Lumar vs Screpy in 2026: enterprise consolidation vs a $10-a-month bundle for small sites
Lumar packages AI visibility, accessibility, and crawling into a demo-gated enterprise contract with no public price. Screpy bundles auditing, rank tracking, uptime, and Core Web Vitals into one dashboard starting at $10 a month, with no API on any plan.
Lumar
Screpy- Screpy starts at $10 a month and bundles site auditing, rank tracking, uptime monitoring, and Core Web Vitals into one dashboard. Lumar has no public pricing and requires a sales demo for every deal.
- Lumar tracks brand visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity as part of its platform. Screpy has no AI answer-engine visibility tracking, only AI-generated plain-language explanations of its own audit findings.
- Neither tool offers API access on every plan: Screpy has no API on any tier at all, while Lumar's API is positioned for data export rather than a general integration layer.
- Screpy includes white-label PDF reporting from its $30-a-month Pro tier up, a feature small agencies rarely get at that price. Lumar's white-label capability is not published for its enterprise tier.
- Lumar is the only one of the two with WCAG 2.2 accessibility compliance testing.
- Screpy is in active platform transition with a rebuild in progress, which introduces some uncertainty about feature stability for current subscribers.
Lumar and Screpy are both "everything in one platform" tools, but they are built for buyers at opposite ends of the market. Lumar consolidates technical SEO crawling, AI brand visibility tracking across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, WCAG 2.2 accessibility testing, and Core Web Vitals monitoring into one enterprise contract with no published price and a mandatory demo. Screpy consolidates a lighter version of the same idea, site auditing, keyword rank tracking, uptime monitoring, and Core Web Vitals, into a single $10-a-month dashboard aimed at freelancers and small business owners who cannot justify four separate subscriptions. Neither tool is trying to out-crawl a dedicated tool like Screaming Frog; the real question is which scale of bundle actually matches your budget and your site.
The tools at a glance
Lumar
Enterprise website optimization combining technical SEO, AI visibility, and accessibility
Lumar (formerly DeepCrawl) is built for organizations that need crawling, AI brand visibility tracking, Core Web Vitals monitoring, and WCAG 2.2 accessibility testing to live inside a single vendor relationship. The crawl engine covers the standard technical SEO checklist, redirects, canonicals, hreflang, structured data, internal linking, and an AI-powered prioritization layer ranks issues by likely impact rather than dumping a flat error list.
The AI visibility module is the part that separates Lumar from a conventional crawler: it monitors how a brand appears in AI-generated answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity, sitting next to traditional crawl data instead of living in a separate subscription. For a large brand already tracking a GEO programme, that consolidation removes a tool from the stack rather than adding one.
None of it is quick or cheap. There is no published price and no self-serve signup, every engagement starts with a demo, and the platform assumes a team with dedicated technical SEO resources to configure five different modules. A small business owner evaluating tools on a Tuesday afternoon is not the intended buyer.
| Feature | Enterprise Contact for pricing |
|---|---|
| Technical SEO crawling | ✓ |
| AI brand visibility (GEO/AEO) tracking | ✓ |
| WCAG 2.2 accessibility testing | ✓ |
| Core Web Vitals monitoring | ✓ |
| API access | Yes, for data export |
| Self-serve signup | No, demo required |
Screpy
AI-powered SEO platform combining site audits, rank tracking, page speed monitoring, and uptime checks from $10 a month
Screpy takes the same "one platform instead of many" idea as Lumar and applies it to a completely different budget. For $10 a month, the Lite plan covers site auditing, keyword rank tracking, page speed and Core Web Vitals monitoring, and uptime checks, with AI used to turn raw crawl errors into plain-language, prioritized recommendations rather than a technical dump.
The unlimited projects and unlimited team members on every tier, including Lite, stand out at this price: a freelancer managing ten client sites is not paying per site the way they would with most competitors. White-label PDF reporting kicks in at the $30-a-month Pro tier, letting small agencies hand clients a branded report without stepping up to a much pricier platform.
