never claims to replace that half of the stack.
Frequently asked questions
Can Landbase replace Autoklose for cold email outreach?
No, not on its own: Landbase has no sequencer or sending feature at all, so it cannot replace Autoklose as an outreach tool by itself. It replaces the account discovery and enrichment half of the workflow, and a team using it for outbound still needs a separate sequencer, which could be Autoklose, to actually send and track email.
Why does Autoklose not show pricing on its website?
Autoklose sells exclusively through a sales conversation, with all three tiers, Starter, Small Business, and Enterprise, listed as contact for pricing rather than published dollar amounts. This is common for VanillaSoft-family products but it does mean you cannot compare cost against a self-serve tool like Landbase without booking a call first.
Is Landbase worth it if I just need a bigger contact database, not natural-language search?
It can still be worth it, since account search and AI qualification are free on every Landbase plan and you only spend credits when a verified email or phone number is actually delivered. But if natural-language filtering is not something you need, a flat-fee bundled database like Autoklose's may be simpler to budget against than a credit-based model.
Does Autoklose include AI account qualification like Landbase does?
No, Autoklose does not offer AI-based ICP scoring; its database is filtered manually by industry, company size, job title, and location rather than scored by a model. Landbase's GTM-2 Omni model qualifies every returned account for ICP fit at no credit cost before you decide whether to enrich it.
Which tool is cheaper for a small sales team just getting started?
Landbase has the lower visible barrier to entry: 1,000 free credits worth roughly $49, no credit card required, and paid plans starting at $49/month with published per-credit costs. Autoklose requires a sales conversation before you learn any price, which makes early-stage cost comparison harder even if the eventual bundled cost turns out competitive.
Can I use Landbase's CLI to pull accounts directly into a coding workflow?
Yes, Landbase ships a CLI that installs into AI coding environments like Claude Code and Codex, letting developers or technical GTM teams query accounts programmatically rather than through the web interface. Autoklose has no comparable CLI or documented API depth for this kind of workflow.

