JetOctopus vs Seolyzer in 2026: published EUR pricing vs demo-only cross-analysis
One tells you the price on the website and tracks 40+ bots including GPTBot and ClaudeBot. The other keeps pricing behind a demo call but fuses crawl data, logs, and Search Console into a single cross-analysis view neither tool matches on its own.
JetOctopus
Seolyzer- JetOctopus publishes pricing starting at 293 EUR per month for its base 500K plan. Seolyzer discloses no pricing anywhere on its site and routes every tier through a demo request.
- JetOctopus tracks more than 40 bots, including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot, through a dedicated AI Search Visibility module. Seolyzer's own FAQ states it has no AI search monitoring or LLM visibility tracking at all.
- Seolyzer's cross-analysis mode fuses crawl data, real-time log streaming, and Google Search Console signals into one view. JetOctopus keeps those same three data sources in separate connected modules rather than one fused view.
- Seolyzer offers a documented API on its Professional tier and above, which ManoMano uses to extract millions of internal links for data science work. JetOctopus does not document a public API anywhere in its own materials.
- JetOctopus includes unlimited users and unlimited projects on every plan. Seolyzer does not disclose seat or project limits on any tier because none of its pricing is public.
- JetOctopus extends Google Search Console data retention to 16+ months via bulk API. Seolyzer lists a standard GSC integration with no stated retention extension beyond what Google itself provides.
- Seolyzer is GDPR compliant with data hosted in Europe, stated explicitly on its own FAQ. JetOctopus's tool profile does not mention EU hosting or GDPR certification.
JetOctopus and Seolyzer both start from the same premise: a crawler alone cannot tell you what a bot actually did on your site, so server logs need to be part of the picture. Where they diverge is how they package that idea. JetOctopus builds six modules, including a JS crawler, a log analyzer, GSC and GA4 integrations, an AI internal linker, and a dedicated AI bot tracking layer, into one platform with published, if modular, EUR pricing starting at 293 a month. Seolyzer keeps its feature set tighter but adds something JetOctopus does not claim: a cross-analysis mode that fuses crawl, log, and GSC data into a single view to surface contradictions a siloed tool would miss. Seolyzer discloses no pricing anywhere on its site; every plan routes through a demo request. Neither is the obvious pick until you know whether AI bot visibility or data-fusion diagnostics matters more to the work in front of you.
The tools at a glance
JetOctopus
SEO crawler and log analyzer for large sites that combines crawl data, server logs, GSC, and GA4 into one platform with no seat or project limits
JetOctopus packages six modules under one login: a JavaScript crawler, a log analyzer, a GSC integration, a GA4 integration, an AI internal linker, and real-time alerts. The pitch is that a technical SEO team should not need to stitch together a crawler, a separate log tool, and manual GSC exports to see the full lifecycle of a page from first crawl to organic traffic.
The log analyzer is where JetOctopus pulls furthest ahead of Seolyzer on a specific axis: bot identification. It validates and tracks activity from more than 40 bots by name, including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot, and a dedicated AI Search Visibility module compares what those AI crawlers can reach against what Googlebot reaches. Seolyzer has no equivalent, by its own admission.
Pricing is public but not simple. The base 500K plan runs 293 EUR a month billed annually, with crawl pages, log lines, and GSC properties sold as separate add-on modules priced in EUR. That is more upfront honesty than Seolyzer offers, but it still takes real arithmetic to know what a specific site will cost before you commit, and there is no self-serve trial to test the platform first.
| Feature | 500K Plan 293 EUR/month (billed annually) | Add-on: Crawl from 138 EUR/month | Add-on: Logs from 86 EUR/month | Add-on: GSC from 43 EUR/month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crawl pages included | 500K (or 250K JS) | Up to 10M+ | N/A | N/A |
| Log lines included | 2M | N/A | Up to 50M | N/A |
| User limits | None | None | None | None |
| AI bot tracking | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Seolyzer
Technical SEO data platform combining site crawling, real-time log analysis, and Google Search Console in one interface
Seolyzer's core idea is cross-analysis: instead of viewing crawl data, server logs, and Google Search Console as three separate reports, it fuses them into one view so you can see, for example, a page that Googlebot rarely visits despite GSC showing impressions for it. That kind of discrepancy is exactly the sort of thing that gets lost when three tools live in three tabs.
The platform has real enterprise credibility behind it. Testimonials come from the Head of SEO at Club Med and at ManoMano, with an endorsement from Aleyda Solis. ManoMano specifically uses Seolyzer's API to pull millions of internal links for its data science team, which is a meaningfully different use case than dashboard viewing and signals the tool is built to plug into larger workflows, not just sit on top of them.