The trade-off is depth and stability. Audit checks and crawl limits are noticeably lighter than a dedicated crawler, there is no API on any plan, and the platform is currently mid-rebuild, which the company signals openly but which still adds some uncertainty for teams that dislike moving targets in their tool stack.
| Feature | Lite $10/month | Pro $30/month | Advanced $59/month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly credits | 2,500 | 8,000 | 30,000 |
| Unlimited projects | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rank tracker | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor tracking | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| White-label PDF reports | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Head-to-head feature comparison
| Feature | Lumar | Screpy |
|---|---|---|
| Full-site technical SEO crawl | Yes | Yes (lighter crawl depth) |
| AI brand visibility (GEO/AEO) tracking | Yes (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) | No |
| Keyword rank tracking | No | Yes |
| Uptime monitoring | No | Yes |
| Core Web Vitals / page speed monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| WCAG 2.2 accessibility testing | Yes (WCAG 2.2) | No |
| AI-generated recommendations | Yes (AI-powered issue prioritization) | Yes |
| White-label reporting | Not publicly detailed | Pro tier and above |
| API access | Yes, for data export | No |
| Self-serve signup (no sales call) | No (demo required) | Yes |
| Unlimited team members | Not publicly detailed | Yes, on every plan |
| Starting price | Custom (sales-led) | $10/month |
Considering AI Peekaboo alongside Lumar and Screpy?
Lumar bundles AI brand visibility tracking for ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity into an enterprise contract with no public price. Screpy has no AI answer-engine visibility tracking at all; its AI use is limited to explaining audit findings in plain language. Neither gives a small team a straightforward, affordable way to monitor brand mentions in AI search results. AI Peekaboo ships a dedicated read and write API on every plan from $50 a month, tracks five named AI surfaces, and includes white-label delivery without a sales call, worth a look if AI visibility is the actual gap rather than a bundled extra.
Read the AI Peekaboo review →Which should you choose?
LumarScrepyScrepyLumarScrepyLumarLumarThese two rarely compete for the same buyer, but the comparison is still useful because both are pitched as consolidation plays. Lumar consolidates for a large organization: crawling, AI visibility, accessibility, and speed under one enterprise contract with the sales process to match. Screpy consolidates for a small one: audits, rank tracking, uptime, and speed under one $10-to-$59 monthly plan, with real depth traded away to hit that price. If your site has millions of URLs and legal accessibility requirements, Screpy will not stretch that far. If you are a solo consultant managing a handful of client sites, Lumar's enterprise sales process is solving a problem you do not have.
Bottom line
Book the Lumar demo only once your organization genuinely needs AI visibility tracking and WCAG 2.2 accessibility testing reported alongside crawl data, and has the budget for an enterprise vendor relationship. Start with Screpy's $10 Lite plan if you are a freelancer or small business that wants auditing, rank tracking, and uptime monitoring in one place without four separate subscriptions, and can live without an API. If Screpy's crawl depth or the platform rebuild becomes a limiting factor, pair it with a dedicated crawler like Screaming Frog rather than jumping straight to Lumar's enterprise pricing.
Frequently asked questions
Is Screpy a realistic alternative to Lumar for a small business?
For a small business or freelancer, yes: Screpy covers site auditing, rank tracking, uptime, and Core Web Vitals for $10 to $59 a month, which is a fraction of what an enterprise Lumar contract would cost and more coverage than most small sites need in a single tool. What it will not replace is Lumar's AI brand visibility tracking or WCAG 2.2 accessibility testing, which Screpy does not offer at any tier.
Does Screpy track AI search visibility the way Lumar does?
No, Screpy does not track brand visibility in ChatGPT, Gemini, or any other AI answer engine. Its AI functionality is limited to interpreting its own audit results and turning them into prioritized, plain-language recommendations, which is a different capability from Lumar's GEO and AEO monitoring module.
Why does Screpy have no API on any plan?
Screpy has not built API access into its current platform on any tier, including the top Advanced plan. Teams that need to pipe SEO data into a custom dashboard or BI tool will need to export manually from Screpy or look at a different platform, including Lumar, which offers API access for data export as part of its enterprise contract.
What does Screpy's ongoing rebuild mean for current subscribers?
Screpy has publicly signaled that a significant platform update is in development. Existing users keep access to the current version while the rebuild continues, but some features may shift as the new version rolls out, which is worth factoring in if platform stability matters more to you than price.
Can Screpy handle white-label client reporting like an agency tool?
Yes, from the $30-a-month Pro tier up, Screpy lets agencies apply their own logo and branding to client-facing reports, which is unusual to find at that price point. Lumar does not publish whether white-label reporting is included in its enterprise tier, so confirm that directly during the demo if it matters to your agency.
Is Screpy deep enough to replace a dedicated crawler for a large site?
No, Screpy's audit checks and crawl limits are noticeably lighter than a dedicated crawler like Screaming Frog or Sitebulb, and it is better understood as a monitoring dashboard with audit functionality bolted on rather than a primary crawling tool. Large sites with complex technical issues are better served by a dedicated crawler, or by Lumar's enterprise crawl engine if AI visibility and accessibility reporting are also required.