Comparison

Sitechecker vs Treo in 2026: Agency crawl-and-rank dashboard vs free Core Web Vitals monitoring

Sitechecker bundles crawling, rank tracking, and an AI Visibility Tracker starting at $89 a month. Treo skips all of that and monitors Core Web Vitals through real Chrome UX Report data, with a genuine free tier.

Updated July 3, 2026
Sitechecker
Treo
Key takeaways
  • Treo has a genuine free tier for one site; Sitechecker has no free tier at all, with its entry Basic plan starting at $89/month.
  • Sitechecker includes an AI Visibility Tracker monitoring ChatGPT and Perplexity mentions from its $219/month Standard tier; Treo has no AI search tracking feature of any kind.
  • Treo monitors Core Web Vitals using real Chrome UX Report field data plus on-demand Lighthouse scores; Sitechecker's own feature list has no page speed or Core Web Vitals testing capability.
  • Treo provides API access from its $75/month Vital plan; Sitechecker restricts API access to its Enterprise tier only.
  • Sitechecker bundles a site crawler and keyword rank tracker with white-label reporting; Treo does none of these, its scope is Core Web Vitals monitoring only.
  • Both support competitive benchmarking, but on different axes: Treo compares Core Web Vitals scores against competitor domains, Sitechecker compares keyword rankings against competitors.

Sitechecker and Treo sit in the same technical SEO category and cover almost none of the same ground. Sitechecker is an agency dashboard combining a site crawler, keyword rank tracker, white-label reporting, and an AI Visibility Tracker that monitors ChatGPT and Perplexity mentions, all starting at $89 a month with no free tier. Treo has no crawler, no rank tracker, and no AI search reporting at all; it exists to monitor Core Web Vitals using real Chrome UX Report field data alongside on-demand Lighthouse scores, with a free tier for one site and paid plans from $75 a month. Sitechecker's own feature list has no page speed testing capability, and Treo makes no SEO or AI visibility claim of any kind. The comparison is worth having because both get filed under the same category label, and it helps to be clear about which actual problem each one solves.

The tools at a glance

ToolStarting priceBest for
Sitechecker$89/monthSmall-to-mid agencies and in-house SEO teams that want crawling, rank tracking, alerts, and a first pass at AI search visibility reporting in one dashboard, without needing API access on a starter budget.
Treo$0/monthPerformance-focused agencies and in-house teams on large sites that need real Chrome UX Report data, automated URL discovery, and multi-site Core Web Vitals monitoring without building their own CrUX integration.

Sitechecker

SEO command center for agencies managing multiple client sites, with crawling, rank tracking, technical issue detection, and AI visibility tracking from a unified dashboard.

Full review →
Sitechecker screenshot

Sitechecker combines a website crawler, keyword rank tracker, Google Search Console dashboard, and SEO alerts into a single subscription starting at $89 a month, with white-label reporting unlocking at the $219 Standard tier. For an agency delivering one branded report instead of assembling exports from several tools, that packaging carries real weight.

The AI Visibility Tracker is what genuinely differentiates Sitechecker among tools at this price: it monitors how a website is referenced in ChatGPT and Perplexity responses, giving agencies a first pass at AI search reporting without buying a separate product for it.

There is no free tier to test the platform before committing, and API access is reserved for Enterprise customers, so a Basic or Standard subscriber cannot pull crawl, rank, or AI visibility data into their own systems. Page speed and Core Web Vitals are entirely outside its scope.

Pricing
Feature
Basic
$89/month
Standard
$219/month
Premium
$379/month
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Website CrawlerYesYesYesYes
Rank TrackerYesYesYesYes
AI Visibility TrackerNoYesYesYes
White Label ReportsNoYesYesYes
API accessNoNoNoYes
Best for: Small-to-mid agencies and in-house SEO teams that want crawling, rank tracking, alerts, and a first pass at AI search visibility reporting in one dashboard, without needing API access on a starter budget.

Treo

Core Web Vitals monitoring using real-world Chrome UX Report data.

Full review →
Treo screenshot

Treo is built around a single distinction: a synthetic Lighthouse score can look healthy while real Chrome users are still experiencing slow LCP or layout shift. It solves that by pulling field data straight from the Chrome UX Report and pairing it with on-demand Lighthouse audits, so the lab score and the real-world score sit side by side instead of living in two separate tools.

URL discovery runs off the sitemap automatically, no tagging script or manual list required, and paid plans add competitive benchmarking on Core Web Vitals against named domains, a multi-site dashboard for agency portfolios, and an API for pulling data into Looker Studio or a custom pipeline.

The free tier covers one site, useful for sampling data quality but not for running a client workload. Competitive benchmarking and API access unlock at the $75/month Vital plan, capped at five sites, with Pro and Scale needed for larger portfolios. Treo has no crawler, no rank tracker, and no AI visibility feature; performance monitoring is the entire product.