What Seolyzer does not offer is transparency or AI bot coverage. There is no public pricing page anywhere, every tier routes through a demo request, and the platform is explicit in its own FAQ that it does not track AI search visibility, LLM mentions, or AI Overviews at all. If bot-level AI visibility matters for your work, this is not the tool, regardless of what the demo call quotes you.
| Feature | Starter Contact for pricing | Professional Contact for pricing | Enterprise Contact for pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Crawler | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Log analysis | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cross-analysis (data fusion) | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | JetOctopus | Seolyzer |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment model | Cloud, modular by crawl and log volume | Cloud, tiered by feature access |
| Overall score | 8.6 / 10 | 7.8 / 10 |
| Pricing transparency | Public, from 293 EUR/month | Not public, demo required |
| AI bot tracking (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) | Yes, 40+ bots including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot | No, focused entirely on traditional crawl and indexing health |
| Real-time log streaming | Yes | Yes |
| Cross-analysis (crawl + logs + GSC fused) | Data lives across six connected modules rather than one fused view | Yes, on Professional tier and above |
| JavaScript crawler | Yes, up to 250 pages/second from the cloud | Not documented |
| GSC data retention | 16+ months via bulk API | Standard GSC integration, no stated retention extension |
| GA4 integration | Yes | Not documented |
| API access | Not documented | Yes, Professional tier and above |
| Seat / project limits | None on any plan | Not documented, pricing is not public |
| GDPR / EU hosting | Not documented | Yes, GDPR compliant with European data hosting |
| Starting price | 293 EUR/month (billed annually) | Contact for pricing |
Which should you choose?
JetOctopusJetOctopusSeolyzerSeolyzerJetOctopusSeolyzerThese two tools overlap on the log-plus-crawl premise but solve different diagnostic problems. JetOctopus is built to show you which bots, human and AI, actually reach which pages, and it tells you what that will cost before you pick up the phone. Seolyzer is built to show you where your crawl data, your logs, and your GSC numbers disagree with each other, and it makes you talk to sales to find out what that costs. Pick based on which discrepancy you are actually trying to catch: bot access gaps, or cross-source data contradictions.
Bottom line
Choose JetOctopus if AI bot visibility is part of the job now, GPTBot and ClaudeBot tracking are not optional, and you want to see a number before booking a call. Choose Seolyzer if your bigger problem is reconciling what your crawler says, what your logs say, and what GSC says about the same pages, and you are willing to sit through a demo to find out the price. If pricing transparency is the deciding factor and AI bot tracking is not a requirement, JetOctopus is still the easier tool to budget for even with its EUR-modular structure, since at least the numbers are on the page.
Frequently asked questions
Does Seolyzer track AI bots like GPTBot the way JetOctopus does?
No, Seolyzer does not track AI bots at all. Its own FAQ states plainly that the platform focuses entirely on traditional search crawl health, with no AI search monitoring, LLM visibility tracking, or AI Overviews coverage, while JetOctopus tracks more than 40 bots by name including GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot through a dedicated AI Search Visibility module.
Why does Seolyzer not show pricing on its website?
Seolyzer routes all three of its tiers, Starter, Professional, and Enterprise, through a demo request rather than publishing prices, which typically signals enterprise-level deals negotiated per account. JetOctopus, by contrast, publishes its base 500K plan at 293 EUR per month with add-on pricing listed for crawl, log, and GSC volume.
What is cross-analysis in Seolyzer and does JetOctopus have anything similar?
Cross-analysis is Seolyzer's feature for fusing crawl data, real-time log streaming, and Google Search Console signals into a single view, so you can spot pages that are crawled but not indexed or that GSC shows impressions for despite little Googlebot activity. JetOctopus covers the same three data sources but keeps them as separate connected modules rather than one fused analysis view.
Which tool has a real API for pulling crawl and link data programmatically?
Seolyzer documents API access on its Professional tier and above, and ManoMano specifically uses it to extract millions of internal links for data science work. JetOctopus does not document an equivalent public API in its own tool materials, so if programmatic data access is a requirement, Seolyzer is the one that confirms it exists.
Is JetOctopus or Seolyzer better for a European agency with GDPR requirements?
Seolyzer states explicitly in its FAQ that it is GDPR compliant with data hosted in Europe, which gives European agencies a documented answer on data residency. JetOctopus's own tool profile does not address GDPR or hosting location, so agencies with strict data residency requirements should confirm directly with JetOctopus before assuming parity.
Do both tools have seat or project limits on their plans?
JetOctopus explicitly includes unlimited users and unlimited projects on every plan, which matters for agencies managing many client accounts under one subscription. Seolyzer does not disclose seat or project limits on any tier since none of its pricing or plan details are public, so agencies would need to ask during the demo.