Pricing
Feature
Free
$0/month
Vital
$75/month
Pro
$185/month
Scale
$375/month
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Sites monitored1Up to 5Up to 15Up to 50Custom
CrUX field dataYesYesYesYesYes
Competitive benchmarkingNoYesYesYesYes
API accessNoYesYesYesYes
Best for: Performance-focused agencies and in-house teams on large sites that need real Chrome UX Report data, automated URL discovery, and multi-site Core Web Vitals monitoring without building their own CrUX integration.

Head-to-head feature comparison

Feature
Sitechecker
Treo
Core functionSEO command center: crawling, rank tracking, and AI visibility monitoring in one dashboardCore Web Vitals monitoring using real Chrome UX Report field data
Site crawler / technical auditYesNo
Keyword rank trackingYesNo
AI Visibility Tracker (ChatGPT / Perplexity mentions)Yes, from the $219/month Standard tierNo, not built for AI search visibility
Core Web Vitals / CrUX field data monitoringNo, not part of the feature setYes, CrUX field data plus on-demand Lighthouse
Automated URL / sitemap discoveryNo, crawls based on configured site scope rather than sitemap scanningYes, via automated sitemap scanning
Competitive benchmarkingYes, keyword rank comparison against competitorsYes, performance comparison against competitor domains, paid plans
White-label reportingYes, Standard tier and aboveNo, not documented
API accessEnterprise onlyYes, Vital plan and above
Free tierNoYes, 1 site
Starting price$89/month$0/month
Multi-site / multi-client managementYes, built for agencies managing multiple client sitesYes, multi-site dashboard for agencies

Need AI visibility tracking that neither of these tools fully covers?

AI Peekaboo dashboard

Sitechecker's AI Visibility Tracker only appears from the $219/month Standard tier, and API access to that data is Enterprise-only, so teams on lower tiers cannot pull the numbers into their own reporting. Treo makes no AI search claim at all; it exists purely to monitor Core Web Vitals from real Chrome user data. AI Peekaboo tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode, with a read and write API included on every plan from $50 a month and white-label delivery built in. For agencies that want dedicated AI search reporting with API access from day one instead of gated behind a $219 tier, it is the more direct fit alongside either of these tools.

Read the AI Peekaboo review →

Which should you choose?

Agencies that need crawling, rank tracking, and a first pass at AI visibility in one subscriptionSitechecker
Teams that specifically need Core Web Vitals field data from real Chrome usersTreo
Solo operators who want to try a tool for free before paying anythingTreo
Small agencies delivering white-label client reportsSitechecker
Developers who want API access without an enterprise contractTreo
Agencies introducing AI search visibility reporting to existing clientsSitechecker

These two products barely overlap despite sharing a category page. Sitechecker's job is running an ongoing agency SEO program, crawl, rank, alert, and now a first pass at AI search visibility, in one subscription. Treo's job is proving how fast a site actually is for the people using it, sourced from real Chrome data rather than synthetic-only scores. A site with both an unmanaged SEO program and no performance visibility has two separate problems, and only one of these tools addresses each.

Bottom line

Choose Sitechecker if the priority is running an agency SEO program with crawling, rank tracking, and a first pass at AI search visibility, and $89 a month with an Enterprise-only API is acceptable. Choose Treo's free tier first if the priority is Core Web Vitals visibility, and move to the $75/month Vital plan once competitive benchmarking or API access is needed. Sitechecker will not tell you how fast your pages load for real users, and Treo will not crawl your site, track rankings, or report on AI search mentions.

Frequently asked questions

Does Treo track AI search visibility the way Sitechecker does?

No, Treo has no AI search visibility tracking of any kind, its entire scope is Core Web Vitals monitoring using Chrome UX Report field data. Sitechecker's AI Visibility Tracker, available from its $219/month Standard tier, monitors how a site is referenced in ChatGPT and Perplexity responses, a category Treo does not touch.

Is Treo cheaper than Sitechecker?

Yes, significantly. Treo has a genuine free tier for one site and paid plans starting at $75/month, while Sitechecker has no free tier at all, with its entry Basic plan starting at $89/month.

Can Sitechecker monitor Core Web Vitals like Treo?

No, Sitechecker's feature list has no page speed or Core Web Vitals testing capability. Its scope is crawling, rank tracking, alerts, and AI visibility monitoring; a dedicated tool like Treo is needed for real-user performance data.

Which tool has a free tier, Sitechecker or Treo?

Treo has a free tier covering one site with Chrome UX Report field data and automated sitemap discovery, no credit card required. Sitechecker has no free plan at all; evaluating it requires committing to at least the $89/month Basic tier.

Can I get API access to Sitechecker without an enterprise contract?

No, Sitechecker reserves API access for Enterprise customers only. Treo provides API access starting from its $75/month Vital plan, well below an enterprise-level commitment.

Which tool should an agency pick if it wants both AI visibility reporting and Core Web Vitals monitoring?

Neither tool covers both, so an agency needing both would run Sitechecker for crawling, rank tracking, and AI visibility reporting alongside Treo for Core Web Vitals data. Sitechecker has no performance monitoring, and Treo has no rank tracking, crawling, or AI visibility feature.

Found this useful? Share it: